Funding for this research was provided by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory; the Victorian Department of Human Services, Melbourne, Victoria; the South Australian Department of Health, Adelaide, South Australia; and support from the Victorian Government's Operational Infrastructure Support Program, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Women's Experience of Discrimination in Australian Perinatal Care: The Double Disadvantage of Social Adversity and Unequal Care
Article first published online: 27 JUN 2012
© 2012, Copyright the Authors, Journal compilation © 2012, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Volume 39, Issue 3, pages 211–220, September 2012
How to Cite
Yelland, J. S., Sutherland, G. A. and Brown, S. J. (2012), Women's Experience of Discrimination in Australian Perinatal Care: The Double Disadvantage of Social Adversity and Unequal Care. Birth, 39: 211–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00550.x
- Issue published online: 29 AUG 2012
- Article first published online: 27 JUN 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 23 JAN 2012
- Australian National Health and Medical Research Council
- Victorian Department of Human Services
- South Australian Department of Health
- Victorian Government
- perinatal care;
- social health
Discrimination in women's health care, particularly perinatal care, has received minimal attention. The aim of this study is to describe women's experience of discrimination in different models of maternity care and to examine the relationship between maternal social characteristics and perceived discrimination in perinatal care.
A population-based postal survey was mailed 6 months postpartum to all women who gave birth in two Australian states in September and October 2007. Perceived discrimination was assessed using a five-item measure designed to elicit information about experiences of unequal treatment by health professionals.
A total of 4,366 eligible women completed the survey. Women attending public models of maternity care were significantly more likely to report perceived discrimination compared with women attending a private obstetrician (30.7% vs 19.7%, OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.5–2.1). Compared with women reporting no stressful life events or social health issues in pregnancy, those reporting three or more stressful life events or social health issues had a twofold increase in adjusted odds of perceived discrimination (41.1% vs 20.4%, adj OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.8–2.8). Young women (< 25 yr) and women who were smoking in pregnancy were also at increased risk of experiencing perceived discrimination.
Discrimination is an unexplored factor in how women experience perinatal care. Developing approaches to perinatal care that incorporate the capacity to respond to the needs of vulnerable women and families requires far-reaching changes to the organization and provision of care. (BIRTH 39:3 September 2012)