SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Parasuraman B. Electronic versus paper questionnaires: a further comparison in persons with asthma. J Asthma 2003;40: 75162.
  • 2
    Drummond HE, Ghosh S, Ferguson A, Brackenridge D, Tiplady B. Electronic quality of life questionnaires. a comparison of pen-based electronic questionnaires with conventional paper in a gastrointestinal study. Qual Life Res 1995;4: 216.
  • 3
    Pouwer F, Snoek FJ, Van Der Ploeg HM, et al. A comparison of the standard and the computerized versions of the Well-Being Questionnaire (WBQ) and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Qual Life Res 1998;7: 338.
  • 4
    Kleinman L, Leidy NK, Crawley J, et al. A comparative trial of paper-and-pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire. Med Care 2001;39: 1819.
  • 5
    Bliven BD, Kaufman SE, Spertus JA. Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: validity, time benefits, and patient preference. Qual Life Res 2001;10: 1522.
  • 6
    Caro JJ Sr, Caro I, Caro J, et al. Does electronic implementation of questionnaires used in asthma alter responses compared to paper implementation? Qual Life Res 2001;10: 68391.
  • 7
    Patrick DL, Drossman DA, Frederick IO, et al. Quality of life in persons with irritable bowel syndrome: development and validation of a new measure. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43: 40011.
  • 8
    Drossman DA, Patrick DL, Whitehead WE, et al. Further validation of the IBS-QOL: a disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95: 9991007.
    Direct Link:
  • 9
    Reilly MC, Bracco A, Ricci J-F, et al. The validity and accuracy of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire—Irritable Bowel Syndrome version (WPAI:IBS). Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20: 19.
  • 10
    Reilly MC, Tanner A, Meltzer EO. Work, classroom and activity impairment instruments: validation studies in allergic rhinitis. Clin Drug Invest 1996;11: 27888.
  • 11
    Wahlqvist P, Carlsson J, Stalhammar NO, Wiklund I. Validity of a work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire for patients with symptoms of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (WPAI-GERD)—results from a cross-sectional study. Value Health 2002;5: 10613.
  • 12
    Reilly MC, Lavin PT, Kahler KH, Pariser DM. Validation of the dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and the work productivity and activity impairment: chronic hand dermatitis questionnaire (WPAI-ChHD) in chronic hand dermatitis (ChHD). J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48: 12830.
  • 13
    Kind P. The EuroQol instrument. an index of health-related quality of life. In: SpilkerB, ed., Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996.
  • 14
    Konig HH, Ulshofer A, Gregor M, et al. Validation of the EuroQol questionnaire in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;14: 120515.
  • 15
    Hurst NP, Kind P, Ruta D, et al. Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D). Br J Rheumatol 1997;36: 5519.
  • 16
    Wu AW, Jacobson KL, Frick KD, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the EuroQol as a measure of health-related quality of life in people enrolled in an AIDS clinical trial. Qual Life Res 2002;11: 27382.
  • 17
    Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Ricci JF, Bracco A. Performance of the EQ-5D in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Value Health 2006;9.
  • 18
    Drossman DA, Corazziari E, Talley NJ et al., eds. Rome II: The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (2nd ed.). McLean, VA: Degnon Associates, Inc, 2000.
  • 19
    Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.
  • 20
    Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Controlled Clin Trials 1991;12(Suppl.):S14258.
  • 21
    Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002;11: 193205.
  • 22
    Cronbach LF. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16: 297334.
  • 23
    SPSS, Inc. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences® Base 10.0 for Windows User's Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc., 1999.
  • 24
    Johannes C, Woods J, Crawford S, et al. Electronic versus paper instruments for daily data collection. Ann Epidemiol 2000;10: 457.
  • 25
    Ryan JM, Corry JR, Attewell R, Smithson MJ. A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 general health questionnaire to the standard paper version. Qual Life Res 2002;11: 1926.
  • 26
    Palermo TM, Valenzuela D, Stork PP. A randomized trial of electronic versus paper pain diaries in children. impact on compliance, accuracy, and acceptability. Pain 2004;107: 21319.