SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1999;8:20924.
  • 2
    EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199208.
  • 3
    Boyle MH, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. Reliability of the Health Utilities Index—Mark III used in the 1991 cycle 6 Canadian General Social Survey Health Questionnaire. Qual Life Res 1995;4:24957.
  • 4
    Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW. Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics 1995;7:490502.
  • 5
    Sintonen H, Pekurinen M. A generic 15 dimensional measure of health-related quality of life (15D). J Soc Med 1989;26:8596.
  • 6
    Rosser R, Kind P. A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus. Int J Epidemiol 1978;7:34758.
  • 7
    Kaplan R, Bush J. Health-related quality of life measurement for evaluation research and policy analysis. Health Psychol 1982;1:6180.
  • 8
    Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002;21:27192.
  • 9
    Mill J. A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive (People's ed.). London: Longmans Green, 1898.
  • 10
    Hawthorne G. Measuring the value of health-related quality of life. In: RitsnerM, AwadG, eds. Quality of Life Impairment in Schizophrenia, Mood and Anxiety Disorders: New Perspectives on Research and Treatment. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007.
  • 11
    Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Day NA. A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Ann Med 2001;33:35870.
  • 12
    Hawthorne G, Richardson J. Measuring the value of program outcomes: a review of utility measures. Exp Rev Pharmacoeconom Res 2001;1:21528.
  • 13
    Kopec JA, Willison KD. A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:31725.
  • 14
    Langfitt JT, Vickrey BG, McDermott MP, et al. Validity and responsiveness of generic preference-based HRQOL instruments in chronic epilepsy. Qual Life Res 2006;15:899914.
  • 15
    Luo N, Johnson JA, Shaw JW, et al. Self-reported health status of the general adult U.S. population as assessed by the EQ-5D and Health Utilities Index. Med Care 2005;43:107886.
  • 16
    Macran S, Weatherly H, Kind P. Measuring population health: a comparison of three generic health status measures. Med Care 2003;41:21831.
  • 17
    Marra CA, Woolcott JC, Kopec JA, et al. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med 2005;60:157182.
  • 18
    McDonough CM, Grove MR, Tosteson TD, et al. Comparison of EQ-5D, HUI, and SF-36-derived societal health state values among spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT) participants. Qual Life Res 2005;14:132132.
  • 19
    Dillman D. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley, 1978.
  • 20
    Dillman DA, Sangster RL, Tarnai J, Rockwood TH. Understanding differences in people's answers to telephone and mail surveys. New Dir Eval 1996;70:4561.
  • 21
    Day NA, Dunt DR, Day S. Maximizing response to surveys in health program evaluation at minimum cost using multiple methods: mail, telephone and visit. Eval Rev 1995;19:43650.
  • 22
    Pedhazur E, Schmelkin L. Measurement, Design and Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1991.
  • 23
    WHOQoL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychol Med 1998;28:5518.
  • 24
    Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:22033.
  • 25
    Berwick D, Murphy J, Goldman P, et al. Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Med Care 1991;29:16976.
  • 26
    Yammarino F, Skinner S, Childers T. Understanding mail survey response behavior: a meta-analysis. Public Opin Q 1991;55:61339.
  • 27
    Dorman PJ, Slattery J, Farrell B, et al. A randomised comparison of the EuroQol and Short Form-36 after stroke. United Kingdom collaborators in the International Stroke Trial. BMJ 1997;315:461.
  • 28
    Holland R, Smith R, Harvey I, et al. Assessing quality of life in the elderly: a direct comparison of the EQ-5D and AQoL. Health Econ 2004;13:793805.
  • 29
    Anastasi A. Psychological Testing (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing, 1976.
  • 30
    Streiner D, Norman G. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications, 1995.
  • 31
    Brazier J, Roberts J, Tsuchiya A, Busschbach J. A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Econ 2004;13:87384.
  • 32
    Johnson JA, Pickard AS. Comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-12 health surveys in a general population survey in Alberta, Canada. Med Care 2000;38:11521.
  • 33
    Wilson D, Wakefield M, Taylor A. The South Australian Health Omnibus Survey. Health Promot J Austr 1992;2:479.
  • 34
    Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance G. Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3 (HUI2/3) 15-item Questionnaire for Self-administered, Self-assessed Usual Health Status. Hamilton: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, 1996.
  • 35
    Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Day N. A comparison of five multi-attribute utility instruments. Aust Stud Health Serv Adm 2001;89:15179.
  • 36
    Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Day N. A Comparison of Five Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments. Working Paper 140. Melbourne: Centre for Health Program Evaluation, 2003.
  • 37
    Feeny D, Torrance G, Furlong W. Health utilities index. In: SpilkerB, ed., Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials (2nd ed.). Philadelpha: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1996.
  • 38
    Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G, et al. Multiplicative Multi-attribute Utility Function for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) System: A Technical Report. Working Paper. Hamilton: McMaster University, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, 1998. Report No.: 98-11.
  • 39
    Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, Boyle M. Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics 1995;7:50320.
  • 40
    Rabin R, De Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001;33:33743.
  • 41
    MVHGroup. The Measurement and Valuation of Health: Final Modelling of Valuation Tariffs. York: Centre for Health Economics, 1995.
  • 42
    Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997;35:1095108.
  • 43
    Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. Valuing health states: a comparison of methods. J Health Econ 1996;15:20931.
  • 44
    Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1998.
  • 45
    Hawthorne G, Elliott P. Imputing cross-sectional missing data: a comparison of common techniques. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005;39:58390.
  • 46
    Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Day N, McNeil H. Using the “Assessment of Quality of Life” (AQoL) Instrument. Technical Report. Melbourne: CHPE, 2000. Report No.: 12.
  • 47
    Molenaar IW, Sijtsma K, Boer P. User's Manual MSP5 for Windows: A Program for Mokken Scale Analysis for Polytomous Items. Groningen: ProGAMMA, 2000.
  • 48
    Van Schuur WH. Mokken scale analysis: between the Guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Pol Anal 2003;11:13963.
  • 49
    Loevinger J. The technic of homogenous tests compared with some aspects of scale analysis and factor analysis. Psychol Bull 1948;45:50729.
  • 50
    Mokken RJ. A non-parametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses. Appl Psychol Meas 1982;6:41730.
  • 51
    Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 1982;47:14974.
  • 52
    Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut, 1960.
  • 53
    SPSS. SPSS 16.0 for Windows. Chicago: SPSS Inc., 2008.
  • 54
    Molenaar IW, Van Schuur WH, Sijtsma K, et al. MSPWIN 5.0: A Program for Mokken Scale Analysis for Polytomous Items. Groningen: Science Plus Group bv., 2004.
  • 55
    Andrich D, Sheridan B, Luo G. RUMM2020 (4.0 ed.). Perth: RUMM Laboraty Pty Ltd, 2005.
  • 56
    Bland J, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;30710.
  • 57
    Kim J, Mueller CW. Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1978.
  • 58
    Hawthorne G, Osborne R. Population norms and meaningful differences for the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) measure. Aust N Z J Public Health 2005;29:13642.
  • 59
    Taylor HR, Keeffe JE, Vu HT, et al. Vision loss in Australia. Med J Aust 2005;182:5658.
  • 60
    Wilson DH, Walsh PG, Sanchez L, et al. The epidemiology of hearing impairment in an Australian adult population. Int J Epidemiol 1999;28:24752.
  • 61
    McHorney C, Tarlov A. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995;4:293307.