SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Wen SW, Smith G, Yang Q, Walker M. Epidemiology of preterm birth and neonatal outcome. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;9:42935.
  • 2
    Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Critical Care Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2006.
  • 3
    Tucker J, McGuire W. Epidemiology of preterm birth. BMJ 2004;329:6758.
  • 4
    Institute of Medicine. Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences and Prevention. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.
  • 5
    Slattery MM, Morrison JJ. Preterm delivery. Lancet 2002;360:148997.
  • 6
    Lefebvre F, Glorieux J, St. Laurent-Gagnon T. Neonatal survival and disability rate at age 18 months for infants born between 23 and 28 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:8338.
  • 7
    O'Shea TM, Klinepeter KL, Goldstein DJ, et al. Survival and developmental disability in infants with birth weights of 501 to 800 g, born between 1979 and 1994. Pediatrics 1997;100:9826.
  • 8
    Allen MC, Donohue PK, Dusman AE. The limit of viability—neonatal outcome of infants born at 22 to 25 weeks' gestation. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1597601.
  • 9
    Kilpatrick SJ, Schleuter MA, Piecuch RE, et al. Outcome of infants born at 24–26 weeks gestation: I Survival and cost. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:8038.
  • 10
    Hack M, Friedman H, Fanaroff AA. Outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1996;98:9317.
  • 11
    Hack M, Fanaroff A. Outcome of extremely low birthweight and gestational age in the 1990s. Early Hum Dev 1999;53:193218.
  • 12
    Bracewell M, Marlow N. Patterns of motor disability in very preterm children. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2002;8:2418.
  • 13
    Saigal S, Den Ouden L, Wolke D, et al. School-age outcomes in children who were extremely low birth weight from four international population-based cohorts. Pediatrics 2003;112:94350.
  • 14
    Wolke D, Meyer R. Cognitive status, language attainment and pre-reading skills of 6 year-old very preterm children and their peers: the Bavarian Longitudinal Study. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999;41:94109.
  • 15
    Botting N, Powls A, Cooke RWI, Marlow N. Cognitive and educational outcome of very low birthweight children in early adolescence. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998;40:65260.
  • 16
    Hall A, McLeod A, Counsell C, et al. School attainment, cognitive ability and motor function in a total Scottish very low birthweight population at 8 years—a controlled study. Dev Med Child Neurol 1995;37:103750.
  • 17
    Horwood LJ, Mogridge N, Darlow B. Cognitive, educational and behavioural outcomes at 7–8 years in a national very low birthweight cohort. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998;79:F1220.
  • 18
    Hille ETM, Den Ouden AL, Saigal S, et al. Consistency in the types of behaviour problems reported in children who had weighed 1000 grams or less at birth in four countries. Lancet 2001;357:16413.
  • 19
    Botting N, Powls A, Cooke RWI, Marlow N. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity disorders and other psychiatric outcomes in very low birthweight children at age 12 years. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1997;38:93141.
  • 20
    Wolke D. The psychological development of prematurely born children. Arch Dis Child 1998;78:56770.
  • 21
    Pharoah POD, Stevenson CJ, Cooke RW, Stevenson RC. Prevalence of behaviour disorders in low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child 1994;70:2714.
  • 22
    Petrou S, Sach T, Davidson LL. The long-term costs of preterm birth and low birth weight: results of a systematic review. Child Care Health Dev 2001;27:97115.
  • 23
    Zupancic JAF. A systematic review of the costs associated with preterm birth. In: Institute of Medicine, ed., Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences and Prevention. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.
  • 24
    Saigal S, Feeny D, Furlong W, et al. Comparison of the health-related quality of life of extremely low birth weight children and a reference group of children at age eight years. J Pediatr 1994;125:41825.
  • 25
    Saigal S, Rosenbaum P, Stoskopf B, et al. Comprehensive assessment of the health status of extremely low birth weight children at eight years of age: comparison with a reference group. Pediatrics 1994;125:41117.
  • 26
    Saigal S, Feeny D, Rosenbaum P, et al. Self-perceived health status and health-related quality of life of extremely low-birth-weight infants at adolescence. JAMA 1996;276:4539.
  • 27
    Zwicker JG, Harris SR. Quality of life of formerly preterm and very low birthweight infants from preschool age to adulthood: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2008;121:e36676.
  • 28
    Verrips E, Vogels T, Saigal S, et al. Health-related quality of life for extremely low birth weight adolescents in Canada, Germany, and the Netherlands. Pediatrics 2008;122:55661.
  • 29
    Gray R, Petrou S, Hockley C, Gardner F. Self-reported health status and health–related quality of life of teenagers who were born before 29 weeks gestational age. Pediatrics 2007;120:e8693.
  • 30
    Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, et al. for the EPICure Study Group. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2000;343:37884.
  • 31
    Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M for the EPICure Study Group. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2005;352:919.
  • 32
    Johnson S, Fawke J, Hennessy E, et al. Patterns of neurologic and developmental disability through 11 years in children born before 26 weeks of gestation: The Epicure Study. Pediatrics in press.
  • 33
    Allen C, Beecham J. Costing services: ideals and reality. In: NettenA, BeechamJ, eds. Costing Community Care: Theory and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 1993.
  • 34
    Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, et al. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • 35
    National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: NICE, 2004.
  • 36
    Department of Health, England. NHS Reference Costs 2006–07. Department of Health. London: The Information Centre, 2007.
  • 37
    Curtis L. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care. Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU). Canterbury: University of Kent, 2007.
  • 38
    British National Formulary (BNF). BNF for Children. London: BNF, 2007.
  • 39
    Petrou S, McCann D, Law CM, et al. Health status and health-related quality of life of children aged 7–9 years with permanent childhood hearing impairment. Pediatrics 2007;120:104452.
  • 40
    Sung L, Petrou S, Ungar W. Measuring health utilities in children and their parents. In: UngarW, ed. Economic Evaluation in Child Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009:7790.
  • 41
    Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, Boyle M. Multi-attribute preference functions: Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoecon 1995;7:50320.
  • 42
    Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Barr RD. The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann Med 2001;33:37584.
  • 43
    Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, et al. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Med Care 2002;40:11328.
  • 44
    Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW, et al. Multiplicative Multi-attribute Utility Function for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) System: A Technical Report. Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University, Canada. Working Paper 98-11, December 1998.
  • 45
    Barber JA, Thompson SG. Analysis of cost data in randomized trials: an application of the non-parametric bootstrap. Stat Med 2000;19:21936.
  • 46
    Briggs A, Claxton K, Sculpher M. Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  • 47
    Greene WH. Econometric Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.
  • 48
    Wolke D, Ratschinski G, Ohrt B, Riegel K. The cognitive outcome of very preterm infants may be poorer than often reported: an empirical investigation of how methodological issues make a big difference. Eur J Pediatr 1994;153:90615.
  • 49
    Ungar W. Economic Evaluation in Child Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • 50
    Drummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med 2001;33:3449.
  • 51
    Marra CA, Woolcott JC, Kopec JA, et al. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med 2005;60:157182.
  • 52
    Department for Children, Schools and Families. Schools and Pupils in England. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families, 2007.
  • 53
    Wechsler D. Wechsler Individual Achievement Test (2nd ed.). London: Harcourt Assessment Inc, 2004.
  • 54
    Petrou S, Murray L, Cooper P, Davidson LL. The accuracy of self-reported health care resource utilization in health economic studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002;18:70510.
  • 55
    Petrou S. Methodological issues raised by preference-based approaches to measuring the health status of children. Health Econ 2003;12:697702.
  • 56
    Verrips GHW, Stuifbergen MC, Den Ouden LA, et al. Measuring health status using the Health Utility Index: agreement between raters and between modalities of administration. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:47581.
  • 57
    Eiser C, Morse R. Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technol Assess 2001;5:1156.
  • 58
    Feeny D, Furlong W, Saigal S, Sun J. Comparing directly measured standard gamble scores to HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores: group- and individual-level comparisons. Soc Sci Med 2004;58:799809.
  • 59
    National Institute for Health and Clinical. Excellence (NICE). Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. London: NICE, 2007.