High-Resolution Modeling Assisted Design of Customized and Individualized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Protocols

Authors


  • For more information on author guidelines, an explanation of our peer review process, and conflict of interest informed consent policies, please go to http://www.wiley.com/bw/submit.asp?ref=1094-7159&site=1

  • Conflict of Interest and Sources of Funding Statement: Dr. Datta is cofounder of Soterix Medical. The City University of New York has patent applications in Dr. Datta's name on brain stimulation. Dr. Bikson is funded by the National Institutes of Health (nos. S06 GM008168 NS054783, CRCNS 41771), the Andy Grove Foundation, and the Wallace H Coulter Foundation. The City University of New York has patent applications in Dr. Bikson's name on brain stimulation. Dr. Bikson is cofounder of Soterix Medical.

Marom Bikson, PhD, 160 Convent Ave., Steinman Hall, Rm. #403B, New York, NY 10031, USA. Email: bikson@ccny.cuny.edu

Abstract

Objectives:  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory technique that delivers low-intensity currents facilitating or inhibiting spontaneous neuronal activity. tDCS is attractive since dose is readily adjustable by simply changing electrode number, position, size, shape, and current. In the recent past, computational models have been developed with increased precision with the goal to help customize tDCS dose. The aim of this review is to discuss the incorporation of high-resolution patient-specific computer modeling to guide and optimize tDCS.

Methods:  In this review, we discuss the following topics: 1) The clinical motivation and rationale for models of transcranial stimulation is considered pivotal in order to leverage the flexibility of neuromodulation; 2) the protocols and the workflow for developing high-resolution models; 3) the technical challenges and limitations of interpreting modeling predictions; and 4) real cases merging modeling and clinical data illustrating the impact of computational models on the rational design of rehabilitative electrotherapy.

Conclusions:  Though modeling for noninvasive brain stimulation is still in its development phase, it is predicted that with increased validation, dissemination, simplification, and democratization of modeling tools, computational forward models of neuromodulation will become useful tools to guide the optimization of clinical electrotherapy.

Ancillary