Received from the RTI International-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center (DAD, NDB, SS, KNL, MPP), Research Triangle Park, NC; Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program (DAD, MPP); Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research (MPP), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; and Divisions of General Internal Medicine (DAD, SS, MPP) and Community Pediatrics (DAD), University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
Literacy and Health Outcomes
A Systematic Review of the Literature
Article first published online: 6 DEC 2004
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 19, Issue 12, pages 1228–1239, December 2004
How to Cite
DeWalt, D. A., Berkman, N. D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K. N. and Pignone, M. P. (2004), Literacy and Health Outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19: 1228–1239. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40153.x
- Issue published online: 6 DEC 2004
- Article first published online: 6 DEC 2004
- health literacy;
- health outcomes;
- systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To review the relationship between literacy and health outcomes.
DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), Public Affairs Information Service (PAIS), Industrial and Labor Relations Review (ILLR), PsychInfo, and Ageline from 1980 to 2003.
STUDY SELECTION: We included observational studies that reported original data, measured literacy with any valid instrument, and measured one or more health outcomes. Two abstractors reviewed each study for inclusion and resolved disagreements by discussion.
DATA EXTRACTION: One reviewer abstracted data from each article into an evidence table; the second reviewer checked each entry. The whole study team reconciled disagreements about information in evidence tables. Both data extractors independently completed an 11-item quality scale for each article; scores were averaged to give a final measure of article quality.
DATA SYNTHESIS: We reviewed 3,015 titles and abstracts and pulled 684 articles for full review; 73 articles met inclusion criteria and, of those, 44 addressed the questions of this report. Patients with low literacy had poorer health outcomes, including knowledge, intermediate disease markers, measures of morbidity, general health status, and use of health resources. Patients with low literacy were generally 1.5 to 3 times more likely to experience a given poor outcome. The average quality of the articles was fair to good. Most studies were cross-sectional in design; many failed to address adequately confounding and the use of multiple comparisons.
CONCLUSIONS: Low literacy is associated with several adverse health outcomes. Future research, using more rigorous methods, will better define these relationships and guide developers of new interventions.