SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century Health Care Services. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
  • 2
    Braunwald E. Shattuck lecture—cardiovascular medicine at the turn of the millennium: triumphs, concerns, and opportunities. N Engl J Med. 1997;337: 13609.
  • 3
    McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348: 263545.
  • 4
    Grant RW, Cagliero E, Murphy-Sheehy P, Singer DE, Nathan DM, Meigs JB. Comparison of hyperglycemia, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia management in patients with type 2 diabetes. Am J Med. 2002;112: 6039.
  • 5
    Grant RW, Cagliero E, Dubey A, et al. Clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes metabolic risk factors. Diabetic Med. 2004; 21: 1505.
  • 6
    Kottke TE, Brekke ML, Solberg LI. Making time for preventative services. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993;68: 78591.
  • 7
    Hibble A, Kanka D, Pencheon D, Pooles E. Guidelines in general practice: the new tower of Babel? BMJ. 1998;317: 8623.
  • 8
    Pearson TA, McBride PE, Miller NH, Smith SC Jr. 27th Bethesda conference: matching the intensity of risk factor management with the hazard for coronary disease events. Task Force 8. Organization of preventive cardiology service. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27: 103947.
  • 9
    Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes B, Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120: 13542.
  • 10
    Classen D. Clinical decision support systems to improve clinical practice and quality of care. JAMA. 1998;280: 13601.
  • 11
    Smith S, Murphy M, Huschka T, et al. Impact of a diabetes electronic management system on the care of patients seen in a subspecialty diabetes clinic. Diabetes Care. 1998;21: 9726.
  • 12
    McDonald C. Use of a computer to detect and respond to clinical events: its effect on clinician behavior. Ann Int Med. 1976;84: 1627.
  • 13
    McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record: a two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100: 1308.
  • 14
    Tierney WM, Overhage JM, Murray MD, et al. Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18: 96776.
  • 15
    Maviglia SM, Teich JM, Fiskio J, Bates DW. Using an electronic medical record to identify opportunities to improve compliance with cholesterol guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16: 5317.
  • 16
    Stamos TD, Shaltoni H, Girard SA, Parrillo JE, Calvin JE. Effectiveness of chart prompts to improve physician compliance with the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88: 14203, A8.
  • 17
    Murray MD, Harris LE, Overhage JM, et al. Failure of computerized treatment suggestions to improve health outcomes of outpatients with uncomplicated hypertension: results of a randomized controlled trial. Pharmacotherapy. 2004;24: 32437.
  • 18
    Grimshaw JM, Russell IT. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993;342: 131722.
  • 19
    Hunt D, Haynes R, Hanna S, Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 1998;280: 133946.
  • 20
    McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, et al. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100: 1308.
  • 21
    Dexter PR, Perkins S, Overhage JM, Maharry K, Kohler RB, McDonald CJ. A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med. 2001;345: 96570.
  • 22
    Overhage JM, Tierney WM, Zhou XH, McDonald CJ. A randomized trial of “corollary orders” to prevent errors of omission. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997;4: 36475.
  • 23
    McDonald C. Use of a computer to detect and respond to clinical events: its effect on clinician behavior. Ann Intern Med. 1976;84: 1627.
  • 24
    Litzelman DK, Dittus RS, Miller ME, Tierney WM. Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8: 3117.
  • 25
    Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care. Effects on physician compliance. Med Care. 1986;24: 65966.
  • 26
    McDonald CJ. Computer reminders, the quality of care and the nonperfectability of man. N Engl J Med. 1976;295: 13515.
  • 27
    Schellhase KG, Koepsell TD, Norris TE. Providers' reactions to an automated health maintenance reminder system incorporated into the patient's electronic medical record. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003;16: 3127.
  • 28
    Barnett GO. The application of computer based medical record systems in ambulatory practice. N Engl J Med. 1984;310: 164350.
  • 29
    Rabbani U, Morgan M, Barnett O. A COSTAR interface using WWW technology. Proc AMIA Symp. 1998;7037.
  • 30
    NCEP Expert Panel. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285: 248697.
  • 31
    Roper WL, Baker EL, Dyal WW, Nicola RM. Strengthening the public health system. Public Health Rep. 1992;107: 60915.
  • 32
    Bakken S. An informatics infrastructure is essential for evidence-based practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001;8: 199201.
  • 33
    Information for health: a strategy for building the national health information infrastructure report and recommendations. National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics. Available at http://aspe.hhs.gov/sp/nhii/Documents/nhiilayo.pdf. Accessed on December 20, 2004.
  • 34
    Transforming health care: the President's health information technology plan. Available at http://aspe.hhs.gov/sp/nhii/news/WhiteHouseITPlan.pdf. Accessed on December 20, 2004.
  • 35
    Research in Action, Issue 6. Medical Informatics for Better and Safer Health Care Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/data/informatics/informatria.pdf. Accessed on December 20, 2004.
  • 36
    Demakis JG, Beauchamp C, Cull WL, et al. Improving residents' compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results from the VA cooperative study on computerized reminders. JAMA. 2000;284: 14116.
  • 37
    Hofer TP, Hayward RA, Greenfield S, Wagner EH, Kaplan SH, Manning WG. The unreliability of individual physician “report cards” for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease. JAMA. 1999;281: 2098105.
  • 38
    Balas EA, Boren SA, Brown GD, Ewigman BG, Mitchell JA, Perkoff GT. Effect of physician profiling on utilization. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11: 58490.
  • 39
    Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines?. A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282: 145865.
  • 40
    Tunis SR, Hayward R, Wilson MC, et al. Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120: 95663.
  • 41
    Patterson ES, Nguyen AD, Halloran JP, Asch SM. Human factors barriers to the effective use of ten HIV clinical reminders. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11: 509.
  • 42
    Blumenthal D, Causino N, Chang Y, et al. The duration of ambulatory visits to physicians. J Fam Pract. 1999;48: 26471.