• primary care;
  • racial disparities


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References

Background: Little is known about racial disparities in primary care at the level of the office visit.

Objective: To assess racial disparities in the receipt of commonly performed/recommended procedures during routine primary care office visits and examine trends in disparities over time.

Design, Setting, and Patients: The sample included 88,303 visits by adults to 3,260 primary care physicians in office-based practices in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, 1985, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, and 1995 to 2001.

Measurements: Adjusted odds for receipt or recommendation of commonly performed office procedures.

Results: During the years 1985 to 2001, African Americans, compared with whites, had lower odds of receiving a Pap test (odds ratio (OR) 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 0.93), rectal exam (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.80), smoking cessation counseling (OR 0.80; 95% CI 0.66 to 0.96), and mental health advice (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.69), but had higher odds for visual screening (OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.77), weight advice counseling (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.44) and receiving a follow-up appointment (OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.29 to 1.64). These findings were not appreciably altered by adjustment for physician practice characteristics including percent African American or Medicaid patients. Disparities disfavoring African Americans in cholesterol testing and smoking cessation observed during 1985 to 1992 were not observed in 1995 to 2001.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that race is associated with the type of primary care received by patients, at least for selected procedures, with evidence that some disparities have diminished over time.

In its report on racial disparities, the Institute of Medicine concluded that “racial and ethnic minorities tend to receive a lower quality of health care than nonminorities, even when access-related factors, such as patients' insurance status and income, are controlled.”1 Most investigations of disparities have focused on technological and hospital care, where evidence suggests that some disparities may be decreasing.2,3

Teasing out the relative contribution of provider and patient factors is challenging and relatively few studies have attempted to isolate the potential contribution of primary care provider bias to disparities. Based on data from directly observed office visits among Ohio family physicians, Williams et al.4 failed to find racial disparities in provision primary care services although physicians spent less time with African-American patients planning treatment, providing health education, chatting, assessing patients' health knowledge, and answering questions.5 Other studies using different methodologies show evidence of disparities among primary care providers.6–10 These studies, however, have been limited by selected physician samples, small sample sizes, and patient recall.

Because of the limited information about possible disparities in primary care, and conflicting results from existing primary care studies, we assessed disparities in primary care using national data for primary care office visits. These data primarily reflect procedures recommended or conducted by the physician at the time of the visit. We also examined whether there have been changes in disparities over the last 20 years, a time period that has seen increasing attention given to the problem of disparities in care.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References


The data for this study were derived from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (NAMCS) for 1985 to 2001. The survey was not conducted from 1986 to 1988 and different versions were used in 1993 and 1994. A nationally representative sample of office-based physicians completed a short survey on approximately 20 patient encounters. Complete details about the surveys are available at

The subset of encounters selected for this analysis were visits by African-American or white patients 18 years of age and older to primary care physicians (internists, family physicians, and obstetrician–gynecologists). Visits that were the result of a referral were excluded (given our focus on primary care). Elements were selected for analysis based on a review of the current literature on racial disparities and those activities performed frequently enough in the surveys to generate stable estimates. These included advice giving (exercise, diet, cholesterol, smoking cessation, breast health, and mental health), prevention procedures (Pap test, mammogram in women over 40 years, breast examination, pelvic examination, rectal examination, blood pressure check, vision examination, cholesterol test, and prostate-specific antigen testing in men over 50 years), visit duration, and follow-up plans (specific follow-up and referral to another physician).

Case-Mix and Competing Demands Adjustment

Case-mix adjustment was based on the Ambulatory Care Groups (ACG) System11 using the Ambulatory Diagnostic Groups (ADGs) of the ACG system. The ADGs comprise 32 diagnostic and preventive clusters to which each International Classification of Diseases diagnostic and preventive code can be uniquely assigned. Each patient is assigned a series of dummy (0, 1) values for each ADG depending on the up to three diagnoses assigned by the physician for the visit. Ambulatory Diagnostic Groups have previously been used to adjust case-mix for several studies involving NAMCS.12–15 Comorbidity measured in this way has been found to increase with patient age and distinguishes type of primary care delivery site by morbidity burden.14 We also included an adjustment for number of medications prescribed, both as an additional measure of morbidity16 and a measure of competing demands;17 that is, we considered the number of medications prescribed as a proxy for the extent of issues competing for the attention of both physician and patient during the encounter. In this data set, the number of medications prescribed correlated with both number of ADGs (r=.21) and age (r=.31).

Statistical Analyses

National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys uses a complex survey design, involving the clustering of visits within physician. The data were analyzed with STATA (Version 8.2, StataCorp, College Station, Tex) to adjust for both the sampling design and weights. The weights on the public-use data adjust each physician–patient encounter according to its sampling probability and the probability of physician nonresponse to yield unbiased national estimates of annual total visits. In all analyses, we adjusted for the clustering of patients within physician using the robust Huber–White sandwich estimator of variance.18 This variance estimator produces “correct” standard errors even though observations within clusters may be correlated.

The relationship between patient race (African American vs white) and each visit characteristic was examined with logistic regression, except visit duration, which was examined using linear regression. We adjusted for potential confounding by physician specialty, whether or not the patient was seen before, patient socio-demographics (age, gender, insurance status (Medicaid or not, Medicare or not), community size (rural or not), and region of the country (NorthEast, MidWest, South, or West)), year of visit, and case-mix (based on the number of medications prescribed and the ADGs coded). In separate analyses, we examined for interactions between patient race and year of visit, the proportion of patients seen by the physician that were African American, and the proportion of patients seen by the physician that had Medicaid insurance.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References

The sample included 88,303 visits by adult patients (10.4% by African Americans) to 3,260 primary care providers (Table 1). Compared with white patients, African Americans were younger, more likely to reside in urban areas, to be female, have Medicaid coverage, reside in the South, and were prescribed more medications. African Americans were less likely to have Medicare or to have been seen previously.

Table 1. Characteristics of the Primary Care Patients and Their Physicians by Race
CharacteristicAfrican AmericansWhites
  1. Except where indicated, numbers are percentages, which are adjusted for sampling strategy. All differences, except number of ADGs coded, are statistically significant (P<.05).

  2. ADGs, Ambulatory Diagnostic Groups.

N (%)9,111 (10.6)79,192 (89.4)
Age (mean)47.649.9
Case-mix (mean numbers)
 Medications prescribed1.601.50
 ADGs coded1.721.73
 Seen previously88.790.6
Physician specialty
 Family/general practice39.145.8
 Internal medicine42.735.5
 Obstetrics and gynecology18.218.8

Unadjusted percentages of patients receiving procedures by race are presented in Table 2. African Americans, compared with whites, were less likely to have Pap smear screening, mammography, rectal or breast exams, mental health advice, breast self-exam advice, and smoking cessation counseling. African Americans were more likely to receive blood pressure testing, visual screening, dietary counseling, and be given a scheduled follow-up appointment.

Table 2. Characteristics of Primary Care Delivered by Race
African Americans (%)Whites (%)OR95% CI
  • N, sample size for characteristic; Years, years question was asked; OR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PSA, prostate-specific antigen.

  • *


Pap smear48,382All10.3*14.00.810.70 to 0.93*
Mammogram23,5171989 to 1992, 1997 to 20016.5*8.20.960.75 to 1.22
PSA testing8,6881995 to 20017.17.70.850.56 to 1.29
Cholesterol testing78,2011989 to 20018.49.20.930.78 to 1.12
Blood pressure taken88,303All75.2* to 1.30
Rectal exam69,9701985 to 1990, 1995 to 20004.4*70.670.56 to 0.80*
Breast exam47,8331985 to 1990, 1995 to 200013.2*16.20.920.79 to 1.06
Pelvic exam47,8331985 to 1990, 1995 to 200019.321.51.030.90 to 1.18
Vision screening83,0921985 to 20002.2*1.51.381.08 to 1.77*
Mental health advice48,5471995 to 20011.4*2.70.510.38 to 0.69*
Breast self-exam advice28,9761989, 1990, 1997 to 20004.6*6.20.860.66 to 1.13
Cholesterol advice48,0361989 to 19965. to 1.47
Exercise advice61,6691991 to 200112.812.61.070.91 to 1.26
Diet advice88,303All20.616.41.271.13 to 1.44*
Injury prevention advice43,3361995 to 20001.31.90.760.53 to 1.10
Smoking advice78,2011989 to 20013.4*4.00.800.66 to 0.96*
Return appointment75,6161985 to 1996, 1999 to 200168.8*60.91.451.29 to 1.64*
Referred to another MD55,8421985 to 1992, 1999 to 20014.55.20.890.72 to 1.10
Visit duration (mean) minutes88,303All16.216.5−0.46−1.01 to 0.13

Table 2 also shows, for the entire time period, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) that the physician performed/ordered a particular intervention. African Americans, compared with whites, had lower odds of receiving a Pap test, rectal exam, and mental health and smoking cessation advice, but had higher odds for visual screening, dietary advice counseling, and receiving a follow-up appointment. No significant interactions were observed in analyses including interactions between race of patient and the proportion of patients seen by the physician who had Medicaid insurance or were African American.

We found some evidence for improvement in disparities over time. Table 3 shows the adjusted ORs for racial disparities stratified by 2 time periods: 1985 to 1992 and 1995 to 2001. These data are not presented for procedures that were reported during only 1 time period. Table 2 shows the time period the procedure was reported; for example, mental health advice was reported only in the years 1995 to 2001. Analyses including an interaction term between time and race revealed a significant (P<.05) trend for a narrowing of racial disparities disfavoring African Americans only for smoking cessation counseling; racial disparity in smoking cessation counseling was no longer apparent in the 1995 to 2001 time period (Table 3). Although the interaction with time was not statistically significant (P=.061), disparities in cholesterol testing observed in the earlier time period were no longer statistically significant by 1995 to 2001. In 2 areas where the disparity favored African Americans (blood pressure being recorded and dietary counseling), the difference narrowed significantly.

Table 3. Characteristics of Primary Care Delivered by Race and Time Period
Characteristic1985 to 19921995 to 2001
OR95% CIOR95% CI
  1. OR, adjusted odds ratio for African Americans receiving procedure compared with whites; CI, confidence interval.

Pap smear0.790.65 to 0.950.820.66 to 1.02
Mammogram0.930.62 to 1.381.050.78 to 1.42
Cholesterol testing0.700.49 to 0.971.000.80 to 1.26
Blood pressure taken1.281.02 to 1.620.970.83 to 1.14
Rectal exam0.670.47 to 0.960.660.55 to 0.81
Breast exam0.930.69 to 1.250.900.76 to 1.07
Pelvic exam1.000.79 to to 1.23
Vision screening1.240.84 to 1.841.471.05 to 2.04
Breast self-exam advice0.870.56 to 1.340.850.62 to 1.17
Cholesterol advice1.180.87 to 1.610.940.64 to 1.37
Exercise advice1.320.91 to 1.900.950.81 to 1.11
Diet advice1.461.19 to 1.791.070.94 to 1.22
Smoking advice0.570.41 to 0.810.950.77 to 1.18
Return appointment1.571.32 to 1.871.291.11 to 1.49
Referred to another MD0.900.68 to 1.180.910.66 to 1.25
Visit duration (mean) minutes−0.36−1.35 to 0.64−0.50−1.06 to 0.07


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References

Analyses of nationally representative data from primary care office visits show that at any 1 visit, African Americans are less likely to receive rectal examinations, Pap smears, and mental health advice, but are more likely to receive visual screening, dietary counseling, and a follow-up appointment. There was some improvement in racial disparities over time. Disparities disfavoring African Americans in cholesterol testing and smoking cessation counseling were not observed in more recent years. Interestingly, racial disparity in actual smoking cessation has also recently narrowed.19

The reasons for disparities in some areas, but not others are not known. Significant disparities were observed for procedures involving intimate physical (Pap testing and rectal examination) or emotional contact (mental health counseling). Racial disparity was also observed in smoking cessation counseling, but this disparity was confined to earlier years of the survey. Whether greater social distance may account for disparities in some of these procedures is not known.20 Social distance refers to levels of intimacy between different social groups based on friendships, partnerships, and cultural similarity.21 Physicians may be less comfortable suggesting and/or performing procedures that breach traditional physical or emotional boundaries with patients from different social groups.

We were not able to evaluate racial concordance between patients and their physicians. Although African-American patients are more likely to be seen by African-American physicians, the majority of African-American patients are nonetheless seen by white physicians.22,23 Data are mixed regarding the benefits of patient–physician racial concordance on care.24–28 Thus, further study is needed to explore the role of social distance, including racial concordance, in primary care disparities.

Racial disparity in smoking cessation counseling has been previously noted using national data,29 but the finding of racial disparity in Pap testing conflicts with self-report data showing no disparity.30,31 However, it is known that patients tend to perceive the interval since their most recent screening procedure as shorter than the true interval (known as telescoping).32–34 Some evidence suggests a discrepancy, by race, in the tendency to telescope.35–37 In other words, racial differences in self-reporting may mask true disparity in receipt of some preventive services.38

The findings of this study are consistent with the hypothesis that race affects the type of primary care received by patients. It is possible that the observed disparities in primary care result from African-American patients obtaining care from physicians with different practice styles.22 Bach et al.22 using self-report data from a nationally representative sample of physicians and Medicare claims data, found that physicians caring for African-American patients were more likely to face a number of barriers to providing optimal care, but the authors did not report on differences in actual care. We observed that adjusting for the proportion of patients seen by each physician that were African American or that had Medicaid insurance did not appreciably alter our findings. Similarly, the absence of significant differences in visit duration suggests that these differences cannot be attributable to shorter visits for African-American patients.

African Americans were more likely to receive procedures in three areas: vision screening, dietary advice, and scheduled follow-up. Higher rates of vision screening may reflect lower access to ophthalmologic specialty care and higher rates of glaucoma, hypertension, and diabetes among African Americans.38–42 Higher rates of weight advice probably reflect higher rates of obesity, particularly among African-American women.43 Higher rates of scheduled follow-up may represent inadequate adjustment for case-mix or disease severity.

Interestingly, disparities (both those favoring African Americans and whites) that have narrowed over time are all related to cardiovascular risk (blood pressure, cholesterol testing, smoking cessation, and dietary counseling). We speculate that this improvement may reflect improved cardiovascular risk management over time, perhaps related to the introduction and dissemination of guidelines and/or effective new drugs (e.g., statins, smoking cessation agents). If this explanation is correct, it suggests that standardization of care through guidelines offers potential for reducing racial disparities in health care.

Given the limitations of these data, our findings likely underestimate racial disparities in primary care. Although NAMCS is a national survey of office-based care provided in the United States, analyses were conducted at the visit level, not the patient level. African Americans receive fewer visits for routine ambulatory care,44 reflected in this data set by the lower likelihood of African Americans having been seen previously. Fewer visits mean that physicians must attend to more tasks, including preventive services, at any 1 visit with African Americans, not less. In theory, this should result in higher rates of preventive care for African Americans at any 1 visit—although with increased competing demands prevention may receive a lower priority.17 Second, in most instances the OR pointed in the direction of a disparity favoring whites; limited power may have precluded the detection of statistically significant effects in other areas. Conversely, statistical testing of 19 procedures increases the risk of chance findings labeled significant. Third, self-reported data by physicians may lead to underestimation of racial disparity in their care. A comparison of NAMCS with direct observation of office visits showed high specificity (range 90% to 99%) for office procedures/counseling, but moderate to low sensitivity (range 0.12 to 0.84).45 This measurement error would bias results towards the null.

Potentially, unmeasured differences in morbidity contributed to disparities in care. When confronted with greater patient morbidity, physicians spend less time on prevention17 or smoking cessation counseling,46 conduct less depression screening,47 and are less likely to recommend preventive services such as mammography or hormone replacement therapy.48 However, we observed similar findings without and with adjustment for case-mix and number of medications prescribed at the visit, suggesting that confounding by these measured factors was modest. It is also possible that physicians planned to defer procedures for African Americans to the next visit as suggested by higher rates of scheduled follow-up appointments, but neglected to do so at that visit. However, adjustment for scheduled follow-up visits did not alter the findings (results not shown).

Other limitations reflect, in part, the nature of NAMCS. These include use of a short data collection form, limiting acquisition of possibly important covariates, physician (as opposed to self-identified) assessment of patient race, and the absence of direct validation of the collected data. A major limitation is the inability to assess the appropriateness of a given element of care at a given visit, especially given the incomplete assessment of competing priorities. The results are also representative of care provided by physicians in office practice, not of all patients obtaining medical care. Roughly 15% of primary care visits by African Americans are obtained in hospital clinics.14 However, the data set available to capture that information, the companion National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey, provides no information about the specific physicians seeing the patients. Information about the characteristics of physicians seeing African-American and white patients might yield additional insight into the reasons for some of the disparities seen here.22 Last, we could not evaluate the rates of patient refusal of procedures. However, we are not aware of any data suggesting that patient refusals contribute to the disparities we observed.

In summary, these findings based on physician-reported primary care visits suggest that African Americans are less likely to receive rectal exams, Pap smears, and mental health counseling. These findings do not appear to be explained by differences in case-mix, visit duration, or physician characteristics. Analyses of time trends suggest improvement in some areas. We hope that increased awareness of possible disparities in primary care may also result in a lessening of those disparities in the future.49


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References

Grant Support: Agency for Health care Research and Quality R01 HS 10910-01A2.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  6. Acknowledgments
  7. References
  • 1
    Institute of Medicine. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2002.
  • 2
    Academy of Health Services Research and Health Policy. Contributions of New Technologies to Racial Disparities in Healthcare. Washington, DC: Academy of Health Services Research and Health Policy; 2002.
  • 3
    Escarce JJ, McGuire TG. Changes in racial differences in use of medical procedures and diagnostic tests among elderly persons: 1986–1997. Am J Public Health. 2004;94: 17959.
  • 4
    Williams RL, Flocke SA, Stange KC. Race and preventive services delivery among black patients and white patients seen in primary care. Med Care. 2001;39: 12607.
  • 5
    Oliver MN, Goodwin MA, Gotler RS, Gregory PM, Stange KC. Time use in clinical encounters: are African-American patients treated differently? J Natl Med Assoc. 2001;93: 3805.
  • 6
    Schulman KA, Berlin JA, Harless W, et al. The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;340: 61826.
  • 7
    Wang TJ, Stafford RS. National patterns and predictors of beta-blocker use in patients with coronary artery disease. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158: 19016.
  • 8
    Stafford RS, Blumenthal D, Pasternak RC. Variations in cholesterol management practices of U.S. physicians. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29: 13946.
  • 9
    Taira DA, Safran DG, Seto TB, et al. Do patient assessments of primary care differ by patient ethnicity? Health Serv Res. 2001;36: 105971.
  • 10
    O'Malley MS, Earp JA, Harris RP. Race and mammography use in two North Carolina counties. Am J Public Health. 1997;87: 7826.
  • 11
    Weiner JP, Starfield BH, Steinwachs DM, Mumford LM. Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix. Med Care. 1991;29: 45272.
  • 12
    Blumenthal D, Causino N, Chang YC, et al. The duration of ambulatory visits to physicians. J Fam Pract. 1999;48: 26471.
  • 13
    Forrest CB, Reid RJ. Prevalence of health problems and primary care physicians' specialty referral decisions. J Fam Pract. 2001;50: 42732.
  • 14
    Forrest CB, Whelan EM. Primary care safety-net delivery sites in the United States: a comparison of community health centers, hospital outpatient departments, and physicians' offices. JAMA. 2000;284: 207783.
  • 15
    Franks P, Bertakis KD. Physician gender, patient gender, and primary care. J Women Health. 2003;12: 7380.
  • 16
    Perkins AJ, Kroenke K, Unutzer J, et al. Common comorbidity scales were similar in their ability to predict health care costs and mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57: 10408.
  • 17
    Chernof BA, Sherman SE, Lanto AB, Lee ML, Yano EM, Rubenstein LV. Health habit counseling amidst competing demands: effects of patient health habits and visit characteristics. Med Care. 1999;37: 73847.
  • 18
    Binder DA. On the variances of asymptotically normal estimators from complex surveys. Int Statist Rev. 1983;51: 27992.
  • 19
    King G, Polednak A, Bendel RB, Vilsaint MC, Nahata SB. Disparities in smoking cessation between African Americans and whites: 1990–2000. Am J Public Health. 2004;94: 196571.
  • 20
    Malat J. Social distance and patients' rating of healthcare providers. J Health Soc Behav. 2001;42: 36072.
  • 21
    Bottero W, Prandy K. Social interaction distance and stratification. Br J Sociol. 2003;54: 17797.
  • 22
    Bach PB, Pham HH, Schrag D, Tate RC, Hargraves JL. Primary care physicians who treat blacks and whites. N Engl J Med. 2004;351: 57584.
  • 23
    Laveist TA, Carroll T. Race of physician and satisfaction with care among African Americans. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94: 9374.
  • 24
    Saha S, Komaromy M, Koepsell TD, Bindman AB. Patient–physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159: 9971004.
  • 25
    Saha S, Arbelaez JJ, Cooper LA. Patient–physician relationships and racial disparities in the quality of health care. Am J Public Health. 2003;93: 17139.
  • 26
    Cooper LA, Roter DL, Johnson RL, Ford DE, Steinwachs DM, Powe NR. Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139: 90715.
  • 27
    Stevens GD, Shi L, Cooper LA. Patient-provider racial and ethnic concordance and parent reports of the primary care experiences of children. Ann Fam Med. 2003;1: 10512.
  • 28
    Laveist TA, Nuru-Jeter A, Jones KE. The association of doctor–patient race concordance with health services utilization. J Public Health Policy. 2003;24: 31223.
  • 29
    Doescher MP, Saver BG. Physicians' advice to quit smoking. The glass remains half empty. J Fam Pract. 2000;49: 5437.
  • 30
    Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer. 2003;97: 152840.
  • 31
    Martin LM, Calle EE, Wingo PA, Heath CW Jr. Comparison of mammography and Pap test use from the 1987 and 1992 National Health Interview Surveys: are we closing the gaps? Am J Prev Med. 1996;12: 8290.
  • 32
    May DS, Trontell AE. Mammography use by elderly women: a methodological comparison of two national data sources. Ann Epidemiol. 1998;8: 43944.
  • 33
    McGovern PG, Lurie N, Margolis KL, Slater JS. Accuracy of self-report of mammography and Pap smear in a low-income urban population. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14: 2018.
  • 34
    Champion VL, Menon U, McQuillen DH, Scott C. Validity of self-reported mammography in low-income African-American women. Am J Prev Med. 1998;14: 1117.
  • 35
    Caplan LS, Mandelson MT, Anderson LAHealth Maintenance Organization. Validity of self-reported mammography: examining recall and covariates among older women in a Health Maintenance Organization. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157: 26772.
  • 36
    McPhee SJ, Nguyen TT, Shema SJ, et al. Validation of recall of breast and cervical cancer screening by women in an ethnically diverse population. Prev Med. 2002;35: 46373.
  • 37
    Zapka JG, Bigelow C, Hurley T, et al. Mammography use among sociodemographically diverse women: the accuracy of self-report. Am J Public Health. 1996;86: 101621.
  • 38
    Fiscella K, Franks P, Meldrum S. Estimating racial/ethnic disparity in mammography rates: it all depends on how you ask the question. Prev Med. 2004;39: 399403.
  • 39
    Chiang YP, Wang F, Javitt JC. Office visits to ophthalmologists and other physicians for eye care among the U.S. population, 1990. Public Health Rep. 1995;110: 14753.
  • 40
    Congdon N, O'Colmain B, Klaver CC, et al. Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122: 47785.
  • 41
    Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, et al. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Diabetes Care. 1998;21: 51824.
  • 42
    Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988–2000. JAMA. 2003;290: 199206.
  • 43
    Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among U.S. adults, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288: 17237.
  • 44
    Greenblatt J. Statistical Brief #14 Trends in Access to Routine Care and Experiences with Care: 2001. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003.
  • 45
    Gilchrist VJ, Stange KC, Flocke SA, McCord G, Bourguet CC. A comparison of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) measurement approach with direct observation of outpatient visits. Med Care. 2004;42: 27680.
  • 46
    Jaen CR, Stange KC, Tumiel LM, Nutting P. Missed opportunities for prevention: smoking cessation counseling and the competing demands of practice. J Fam Pract. 1997;45: 34854.
  • 47
    Nutting PA, Rost K, Smith J, Werner JJ, Elliot C. Competing demands from physical problems: effect on initiating and completing depression care over 6 months. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9: 105964.
  • 48
    Nutting PA, Baier M, Werner JJ, Cutter G, Conry C, Stewart L. Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001;14: 35261.
  • 49
    Burgess DJ, Fu SS, Van Ryn M. Why do providers contribute to disparities and what can be done about it? J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19: 11549.