The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this article.
Voluntary Electronic Reporting of Medical Errors and Adverse Events
An Analysis of 92,547 Reports from 26 Acute Care Hospitals
Article first published online: 22 DEC 2005
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 21, Issue 2, pages 165–170, February 2006
How to Cite
Milch, C. E., Salem, D. N., Pauker, S. G., Lundquist, T. G., Kumar, S. and Chen, J. (2006), Voluntary Electronic Reporting of Medical Errors and Adverse Events. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21: 165–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00322.x
This study was supported in part by a Ruth Kirschstein Individual National Research Service Award grant from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
- Issue published online: 8 MAR 2006
- Article first published online: 22 DEC 2005
- Manuscript received March 3, 2005 Initial editorial decision September 15, 2005 Final acceptance September 26, 2005
- medical errors;
- adverse events;
- error reporting systems;
- electronic reporting
OBJECTIVE: To describe the rate and types of events reported in acute care hospitals using an electronic error reporting system (e-ERS).
DESIGN: Descriptive study of reported events using the same e-ERS between January 1, 2001 and September 30, 2003.
SETTING: Twenty-six acute care nonfederal hospitals throughout the U.S. that voluntarily implemented a web-based e-ERS for at least 3 months.
PARTICIPANTS: Hospital employees and staff.
INTERVENTION: A secure, standardized, commercially available web-based reporting system.
RESULTS: Median duration of e-ERS use was 21 months (range 3 to 33 months). A total of 92,547 reports were obtained during 2,547,154 patient-days. Reporting rates varied widely across hospitals (9 to 95 reports per 1,000 inpatient-days; median=35). Registered nurses provided nearly half of the reports; physicians contributed less than 2%. Thirty-four percent of reports were classified as nonmedication-related clinical events, 33% as medication/infusion related, 13% were falls, 13% as administrative, and 6% other. Among 80% of reports that identified level of impact, 53% were events that reached a patient (“patient events”), 13% were near misses that did not reach the patient, and 14% were hospital environment problems. Among 49,341 patient events, 67% caused no harm, 32% temporary harm, 0.8% life threatening or permanent harm, and 0.4% contributed to patient deaths.
CONCLUSIONS: An e-ERS provides an accessible venue for reporting medical errors, adverse events, and near misses. The wide variation in reporting rates among hospitals, and very low reporting rates by physicians, requires investigation.