Factors Associated with the Hospitalization of Low-risk Patients with Community-acquired Pneumonia in a Cluster-Randomized Trial
Article first published online: 1 JUN 2006
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Volume 21, Issue 7, pages 745–752, July 2006
How to Cite
Labarere, J., Stone, R. A., Scott Obrosky, D., Yealy, D. M., Meehan, T. P., Auble, T. E., Fine, J. M., Graff, L. G. and Fine, M. J. (2006), Factors Associated with the Hospitalization of Low-risk Patients with Community-acquired Pneumonia in a Cluster-Randomized Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21: 745–752. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00510.x
- Issue published online: 1 JUN 2006
- Article first published online: 1 JUN 2006
- Manuscript received November 11, 2005Initial editorial decision January 24, 2006Final acceptance March 10, 2006
- community-acquired infections;
- patient admission;
- risk factors;
- emergency service;
BACKGROUND: Many low-risk patients with pneumonia are hospitalized despite recommendations to treat such patients in the outpatient setting.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors associated with the hospitalization of low-risk patients with pneumonia.
METHODS: We analyzed data collected by retrospective chart review for 1,889 low-risk patients (Pneumonia Severity Index [PSI] risk classes I to III without evidence of arterial oxygen desaturation) enrolled in a cluster-randomized trial conducted in 32 emergency departments.
RESULTS: Overall, 845 (44.7%) of all low-risk patients were treated as inpatients. Factors independently associated with an increased odds of hospitalization included PSI risk classes II and III, the presence of medical or psychosocial contraindications to outpatient treatment, comorbid conditions that were not contained in the PSI (cognitive impairment, history of coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, or pulmonary disease), multilobar radiographic infiltrates, and home therapy with oxygen, corticosteroids, or antibiotics before presentation. While 32.8% of low-risk inpatients had a contraindication to outpatient treatment and 47.1% had one or more preexisting treatments, comorbid conditions, or radiographic abnormalities not contained in the PSI, 20.1% had no identifiable risk factors for hospitalization other than PSI risk class II or III.
CONCLUSIONS: Hospital admission appears justified for one-third of low-risk inpatients based upon the presence of one or more contraindications to outpatient treatment. At least one-fifth of low-risk inpatients did not have a contraindication to outpatient treatment or an identifiable risk factor for hospitalization, suggesting that treatment of a larger proportion of such low-risk patients in the outpatient setting could be achieved without adversely affecting patient outcomes.