Usefulness of Thrombelastography for Dosage Monitoring of Low Molecular Weight Heparin and Unfractionated Heparin During Hemodialysis
Version of Record online: 12 NOV 2008
© 1990 International Society for Artificial Organs
Volume 14, Issue 6, pages 413–415, December 1990
How to Cite
Shinoda, T., Arakura, H., Katakura, M., Shirota, T. and Nakagawa, S. (1990), Usefulness of Thrombelastography for Dosage Monitoring of Low Molecular Weight Heparin and Unfractionated Heparin During Hemodialysis. Artificial Organs, 14: 413–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1990.tb02996.x
- Issue online: 12 NOV 2008
- Version of Record online: 12 NOV 2008
- Received February 1990; revised April 1990.
- Low molecular weight heparin;
- Anti-Xa activity;
- Dialyzer clotting
Abstract: Low molecular weight heparin (LMH) acts as an anticoagulation agent mainly through its anti-activated coagulation factor X (Xa) activity. Thrombelastography (TEG) is expected to be useful to monitor the dosage of LMH during hemodialysis because reaction time on TEG (TEG-r) is considered to reflect blood thromboplastin formation time, which depends on the formation of Xa. To test this possibility, we compared the usefulness of TEG, activated coagulation time (ACT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and anti-Xa activity in 28 hemodialysis patients using both conventional unfractionated heparin (UFH) and LMH on separate dialysis procedures. Anti-Xa activity of LMH was comparable to that of UFH when it was measured using both LMH and UFH as standards. Anti-Xa activity, which theoretically depended on the heparin concentration in blood samples, did not correlate with the degree of dialyzer clotting. The APTT correlated well with anti-Xa activity in patients using LMH (r = 0.686, p > 0.01) and UFH (r = 0.906, p > 0.01), but not with the degree of dialyzer clotting. The TEG-r correlated well with the degree of dialyzer clotting both in patients using LMH and those using UFH (measurements of samples obtained from the venous side of the extracorporeal circuit) and weakly correlated with anti-Xa activity in patients using LMH (r = 0.402, p > 0.05). The ACT did not correlate with the degree of dialyzer clotting or anti-Xa activity. These results suggest that TEG-r reflects the efficacy of heparin in the extracorporeal blood circuit, whereas APTT mainly reflects heparin concentration of the blood samples. It appears TEG is useful for dosage monitoring of LMH as well as UFH during hemodialysis.