SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • biodiversity;
  • climate change;
  • conservation;
  • freshwater;
  • hotspot;
  • river restoration;
  • temperature

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

Global biodiversity hotspots contain exceptional concentrations of endemic species in areas of escalating habitat loss. However, most hotspots are geographically constrained and consequently vulnerable to climate change as there is limited ability for the movement of species to less hostile conditions. Predicted changes to rainfall and temperature will undoubtedly further impact on freshwater ecosystems in these hotspots. Southwestern Australia is a biodiversity hotspot and, as one of the first to experience significant climate change, is an example and potentially a global bellwether for issues associated with river restoration. In this hotspot, current and predicted water temperatures may exceed thermal tolerances of aquatic fauna. Gondwanic aquatic fauna, characteristic of southwestern Australia, are typically cold stenotherms and consequently intolerant of elevated temperatures. The hotspot in southwestern Australia is geographically restricted being surrounded by ocean and desert, and many important national parks are located on the extreme south coast, where the landscape is relatively flat. Consequently, fauna cannot change their distribution southwards or with altitude as a response to increasing temperatures. Therefore, any mitigation responses need to be in situ to produce a suitable biophysical envelope to enhance species' resilience. This could be through “over restoration” by increased riparian replanting at a catchment scale. A rule-of-thumb of a 10% increase in riparian cover would be required to reduce water temperatures by 1°C. These restoration techniques are considered applicable to other global biodiversity hotspots where geography constrains species' movement and the present condition is the desired restoration endpoint.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

Global biodiversity hotspots contain exceptional concentrations of endemic species in regions undergoing significant habitat loss (Myers et al. 2000). Global climate change is an additional threatening process with the capacity to further impact on hotspot biodiversity. Southwestern Australia is the only biodiversity hotspot present on the Australian continent (Hopper & Gioia 2004). The freshwater fauna of the region, for temperate Australia, is comparatively rich, with 24 amphibians and 8 species of freshwater fish (Pusey et al. 1989; Morgan et al. 1998). Over 300 freshwater invertebrate species have been identified (Horwitz et al. 2008), with high levels of regional endemism of species with Gondwanan affinities (Edward 1989; Bunn & Davies 1990). Over 5000 species of vascular plants occur in the region with over half considered endemic (Horwitz et al. 2008).

Global warming has been highlighted as an escalating threat to global biodiversity hotpots (Malcolm et al. 2006) and southwestern Australia was one of the first regions to undergo significant climate change (CSIRO 2007). This has been predominantly due to reduced rainfall and subsequent runoff (IOCI 2002) and increases in air temperature (IPCC 2007a). Across Australia including the southwest, average temperatures have increased by almost 1°C since 1910 (CSIRO 2007).

Climate predictions for the southwestern region are of increasingly dry and hot condition. These are dependent on the level of global intervention (based on Special Report on Emission Scenarios [SRES]; IPCC 2000) as A2, politically weak; and B1, politically strong (Nicholls 2006; IPCC 2007b). The A2 scenario describes a global response to mitigate climate change which is only marginally successful; but not the worse “business as usual” case. The B1 scenario represents a strong global response from early and aggressive commitment to both stabilization and subsequent reduction of greenhouse gas emissions (IPCC 2007b). The current and predicted climate conditions therefore represent a threat to biodiversity to southwestern Australia which is considered particularly vulnerable on a global scale (COAG 2007). Climate change in this region and restoration options serve as an example and bellwether to underpin planning in other hotspots.

Rainfall

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

The climate of temperate southwestern Australia is Mediterranean with hot, dry summers and cool, wet winters (Seddon 1972). Rainfall and streamflow are both highly seasonal and predictable (Bunn et al. 1986), leading to aquatic communities that are highly structured and temporally concordant among years (Bunn & Davies 2000). The region has experienced a substantial decline in rainfall since 1950 (CSIRO 2007; BOM 2007) with the larger changes occurring since 1965 (Li et al. 2005). The decline in rainfall was manifest in a shift to increased summer/spring rainfall and an associated decrease during autumn/winter (Cowan & Cai 2006). This is considered to be a consequence of changes in the Southern Hemisphere circulation decreasing the likelihood of storm development over southwestern Australia (IOCI 2002) partly due to disproportionate heating of the Indian Ocean off Western Australia (CSIRO & BOM 2007).

In Australia, a reduction in rainfall typically results in a disproportionately larger fall in streamflows (Chiew 2006). At present in southwestern Australia, a 20% reduction in rainfall since the mid-twentieth century has been accompanied by almost a 50% reduction in runoff (IPCC 2007a). The predictions to 2050 (and beyond) are of increased drying and heating (CSIRO 2007) with the intensity depending on the intervention scenario (IPCC 2007b). However, the drying effect of temperature alone on river flows is often neglected; the Murray Darling Basin drought was considered by some to be largely the consequence of temperature rather than reduced rainfall due to increased evapotranspiration rates (Cai & Cowan 2008a). After consideration of interdependencies, including the effect of rainfall and clouds on minimum temperatures, Cai and Cowan (2008b) concluded that in the Murray Darling Basin, a 1°C increase in maximum temperature resulted in a almost a 15% decrease in river flow.

Temperature

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

Anthropogenic forcing has led to global warming since the mid-twentieth century (IPCC 2007a) with mean surface temperatures increasing by 0.76°C since 1850 (IPCC 2007a). During the last 50 years, rates of warming have increased at an average of 0.13°C per decade with 11 of the past 12 years the warmest on record (IPCC 2007b). Current global temperatures are similar to the Holocene maximum and within about 1°C of the maximum temperature experienced in the past million years (Hansen et al. 2006).

Temperature increases have not been globally uniform and using a statistical downscaling of 0.8 for Australia (CSIRO 2007), averages have increased by 1–2°C since 1910 with warming greatest at night and in more inland locations. Warming of autumn/winter rather than summer/spring and increased minimums rather than maximums has led to reduced diurnal ranges (BOM 2007; CSIRO 2007). In southwestern Australia, temperatures have risen and predictions are a 0.2°C increase per decade for the next 30 years and a likely acceleration after this period under both A2 and B1 scenarios (Hennessy et al. 2007; Swan River Trust 2007).

Extreme Events

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

Disturbance is an important defining characteristic of stream and river communities (Lake et al. 2007). However, predicted increases in the frequency and intensity of extreme events due to climate change (IPCC 2007a) will expose river fauna and ecosystem processes to conditions probably not historically experienced potentially inhibiting recovery. In addition, following restoration, the increased frequency and intensity of extreme events including floods, droughts, and fires may limit revegetation efforts and damage associated infrastructure.

Impact on Freshwater Fauna

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

In southwestern Australia, flows in streams and rivers are both highly seasonal and predictable (Bunn et al. 1986). Freshwater fauna of the region show distinct responses to these predictable flow conditions with community structure fundamentally different between perennial and temporary systems (Bunn et al. 1986) and between seasons with distinctive summer/autumn and winter/spring assemblages (Bunn et al. 1986). Native freshwater fish undergo a seasonal reproductive migration tightly linked to flow with early spring “freshers,” a cue to initiate movement (Pen et al. 1991a). This has been shown for native fish including the western minnow (Pen et al. 1991b), pygmy perch (Pen & Potter 1991c), and nightfish (Pen & Potter 1990).

A reduction in flows or changes to the seasonality of flows may therefore result in the loss of migratory triggers and unseasonally low flows can expose in-stream barriers to migration (e.g. large woody material; Walker 1985). The historic flow paradigm (Poff et al. 1997) emphasizes the importance of natural (or historic) flows for the maintenance of aquatic biodiversity and ecological processes. Departures from natural flows, either through regulation and/or climate change, may therefore impact a range of aquatic species and supporting ecosystem processes. In addition, longitudinal connectivity maintained by flow is an important hydrological feature where downstream ecosystems are subsidized by carbon inputs from forested upland reaches (Davies & Bunn 1999).

Increasing water temperature can impact on freshwater systems by reducing dissolved oxygen levels and by increasing benthic respiration (Bunn et al. 1999). These two processes typically combine to drive river pools anoxic and can ultimately lead to fish kills (Bunn & Davies 1992). Dissolved oxygen at concentrations <2.0 mg/L is considered a critical threshold at which respiration becomes difficult for native fish (ANZECC/ARMCANZ 2000).

Increasing water temperature may also exceed thermal limits of freshwater fauna. Many freshwater species in southwestern Australia are Gondwanic in origin (Edward 1989; Horwitz 1997; Zwick 2000) and considered cold stenotherms (cool water species) (Bunn & Davies 1990). The thermal limits of the fauna of southwestern Australia have been determined by LD50 testing (Davies et al. 2004). A temperature of about 21°C was considered the upper limit for a range of sensitive freshwater insect taxa (e.g. Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera; Davies et al. 2004). This critical temperature was also suggested for a range of temperate species from studies elsewhere (e.g. De Kowzlowski & Bunting 1981; Quinn et al. 1994; Cox & Rutherford 2000). In southwestern Australia, this threshold temperature is often exceeded in upland streams flowing through cleared catchments (Rutherford et al. 2004) where the lack of riparian vegetation increases the irradiance into streams (Davies et al. 2002).

In small streams in southwestern Australia, dense riparian shade of 600–960 m along the streamside reduced water temperature by 4°C and cleared reaches resulted in similar levels of heating (Rutherford et al. 2004). Cooler water can be transported downstream improving conditions in more open or cleared areas. In southwestern Australia, summer temperature stress will be more exaggerated as high air temperatures co-occur with seasonal low flows.

Climate change predictions for southwestern Australia are of a 2°C increase by 2050. These temperatures may exceed historic conditions experienced by the biota and therefore outside the range of species' resilience. For example, recent bioclimatic modeling showed that many of the 92 species of Dryandra (terrestrial plants) on the extreme south coast of Western Australia are vulnerable to a temperature rise of as small as 1°C (Pouliquen-Young & Newman 2000). Increased temperature may also have other effects including influencing sex determination in species including turtles (e.g. McCarty 2001) leading to skewed sex ratios. Other temperature induced impacts include a mismatch of interactions between predator–prey, host–pathogen, and pollinators–flowering plants (McCarty 2001).

Lapse Rates

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

In the Northern Hemisphere, recent climate change has shifted the distribution of key biota (Root et al. 2003). This has been toward the pole for: plants (Crumpacker et al. 2001); butterflies (Parmesan et al. 1999; Crozier 2004); and birds (Hitch & Leberb 2006). Other movement has been to higher altitudes (e.g. Franco et al. 2006). Some impacts to amphibian species may be indirect thorough changes in the distribution of their pathogens (e.g. chytrid fungus; Pounds et al. 2006). Where movement has not been possible due to barriers, some species have become locally extinct (McCarty 2001).

Lapse rates are the average reduction in air temperature with increasing movement toward the poles or with increasing altitude. An environmental lapse rate with increasing altitude is about 6.5°C/km (Allaby 2004) which can vary with region. The large changes of temperature associated with altitude result in the observed rapid changes in montane communities (Grabherr et al. 1994). Toward the poles, a lapse rate of 1°C/145 km is the accepted reduction in temperature (Trapasso 2005). Consequently, if a 2°C increase in temperature in southwestern Australia is accepted a medium-term scenario, then for thermally sensitive species this is a movement of about 200 km further south or an increase in elevation of about 300 m.

Barriers to Movement

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

Distributional shifts of species away from unsuitable conditions can be hampered by both natural and artificial barriers. Landscape fragmentation would also limit distributional changes of species as a response to increasing temperature. In southwestern Australia, important national parks (e.g. the Stirling Range and the Fitzgerald River) are on the extreme south coast; limiting further southerly movement. Southwestern Australia is also characterized by an ancient weathered landscape with limited relief (Bettenay & Mulcahy 1972); the dominant topographic feature, the Darling Scarp, is only 250–300 m above sea level. Consequently, there is no capacity for movement further south and limited ability for movement to higher altitudes.

Some southerly movement of biota may be possible from the more northerly regions of southwestern Australia. However, as most streams and rivers in this region run east–west, there is little opportunity for wholly aquatic species (e.g. fish and crustaceans) to cross catchment divides. Aquatic fauna with a terrestrial adult phase (e.g. holometabolous insects) would have some ability to cross catchment boundaries. However, this is limited by the extremely strong and consistent southwesterly winds which characterize southwestern Australia (Masselink & Pattiartchi 2001). These winds would limit southerly movement of the generally weak-flying terrestrial insects.

Fragmentation

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

The already fragmented landscape of southwestern Australia is predicted to increase under climate change (Horwitz et al. 2008). The hotter and more arid climate will also alter the distribution of native vegetation and probably current land use practices in the region. Secondary salinization which currently impacts 30% of the region (NLWRA 2001) will increase due to clearing (Bari & Ruprecht 2003) to the extent where about one-third of the freshwater fauna will be at risk (Halse et al. 2003). Existing freshwater fauna are sensitive to small changes in salinity (Edward et al. 1994) and there is often a shift in salt-impacted rivers to salt lake fauna (Bunn & Davies 1992).

Mitigation

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

Southwestern Australia is surrounded by either ocean or deserts, with little relief. Consequently in situ restoration of rivers and streams is a practical response to climate change in the short to medium term. This may be partly achieved through better reserve design (Dunlop & Brown 2008), maintenance of off-reserve biodiversity, reducing other threats (e.g. secondary salinization; Halse et al. 2003) or through restoration that increases overall resilience. Another response is increasing the connectivity in the landscape through direct corridors or habitat “stepping stones.” This has been recommended for Dryandra species in the southwest (Pouliquen-Young & Newman 2000).

River Restoration

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

River restoration is a practical response to climate change both on and off reserves. However, using historic references or spatially fixed protected areas (Rutherford et al. 1999) for restoration targets may fail in the context of rapid climate shift (Harris et al. 2006). Therefore, appropriate restoration needs to consider future conditions to produce a suitable “bioclimatic envelope” within species' tolerances (see Harris et al. 2006).

In southwestern Australia, a model using data on vegetation, climatic conditions, water depth, bed materials, and flow (STREAMLINE; Rutherford et al. 1997) showed shade, provided by both riparian vegetation and topography (i.e. stream banks) could maintain upland streams below the 21°C threshold of sensitive freshwater fauna (Davies et al. 2004). The modeling showed that about 50–70% shade from riparian zones was required in the more southerly (Albany) to the more northerly (Perth) respectively, under typical flow conditions, to maintain rivers and streams below the thermal tolerance limits of aquatic fauna (Davies et al. 2002, 2004; Rutherford et al. 2004). As a rule-of-thumb, about 10% of increased shade is required for every 1°C rise in temperature. Replanting riparian zones, when targeted at upland streams, also leads to improvements in more open downstream reaches (Rutherford et al. 2004). Focusing revegetation on east–west running streams is also a priority as the sun “tracks” along this path increasing irradiance (see Davies et al. 2008) and planting on streambanks as close as practicable to the channel will maximize shade benefits. As southwestern Australia is in the Southern Hemisphere, the northern bank of east–west streams should be targeted for restoration as the effects on reducing irradiance into streams will be greater than replanting the southern banks (Davies et al. 2004, 2008).

Riparian revegetation is not an isolated response to increased temperature but will have other benefits for ecosystem function which are underpinned by existing theory (e.g. Lake 2001; Lake et al. 2007). Streams and rivers of southwestern Australia are reliant on intact riparian zones for; shade to limit nuisance algal growth (Bunn & Davies 2000), the input of terrestrial carbon to support aquatic food webs (Bunn et al. 1999; Davies & Bunn 1999), bank stability (Rutherfurd et al. 2004), and for woody material which is important aquatic habitat particularly for fish (Davies & Storey 1998). Any form of vegetation would provide shade and consequently temperature benefits, however other ecological benefits of riparian vegetation, including both the nature and timing of litter input (Bunn et al. 1986), emphasizes the value of replanting using local provenance species.

While riparian restoration will have immediate and with enhanced revegetation, preadapt the rivers for an increasingly hot future, many important ecological assets in southwestern Australia may require other methods of intervention including flow restoration (Table 1).

Table 1.  Climate change trends in southwestern Australia, probability of anthropogenic forcing, potential scenarios under different levels of political intervention, possible consequences, the potential ecological response, and proposed restoration actions.
Issue and Direction of the TrendEvidence of Anthropogenic ForcingFuture Trend Under A2 and B1 ScenariosPossible ConsequenceEcological ResponseRestoration Actions
  1. Modified after Swan River Trust (2007). The “issue and direction of the trend” based on CSIRO (2007). Categories in “Evidence of anthropogenic forcing” after IPCC (2007a). The A2 and B1 scenarios after the SRES of IPCC (2000). Environmental flows are shown as e-flows, biological oxygen demand as BOD.

Decrease in autumn rainfallVery likely >90%Likely >66%Pool anoxiaFish kills, release of some metals and nutrients from river sedimentsE-flows, fencing, and riparian revegetation
   Loss of longitudinal hydrological connectivityLoss of upstream carbon subsidyRemoval of artificial barriers
Decrease in winter rainfallVery likely >90%Extremely likely >95%Loss of reproductive triggersLocal extirpation of fishE-flows
   Loss of variability encouraging invasivesIncreased populations of competitive dominantsE-flows
   Exposing barriers to fish migrationLocal extirpation of fishRemoval of artificial barriers, weed management
Decrease in winter streamflowVery likely >90%Extremely likely >95%Reduced pool scouringLoss of pool habitatE-flows, pool dredging
   Build up of organic materialIncreased BOD, fish kills (during summer)E-flows
   Reduced riparian inundation and subsequent seed-setLonger-term degradation of riparian vegetationE-flows, fencing, and riparian revegetation
Escalating atmospheric warmingVirtually certain >99%Virtually certain >99%Exceedance thermal limits of sensitive faunaLocal extirpation of faunaFencing and riparian revegetation
   Increased benthic respirationIncreased BOD, anoxiaE-flows, fencing, and riparian revegetation
   Decreased dissolved oxygen levelsFish killsE-flows, fencing, and riparian revegetation
Increased evapotranspiration ratesMore likely than not >50%More likely than not >50%Reduced streamflow; shift to a temporary systemLoss of permanent river faunaE-flows
   Loss of hydrological connectivityLoss of upstream carbon subsidyE-flows
Increased fire hazardMore likely than not >50%Extremely likely >95%Loss of riparian vegetation leading to increased water temperatureLoss of sensitive speciesFencing and riparian revegetation
   Exceedance of thermal limitsLoss of sensitive speciesFencing and riparian revegetation
   Liberation of phosphorus; increased likelihood of algal bloomsDecreased water qualityFencing and riparian revegetation, fire management
Decrease in the intensity of winter flood flowsExtremely likely >95%Likely >66%Reduced pool scouringLoss of pool habitatE-flows, pool dredging
   Increased pool aggradation  
   Loss of longitudinal hydrological connectivityLoss upstream carbon subsidyE-flows
   Weed encroachment into channelsLoss of habitat, reduced high flow conveyanceWeed control
   Increased invasives (e.g. Typha, Gambusia)Increased competitive dominantsE-flows, weed control
Increased frequency of droughtVery likely >90%Extremely likely >95%Shift to temporary systemsLoss permanent river faunaE-flows
   Loss of refugia (pool water quality)Local extirpation of faunaFencing (pools) and riparian revegetation, e-flows
Increased sea and estuary levelsVirtually certain >99%Virtually certain >99%Loss of floodplain habitatReduced fish recruitmentReserve design, removal of artificial barriers
Increased frequency of warm spells/ heat wavesLikely >66%Extremely likely >95%Pool anoxiaLocal loss of pool faunaFencing and riparian revegetation, e-flows
   Exceedance thermal limitsLocal extirpation of sensitive speciesFencing and riparian revegetation, e-flows

Flow Restoration

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

Many important processes in rivers are regulated by the magnitude, frequency, and seasonality of flows (Poff et al. 1997). Restoration responses including environmental flows (e-flows) can maintain important ecosystem processes and biodiversity (Table 1). Changes to the natural flow regime may impact on cues for fish migration, seasonality of insect emergence, floodplain inundation, and riparian recruitment. E-flows, such as reservoir releases, could be used to reestablish important components of the historic flow regime. However, in a drying environment, it has proved difficult to secure e-flows and the distribution of dams and reservoirs in global hotspots is typically limited and usually restricted to the main stem of rivers minimizing benefits to tributaries.

Translation to Other Hotspots

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED

Southwestern Australia was the first global biodiversity hotspot to experience significant climate change and consequently serves as a bellwether and an example of potential restoration responses. Most biodiversity hotspots will experience global warming (see IPCC 2007a) and all are geographically restricted. For example, many hotspots are islands or island chains (i.e. Madagascar-Indian Ocean Islands, New Zealand, the Caribbean, New Caledonia, Japan, and Polynesia–Micronesia). Other hotspots of Gondwanic origin (e.g. Western Ghats/Sri Lanka and the Cape Floristic Province) share common origins with southwestern Australia and consequently potentially the temperature tolerances of the cold stenotherm fauna.

In summary, in situ “over restoration” is a practical response for climate change to establish a short–medium-term biophysical envelope in biodiversity hotspots where the desired ecological endpoint is the present condition.

Implications for Practice

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED
  • Climate change in the southwestern Australian biodiversity hotspot may serve as a bellwether for other global hotspots.
  • Due to increased drying and warming, restoration of rivers and streams in some global hotspots will require interventions including targeted riparian replanting and environmental flows.
  • Riparian replanting will increase shade; decreasing water temperatures to levels below thermal limits of sensitive aquatic fauna.
  • Improvements in water temperature may be “transported” downstream to lower, more open reaches.
  • “Over restoration” (through riparian revegetation) using local provenance species is recommended for in situ maintenance of aquatic biodiversity and ecosystem processes.
  • Restoration of east–west upland streams, particularly the north bank (in the Southern Hemisphere), is considered a priority.
  • In southwestern Australia, a 10% increase in riparian revegetation is required for a 1°C decrease in water temperature. This is considered transferable to other global hotspots, particularly those of similar Gondwanan origin.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Rainfall
  5. Temperature
  6. Extreme Events
  7. Impact on Freshwater Fauna
  8. Lapse Rates
  9. Barriers to Movement
  10. Fragmentation
  11. Mitigation
  12. River Restoration
  13. Flow Restoration
  14. Translation to Other Hotspots
  15. Implications for Practice
  16. Acknowledgments
  17. LITERATURE CITED
  • Allaby, M. 2004. A dictionary of ecology (available from http://www.encyclopedia.com) accessed 18 October 2009.
  • ANZECC/ARMCANZ. 2000. Australian and New Zealand Water quality guidelines. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra. (Available from http://www.deh.gov.au/water/quality/nwqms/index.html#quality) accessed 2 September 2009.
  • Bari, M. A., and J. K. Ruprecht. 2003. Water yield response to land use change in south-west Western Australia. Salinity and Land Use Impacts Series. Report SLUI 31. Department of Environment, Perth, Western Australia.
  • Bettenay, E., and M. J. Mulcahy. 1972. Soil and landscape studies in Western Australia. II. Valley form and surface features of the south-west drainage division. Journal of the Geological Society of Australia 18:359369.
  • BOM (Bureau of Meteorology). 2007. Global climate change and variability and Australian climate change and variability (available from http://www.bom.gov.au/silo/products/cli_chg/) accessed 2 September 2009.
  • Bunn, S. E., and P. M. Davies. 1990. Why is the stream fauna of the south-west of Western Australia so impoverished? Hydrobiologia 194:169176.
  • Bunn, S. E., and P. M. Davies. 1992. Community structure and water chemistry of a salinised river system in south-western Australia. Hydrobiologia 248:143160.
  • Bunn, S. E., P. M. Davies, and T. Mosisch. 1999. Ecosystem measures of river health and their response to riparian and catchment degradation. Freshwater Biology 41:333345.
  • Bunn, S. E., and P. M. Davies. 2000. Biological processes in running waters and their implications for the assessment of ecological integrity. Hydrobiologia 422/423:6170.
  • Bunn, S. E., D. H. Edward, and N. R. Loneragan. 1986. Spatial and temporal variation in the macroinvertebrate fauna of streams of the northern jarrah forest, Western Australia: community structure. Freshwater Biology 16:6791.
  • Cai, W., and T. Cowan. 2008a. Dynamics of late autumn rainfall reduction over southeastern Australia. Geophysical Research Letters 35:L09708, DOI: 10.1029/2008GL033727.
  • Cai, W., and T. Cowan. 2008b. Evidence of impacts from rising temperature on inflows to the Murray-Darling Basin. Geophysical Research Letters 35:L07701, DOI: 10.1029/2008GL033390.
  • Chiew, F. H. S. 2006. An overview of methods for estimating climate change impact on runoff. Report for the 30th Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, 4–7th December, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia.
  • COAG. 2007. National climate change adaptation framework (available from http://www.coag.gov.au/coag_meeting_outcomes/2007-04-13/docs/national_climate_change_adaption_framework.pdf) accessed 8 September 2009.
  • Cowan, T., and W. Cai. 2006. SAM and regional rainfall in IPCC AR4 models: can anthropogenic forcing account for southwest Western Australian winter rainfall reduction? Geophysical Research Letters 33:L24708.
  • Cox, T. J., and J. C. Rutherford. 2000. Thermal tolerances of two stream invertebrates exposed to diurnally varying temperature. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 34:209215.
  • Crozier, L. 2004. Warmer winters drive butterflies range expansion by increasing survivorship. Ecology 85:231241.
  • Crumpacker, D. W., E. O. Box, and E. D. Hardin. 2001. Implications of climatic warming for conservation of native trees and shrubs in Florida. Conservation Biology 15:10081020.
  • CSIRO. 2007. Climate change in Australia—technical report 2007 (available from http://www.climatechangeinaustralia.gov.au). CSIRO, 2007. Climate change in Australia. Bibliography. ISBN 9781921232947.
  • CSIRO and BOM (Bureau of Meteorology). 2007. Climate change in Australia. Technical Report. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, 140pp.
  • Davies, P. M., and S. E. Bunn. 1999. Restoring fundamental ecological processes in small, forested uplands streams: the importance of riparian vegetation. Pages 193198 in I.Rutherfurd and R.Bartley, editors. Second Australian Stream Management Conference, Vol. 1. CRC for Catchment Hydrology, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Davies, P. M., S. E. Bunn, and S. K. Hamilton. 2008. Primary production in tropical streams and rivers. Pages 2342 in D.Dudgeon, editor. Tropical Stream Ecology. Elsevier, Inc., London, UK.
  • Davies, P. M., B. Cook, J. C. Rutherford, and T. Walshe. 2002. Managing high in-stream temperatures using riparian vegetation. Rip Rap 22:1220, ISSN 1445–3924.
  • Davies, P. M., B. Cook, J. C., Rutherford, and T. Walshe. 2004. Riparian restoration reduces in-stream thermal stress. Rip Rap 26:1619, ISSN 1324–6941.
  • Davies, P. M., and A. W. Storey. 1998. Large woody debris is important habitat in rivers. Western Wildlife 2:1415.
  • De Kowzlowski, S. J., and D. L. Bunting. 1981. A laboratory study of the thermal tolerance of four south-eastern stream insect species (Trichoptera, Ephemeroptera). Hydrobiologia 79:141145.
  • Dunlop, M., and P. R. Brown. 2008. Implications of climate change for Australia's National Reserve System: a preliminary assessment. Report to the Department of Climate Change, February 2008. Department of Climate Change, Canberra, Australia, ISBN 978–1–921297–73–1.
  • Edward, D. H. D. 1989. Gondwanaland elements in the Chironomidae (Diptera) of south-western Australia. Acta Biologica Oecologica Hungarica 2:181187.
  • Edward, D. H. D., P. Gazey, and P. M. Davies. 1994. Invertebrate community structure related to physico-chemical parameters of permanent lakes of the south coast of Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 77:5163.
  • Franco, A. M., J. K. Hill, C. Kitschke, Y. C. Collingham, D. B. Roy, R. Fox, B. Huntley, and C. D. Thomas. 2006. Impacts of climate warming and habitat loss on extinctions at species' low-latitude range boundaries. Global Climate Change Biology 12:15451553.
  • Grabherr, G. M., M. Gottfried, and H. Pauli. 1994. Climate effects on mountain plants. Nature 369:448448.
  • Halse, S. E., J. K. Ruprecht, and A. M. Pinder. 2003. Salinisation and prospects for biodiversity in rivers and wetlands of south-west Western Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 51:673688.
  • Hansen, J., M. Sato, R. Ruedy, K. Lo, D. Lea, and M. Medina-Elizade. 2006. Global temperature change. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences USA 103:1428814293.
  • Harris, J. A., R. J. Hobbs, E. Higgs, and J. Aronson. 2006. Ecological restoration and global climate change. Restoration Ecology 14:170176.
  • Hennessy, K. B., B. C. Fitzharris, P. Bates, N. Harvey, S. M. Howden, L. Hughes, J. Salinger and R. Warrick. 2007. Australia and New Zealand, climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II. Pages 504507 in M. L.Parry, O. F.Canziani, J. P.Palutikof, P. J.Van Der Linden, and C. E.Hanson, editors. Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Hitch, A. T., and P. I. Leberb. 2006. Breeding distributions of North American bird species moving north as a result of climate change. Conservation Biology 21:534539.
  • Hopper, S. D., and P. Gioia. 2004. The southwest Australian floristic region: evolution and conservation of a global hot spot of biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35:623650.
  • Horwitz, P. 1997. Comparative endemism and richness of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in peatlands and shublands of far south-western Australia. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 56:313321.
  • Horwitz, P., D. Bradshaw, S. Hopper, P. Davies, P. Froend, and F. Bradshaw. 2008. Hydrological change escalates risk of ecosystem stress in Australia's threatened biodiversity hotspot. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 91:111.
  • IOCI (Indian Ocean Climate Initiative). 2002. Climate variability and change in south-west WA (available from http://www.ioci.org.au) accessed 12 September 2009.
  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2000. Emission scenarios—special report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, UK. (Available from http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/reports.htm) accessed 8 October 2009.
  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007a. Climate change 2007—the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, Published for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007b. Fourth assessment report, summary for policy makers, Paris, Feb 2, 2007 (available from http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2-feb07.pdf) accessed 10 October 2009.
  • Lake, P. S. 2001. On the maturing of restoration: linking ecological research and restoration. Ecological Management and Restoration 2:110115.
  • Lake, P. S., N. Bond, and P. Reich. 2007. Linking ecological theory with stream restoration. Freshwater Biology 52:597615.
  • Li, Y., W. Cai, and E. P. Campbell. 2005. Statistical modelling of extreme rainfall in southwest Western Australia. Journal of Climate 18:852863.
  • Malcolm, J. R., C. Liu, R. P. Neilson, L. Hansen, and L. Hannah. 2006. Global warning and extinctions of endemic species from biodiversity hotspots. Conservation Biology 20:538548.
  • Masselink, G., and C. B. Pattiaratchi. 2001. Characteristics of the sea breeze system in Perth, Western Australia, and its effect on the nearshore wave climate. Journal of Coastal Research 17:173187.
  • McCarty, J. P. 2001. Ecological consequences of recent climate change. Conservation Biology 15:320331.
  • Morgan, D. L., H. S. Gill, and I. C. Potter. 1998. Distribution, identification and biology of freshwater fishes in south-western Australia. Records of the Western Australian Museum 56:197.
  • Myers, N., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. De Fonseca, and J. Kent. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature (London) 403:853858.
  • Nicholls, N. 2006. Detecting and attributing Australian climate change: a review. Australian Meteorological Magazine 55:199211.
  • NLWRA. 2001. Australian dryland salinity assessment 2000: extent, impacts, processes, monitoring and management options. National Land and Water Resources Audit, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
  • Parmesan, C., N. Ryrholm, S. Constantí, J. K. Hill, C. D. Thomas, H. Descimon, et al. 1999. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399:579583.
  • Pen, L. J., and I. C. Potter. 1990. Biology of the nightfish Bostockia porosa Castelnau in a south-western Australian river. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 41:627646.
  • Pen, L. J., and I. C. Potter. 1991a. Biology of the western minnow, Galaxias occidentalis Ogilby (Teleostei: Galaxiidae), in a south-western Australian river. Hydrobiologia 211:7788.
  • Pen, L. J., and I. C. Potter. 1991b. Biology of the western minnow Galaxias occidentalis Ogilby (Teleostei: Galaxiidae) in a south-western Australian River II. Size and age composition, growth and diet. Hydrobiologia 211:89100.
  • Pen, L. J., and I. C. Potter. 1991c. Biology of the western pygmy perch Edelia vittata and comparisons with two other teleost species endemic to south-western Australia. Environmental Biology of Fishes 31:365380.
  • Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks, and J. C. Stromberg. 1997. The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47:769784.
  • Pouliquen-Young, O., and P. Newman. 2000. The implications of climate change for land-based nature conservation strategies. Final Report 96/1306. Australian Greenhouse Office, Environment Australia, Canberra, and Institute for Sustainability and Technology Policy, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia.
  • Pounds, A. J., M. R. Bustamante, L. A. Coloma, A. Jamie, J. A. Consuegra, M. P. Fogden, et al. 2006. Widespread amphibian extinctions from epidemic disease driven by global warming. Nature 439:161167.
  • Pusey, B. J., A. W. Storey, P. M. Davies, and D. H. D. Edward. 1989. Spatial variation in fish communities in two south-western Australian river systems. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 71:6975.
  • Quinn, J. M., G. L. Steele, C. W. Hickey, and M. L. Vickers. 1994. Upper thermal tolerances of twelve New Zealand stream invertebrate species. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 28:391397.
  • Root, T. L., J. T. Price, K. R. Hall, S. H. Schneider, C. Rozenzweig, and J. A. Pounds. 2003. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:5760.
  • Rutherford, J. C., S. Blackett, C. Blackett, L. Saito, and R. J. Davies-Colley. 1997. Predicting the effects of shade on water temperature in small streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 31:707721.
  • Rutherfurd, I. D., A. R. Ladson, and M. J. Stewardson. 2004. Evaluating stream rehabilitation projects: reasons not to, and approaches if you have to. Australian Journal of Water Resources l8:5768.
  • Rutherford, J. C., N. A. Marsh, P. M. Davies, and S. E. Bunn. 2004. Effects of patchy shade on stream water temperatures; how quickly do small streams heat and cool? Marine Freshwater Research 55:737748.
  • Rutherford, M. C., L. W. Powrie, and R. E. Shultze. 1999. Climate change in conservation areas of South Africa and its potential impact on floristic composition: a first assessment. Diversity and Distributions 5:253262.
  • Seddon, G. 1972. A sense of place. University of Western Australia Press, Perth, Western Australia.
  • Swan River Trust. 2007. Potential impacts of climate change on the Swan and Canning rivers. Report Prepared for the Swan River Trust by the Technical Advisory Panel December 2007, Perth, Western Australia.
  • Trapasso, I. M. 2005. Temperature distribution. Pages 711716 in J. E.Oliver, editor. Encyclopedia of World Climatology. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. ISBN 1402032641.
  • Walker, K. F. 1985. A review of the ecological effects of river regulation in Australia. Hydrobiologia 125:111129.
  • Zwick, P. 2000. Phylogenetic system and zoogeography of the Plecoptera. Annual Review Entomology 45:709746.