Equally contributing authors.
tDCS-Induced Analgesia and Electrical Fields in Pain-Related Neural Networks in Chronic Migraine
Article first published online: 18 APR 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02141.x
© 2012 American Headache Society
Issue

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
Volume 52, Issue 8, pages 1283–1295, September 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
DaSilva, A. F., Mendonca, M. E., Zaghi, S., Lopes, M., DosSantos, M. F., Spierings, E. L., Bajwa, Z., Datta, A., Bikson, M. and Fregni, F. (2012), tDCS-Induced Analgesia and Electrical Fields in Pain-Related Neural Networks in Chronic Migraine. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 52: 1283–1295. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02141.x
Conflict of interest: The City University of New York has intellectual property on brain stimulation with Marom Bikson and Abhishek Datta as inventors.
- †
Equally contributing authors.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 SEP 2012
- Article first published online: 18 APR 2012
- Accepted for publication February 11, 2012.
Keywords:
- transcranial direct current stimulation;
- chronic migraine;
- motor cortex;
- neuromodulation;
- brain stimulation;
- chronic pain
Objective.— We investigated in a sham-controlled trial the analgesic effects of a 4-week treatment of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex in chronic migraine. In addition, using a high-resolution tDCS computational model, we analyzed the current flow (electric field) through brain regions associated with pain perception and modulation.
Methods.— Thirteen patients with chronic migraine were randomized to receive 10 sessions of active or sham tDCS for 20 minutes with 2 mA over 4 weeks. Data were collected during baseline, treatment and follow-up. For the tDCS computational analysis, we adapted a high-resolution individualized model incorporating accurate segmentation of cortical and subcortical structures of interest.
Results.— There was a significant interaction term (time vs group) for the main outcome (pain intensity) and for the length of migraine episodes (ANOVA, P < .05 for both analyses). Post-hoc analysis showed a significant improvement in the follow-up period for the active tDCS group only. Our computational modeling studies predicted electric current flow in multiple cortical and subcortical regions associated with migraine pathophysiology. Significant electric fields were generated, not only in targeted cortical regions but also in the insula, cingulate cortex, thalamus, and brainstem regions.
Conclusions.— Our findings give preliminary evidence that patients with chronic migraine have a positive, but delayed, response to anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex. These effects may be related to electrical currents induced in pain-related cortical and subcortical regions.

1526-4610/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=21f1b7d4f2c4359aaf47df570ce3e86bae828611)
1526-4610/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=457ac636b692c34a480c656754b5858bd52359be)