Get access

The Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Experimental Pain and Sympathetic Nervous System Response

Authors

  • John L. Reeves II PhD, ABPP,

    Corresponding author
    1. UCLA School of Dentistry, Section of Oral Medicine and Orofacial Pain, Los Angeles, California;
    2. The Pain Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Steven B. Graff-Radford DDS,

    1. UCLA School of Dentistry, Section of Oral Medicine and Orofacial Pain, Los Angeles, California;
    2. The Pain Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California;
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Diana Shipman MA, BCIAC

    1. Bellevue Hill, New South Wales, Australia
    Search for more papers by this author

John L. Reeves II, PhD, ABPP, P.O. Box 18157, Beverly Hills, CA 90209. Tel: (800) 853-0173; E-mail: reeves@ucla.edu.

ABSTRACT

Objective Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a technique widely used in clinical practice to control pain, although its clinical efficacy remains controversial. Though many mechanisms have been proposed for its analgesic effects, there is a conspicuous lack of experimentally controlled research investigating whether TENS analgesia is related to its effects on the sympathetic nervous system (SNS).

Methods Using an established psychophysiological paradigm, the present study investigated the effects of high-frequency/low-intensity TENS, low-frequency/high-intensity TENS, and sham TENS on the perception of experimental pain and SNS function in healthy volunteers. Measures of heart rate, digital pulse volume, and skin conductance were recorded during a 20-minute TENS stimulation period and in anticipation of a series of painful electric shocks prior to and following TENS stimulation. Healthy volunteers rated the intensity of the shocks using a 0–10-point verbal pain rating scale.

Results The three TENS conditions failed to differentially effect SNS responses during either the 20-minute TENS treatment period or the shock anticipation periods, and TENS did not affect ratings of pain intensity to the shock stimuli.

Conclusions While these results may not generalize to acute or chronic pain patients, within the limitations of the present experimental paradigm, no support was found for TENS affecting either SNS function or acute experimental pain perception.

Ancillary