1527-2001/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=0d57aaacc34a9d1036f084008a0896ec74efb011)
1527-2001/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=8964d550dbecdc749d6271a0906b205e6a18fb3c)
The End of Phenomenology: Bergson's Interval in Irigaray
Article first published online: 9 JAN 2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2000.tb00331.x
2000 by Hypatia, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
OLKOWSKI, D. E. (2000), The End of Phenomenology: Bergson's Interval in Irigaray. Hypatia, 15: 73–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2000.tb00331.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 9 JAN 2009
- Article first published online: 9 JAN 2009
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Luce Irigaray is often cited as the principle feminist who adheres to phenomenology as a method of descriptive philosophy. A different approach to Irigaray might well open the way to not only an avoidance of phenomenology's sexist tendencies, but the recognition that the breach between Irigaray's ideas and those of phenomenology is complete. I argue that this occurs and that Irigaray's work directly implicates a Bergsonian critique of the limits of phenomenology.