(Re)fusing the Amputated Body: An Interactionist Bridge for Feminism and Disability
Article first published online: 9 JAN 2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb00753.x
2001 by Hypatia, Inc.
Issue

Hypatia
Special Issue: Feminism and Disability, Part 1
Volume 16, Issue 4, pages 53–79, November 2001
Additional Information
How to Cite
SCHRIEMPF, A. (2001), (Re)fusing the Amputated Body: An Interactionist Bridge for Feminism and Disability. Hypatia, 16: 53–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb00753.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 9 JAN 2009
- Article first published online: 9 JAN 2009
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Disabled women's issues, experiences, and embodiments have been misunderstood, if not largely ignored, by feminist as well as mainstream disability theorists. The reason for this, I argue, is embedded in the use of materialist and constructivist approaches to bodies that do not recognize the interaction between “sex” and “gender” and “impairment” and “disability” as material-semiotic. Until an interactionist paradigm is taken up, we will not be able to uncover fully the intersection between sexist and ableist biases (among others) that form disabled women's oppressions. Relying on the understanding that sexuality is one such material-semiotic phenomenon, I examine the operation of interwoven biases in two disabled women's narratives.

1527-2001/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=0d57aaacc34a9d1036f084008a0896ec74efb011)
1527-2001/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=8964d550dbecdc749d6271a0906b205e6a18fb3c)