Feminists on the Inalienability of Human Embryos
Article first published online: 9 JAN 2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb00961.x
2006 by Hypatia, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Mcleod, C. and Baylis, F. (2006), Feminists on the Inalienability of Human Embryos. Hypatia, 21: 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb00961.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 9 JAN 2009
- Article first published online: 9 JAN 2009
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
The feminist literature against the commodification of embryos in human embryo research includes an argument to the effect that embryos are “intimately connected” to persons, or morally inalienable from them. We explore why embryos might be inalienable to persons and why feminists might find this view appealing. But, ultimately, as feminists, we reject this view because it is inconsistent with full respect for women's reproductive autonomy and with a feminist conception of persons as relational, embodied beings. Overall, feminists should avoid claims about embryos’ being inalienable to persons in arguments for or against the commodification of human embryos.

1527-2001/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=8964d550dbecdc749d6271a0906b205e6a18fb3c)
1527-2001/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=069a22ef1df2224a1fe1587d8cc23b505e0b162e)