Donna Haraway's Cyborg Touching (Up/On) Luce Irigaray's Ethics and the Interval Between: Poethics as Embodied Writing
Article first published online: 7 MAY 2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01198.x
© by Hypatia, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
TOYE, M. E. (2012), Donna Haraway's Cyborg Touching (Up/On) Luce Irigaray's Ethics and the Interval Between: Poethics as Embodied Writing. Hypatia, 27: 182–200. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01198.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 13 JAN 2012
- Article first published online: 7 MAY 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
In this article, I argue that Donna Haraway's figure of the cyborg needs to be reassessed and extricated from the many misunderstandings that surround it. First, I suggest that we consider her cyborg as an ethical concept. I propose that her cyborg can be productively placed within the ethical framework developed by Luce Irigaray, especially in relationship to her concept of the “interval between.” Second, I consider how Haraway's “cyborg writing” can be understood as embodied ethical writing, that is, as a contemporary écriture feminine. I believe that this cyborgian “writing the body” offers us a way of both creating and understanding texts that think through ethics, bodies, aesthetics, and politics together as part of a vital and relevant contemporary feminist ethics of embodiment. I employ the term “poethics” as a useful way to describe such a practice.

1527-2001/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=8964d550dbecdc749d6271a0906b205e6a18fb3c)
