Simone de Beauvoir and the Problem with de Sade: The Case of the Virgin Libertine
Article first published online: 12 MAY 2011
© by Hypatia, Inc.
Special Issue: Ethics of Embodiment
Volume 26, Issue 3, pages 461–477, Summer 2011
How to Cite
SINGLETON, B. (2011), Simone de Beauvoir and the Problem with de Sade: The Case of the Virgin Libertine. Hypatia, 26: 461–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01204.x
- Issue published online: 15 JUL 2011
- Article first published online: 12 MAY 2011
Reading Beauvoir's “Must We Burn Sade?” alongside the chapter called “Sexual Initiation” in The Second Sex, I argue that the problem with Sade is not his perversity, but his perpetual virginity. In The Second Sex, Beauvoir advances a new understanding of sexual initiation as a physical and spiritual movement toward the other, disqualifying any purely physical machination as sufficient to initiate one into “authentic erotic reality.” Sade's refusal of Eros as described in “Must We Burn Sade?” demonstrates that the Marquis's commitment to his characteristic Sadism in fact condemned him to a barren promiscuity, a trenchant and joyless virginity that he elected to perpetuate. Finally, I argue that we should reread Sadism not as a perversion but as based on the Greek model of the “virgin ailment.” As such, Sadism may turn out to be a more genuine and widespread threat than we ordinarily acknowledge.