Hippocampal volume assessment in temporal lobe epilepsy: How good is automated segmentation?
Article first published online: 13 AUG 2009
Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2009 International League Against Epilepsy
Volume 50, Issue 12, pages 2586–2592, December 2009
How to Cite
Pardoe, H. R., Pell, G. S., Abbott, D. F. and Jackson, G. D. (2009), Hippocampal volume assessment in temporal lobe epilepsy: How good is automated segmentation?. Epilepsia, 50: 2586–2592. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02243.x
- Issue published online: 23 NOV 2009
- Article first published online: 13 AUG 2009
- Accepted May 27, 2009; Early View publication August 13, 2009.
- Hippocampal volumetry;
- Hippocampal sclerosis
Purpose: Quantitative measurement of hippocampal volume using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable tool for detection and lateralization of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis (mTLE). We compare two automated hippocampal volume methodologies and manual hippocampal volumetry to determine which technique is most sensitive for the detection of hippocampal atrophy in mTLE.
Methods: We acquired a three-dimensional (3D) volumetric sequence in 10 patients with left-lateralized mTLE and 10 age-matched controls. Hippocampal volumes were measured manually, and using the software packages Freesurfer and FSL-FIRST. The sensitivities of the techniques were compared by determining the effect size for average volume reduction in patients with mTLE compared to controls. The volumes and spatial overlap of the automated and manual segmentations were also compared.
Results: Significant volume reduction in affected hippocampi in mTLE compared to controls was detected by manual hippocampal volume measurement (p < 0.01, effect size 33.2%), Freesurfer (p < 0.01, effect size 20.8%), and FSL-FIRST (p < 0.01, effect size 13.6%) after correction for brain volume. Freesurfer correlated reasonably (r = 0.74, p << 0.01) with this manual segmentation and FSL-FIRST relatively poorly (r = 0.47, p << 0.01). The spatial overlap between manual and automated segmentation was reduced in affected hippocampi, suggesting the accuracy of automated segmentation is reduced in pathologic brains.
Discussion: Expert manual hippocampal volumetry is more sensitive than both automated methods for the detection of hippocampal atrophy associated with mTLE. In our study Freesurfer was the most sensitive to hippocampal atrophy in mTLE and could be used if expert manual segmentation is not available.