NUTRIENT LIMITATION AND HIGH IRRADIANCE ACCLIMATION REDUCE PAR AND UV-INDUCED VIABILITY LOSS IN THE ANTARCTIC DIATOM CHAETOCEROS BREVIS (BACILLARIOPHYCEAE)

Authors

  • Willem H. Van De Poll,

    1. Department of Marine Biology, Center for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Maria A. Van Leeuwe,

    1. Department of Marine Biology, Center for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Jan Roggeveld,

    1. Department of Marine Biology, Center for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Anita G. J. Buma

    1. Department of Marine Biology, Center for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author

  • 1Received 13 September 2004. Accepted 30 April 2005.

Abstract

The effects of high PAR (400–700 nm), UVA (315–400 nm), and UVB (280–315 nm) radiation on viability and photosynthesis were investigated for Chaetoceros brevis Schütt. This Antarctic marine diatom was cultivated under low, medium, and high irradiance and nitrate, phosphate, silicate, and iron limitation before exposure to a simulated surface irradiance (SSI) treatment, with and without UVB radiation. Light-harvesting and protective pigment composition and PSII parameters were determined before SSI exposure, whereas viability was measured by flow cytometry in combination with a viability stain after the treatment. Recovery of PSII efficiency was measured after 20 h in dim light in a separate experiment. In addition, low and high irradiance acclimated cells were exposed outdoors for 4 h to assess the effects of natural PAR, UVA, and UVB on viability. Low irradiance acclimated cells were particularly sensitive to photo induced viability loss, whereas no viability loss was found after acclimation to high irradiance. Furthermore, nutrient limitation reduced sensitivity to photo induced viability loss, relative to nutrient replete conditions. No additional viability loss was found after UVB exposure. Sunlight exposed cells showed no additional UVB effect on viability, whereas UVA and PAR significantly reduced the viability of low irradiance acclimated cells. Recovery of PSII function was nearly complete in cultures that survived the light treatments. Increased resistance to high irradiance coincided with an increased ratio between protective- and light-harvesting pigments before the SSI treatment, demonstrating the importance of nonphotochemical quenching by diatoxanthin for survival of near-surface irradiance. We conclude that a sudden transfer to high irradiance can be fatal for low irradiance acclimated C. brevis.

Ancillary