SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Figure S1. The cell abundance of Proboscia alata in the six different treatments.

Figure S2. The relationship between the expected AT and the measured AT, both in µmol · kg1.

Figure S3. The relationship between the ΔAT (measured – expected AT) (µmol · kg1) and the [DOC] (µmol · L−1).

Figure S4. The silicate speciation in the 6 different treatments as calculated from the pH, DIC and silicate data.

Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supplementary materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
JPY_1148_sm_FigS1.tif2647KSupporting info item
JPY_1148_sm_FigS2.EPS2592KSupporting info item
JPY_1148_sm_FigS3.EPS2565KSupporting info item
JPY_1148_sm_FigS4.TIF3504KSupporting info item
JPY_1148_sm_SuppLegends.doc28KSupporting info item

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.