This work was supported by a grant from the Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies to SPO.
Enhanced Morphine-Induced Ethanol Drinking in Alcohol-Preferring Alko Alcohol Rats Sensitized to Morphine
Article first published online: 29 MAR 2006
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Volume 30, Issue 4, pages 621–629, April 2006
How to Cite
Ojanen, S. P., Hyytiä, P. and Kiianmaa, K. (2006), Enhanced Morphine-Induced Ethanol Drinking in Alcohol-Preferring Alko Alcohol Rats Sensitized to Morphine. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 30: 621–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00072.x
- Issue published online: 29 MAR 2006
- Article first published online: 29 MAR 2006
- Received for publication July 15, 2005; accepted December 7, 2005.
- Selected Lines;
Background: Alcohol-preferring alko alcohol (AA) rats are more susceptible to morphine-induced behavioral and neurochemical sensitization than alcohol nonpreferring alko nonalcohol (ANA) rats. Alko alcohol rats sensitized to morphine, however, do not show enhanced acquisition of ethanol drinking. The purpose of the present study was to clarify further interactions between morphine-induced behavioral sensitization and voluntary ethanol drinking in the AA rats.
Methods: Alko alcohol rats drinking ethanol in a limited 6-hour access paradigm were sensitized to morphine with repeated injections of morphine (5–15 mg/kg). Injection days alternated with days of ethanol access. Controls had access only to water and/or were given injections of saline. After a 5-day washout period from ethanol and morphine, the rats were challenged with morphine or saline and subsequent ethanol drinking or locomotor activity was recorded.
Results: Ethanol intake was suppressed during the repeated treatment with morphine, and the morphine-treated rats did not differ in ethanol intake from the controls when given access to ethanol after the washout. Intake of ethanol was, however, increased when the rats were challenged with morphine [1 or 10 mg/kg, subcutaneously (s.c.)], while in the controls an increase in ethanol intake was seen only after 1 mg/kg morphine. Sensitization to the locomotor stimulating effects of morphine was revealed in the morphine-treated rats after a challenge with morphine (3 or 10 mg/kg, s.c.). The controls that had been drinking ethanol also showed a sensitized response after morphine (3 mg/kg).
Conclusions: Ethanol did not interfere with the development of sensitization to morphine. Furthermore, the neuroadaptations induced by repeated exposure to ethanol were sufficient to cause behavioral cross-sensitization to morphine. Sensitization to the behavioral effects of morphine alone, however, neither enhances the reinforcing properties of voluntarily consumed ethanol nor contributes to increase in its intake. The increase in ethanol intake found after an acute dose of morphine was augmented in rats withdrawn from repeated treatment with morphine. The data suggest that the neuronal mechanisms underlying behavioral sensitization to morphine probably are distinct from those mediating reinforcement from ethanol and that the morphine-induced neuroadaptations contribute to the enhancement of increase in ethanol intake by morphine.