Prazosin Effects on Stress- and Cue-Induced Craving and Stress Response in Alcohol-Dependent Individuals: Preliminary Findings
Article first published online: 15 SEP 2011
Copyright © 2011 by the Research Society on Alcoholism
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Volume 36, Issue 2, pages 351–360, February 2012
How to Cite
Fox, H. C., Anderson, G. M., Tuit, K., Hansen, J., Kimmerling, A., Siedlarz, K. M., Morgan, P. T. and Sinha, R. (2012), Prazosin Effects on Stress- and Cue-Induced Craving and Stress Response in Alcohol-Dependent Individuals: Preliminary Findings. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36: 351–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01628.x
- Issue published online: 27 JAN 2012
- Article first published online: 15 SEP 2011
- Received for publication February 21, 2011; accepted May 18, 2011.
- Alcohol Dependence;
- Alcohol Craving;
- Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal Axis
Background: Stress, alcohol cues, and dysregulated stress responses increase alcohol craving and relapse susceptibility, but few pharmacologic agents are known to decrease stress- and cue-induced alcohol craving and associated stress dysregulation in humans. Here we report findings from a preliminary efficacy study of the alpha-1 receptor antagonist, prazosin, in modulating these relapse-relevant factors in alcohol-dependent individuals.
Methods: Seventeen early abstinent, treatment-seeking alcohol-dependent individuals (12 men and 5 women) were randomly assigned to receive either placebo or 16 mg daily prazosin in a double-blind, placebo-controlled manner over 4 weeks. During week 4, all patients participated in a 3-day laboratory experiment involving 5-minute guided imagery exposure to stress, alcohol cue, and neutral-relaxing/control conditions, 1 exposure per day, on consecutive days in a random, counterbalanced order. Alcohol craving, anxiety, negative emotion, cardiovascular measures, and plasma hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA; cortisol, adenocorticotropic hormone) were assessed repeatedly in each session.
Results: The prazosin group (n = 9) versus the placebo group (n = 8) showed significantly lower alcohol craving, anxiety, and negative emotion following stress exposure. The placebo group also showed significantly increased stress- and cue-induced alcohol craving, anxiety, negative emotion, and blood pressure (BP), as well as a blunted HPA response relative to the neutral condition, while the prazosin group showed no such increases in craving, anxiety, negative emotion, and BP, and no blunted HPA response to stress and alcohol cue exposure.
Conclusions: Prazosin appears efficacious in decreasing stress- and cue-induced alcohol craving and may normalize the stress dysregulation associated with early recovery from alcoholism. Further research to assess the efficacy of prazosin in reducing alcohol craving and stress-related relapse risk is warranted.