Varenicline Potentiates Alcohol-Induced Negative Subjective Responses and Offsets Impaired Eye Movements
Version of Record online: 16 FEB 2012
Copyright © 2012 by the Research Society on Alcoholism
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Volume 36, Issue 5, pages 906–914, May 2012
How to Cite
Childs, E., Roche, D. J. O., King, A. C. and de Wit, H. (2012), Varenicline Potentiates Alcohol-Induced Negative Subjective Responses and Offsets Impaired Eye Movements. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 36: 906–914. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01675.x
- Issue online: 30 APR 2012
- Version of Record online: 16 FEB 2012
- Received for publication July 11, 2011; accepted September 22, 2011.
- Subjective Effects;
Background: Varenicline (VAR) is a partial nicotinic receptor agonist that is an effective smoking cessation medication. Preliminary evidence indicates that it may also reduce alcohol consumption, but the underlying mechanism is not clear. For example, VAR may reduce alcohol consumption by attenuating its subjectively rewarding properties or by enhancing its aversive effects. In this study, we examined the effects of an acute dose of VAR upon subjective, physiological, and objective responses to low and moderate doses of alcohol in healthy social drinkers.
Methods: Healthy men and women (N = 15) participated in 6 randomized sessions; 3 sessions each with 2 mg VAR and placebo (PL) followed 3 hours later by a beverage containing PL, low-dose alcohol (0.4 g/kg), or high-dose alcohol (0.8 g/kg). Subjective mood and drug effects (i.e., stimulation, drug liking), physiological measures (heart rate, blood pressure), and eye tracking tasks were administered at various intervals before and after drug and alcohol administration.
Results: VAR acutely increased blood pressure, heart rate, ratings of dysphoria and nausea, and also improved eye tracking performance. After alcohol drinking (vs. PL), VAR increased dysphoria and tended to reduce alcohol liking ratings. It also attenuated alcohol-induced eye-tracking impairments. These effects were independent of the drug’s effects on nausea before drinking.
Conclusions: Our data support the theory that VAR may reduce drinking by potentiating aversive effects of alcohol. VAR also offsets alcohol-induced eye movement impairment. The evidence suggests that VAR may decrease alcohol consumption by producing effects, which oppose the rewarding efficacy of alcohol.