SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • ANSI (American National Standards Institute). 2007. ISO TC 229 Nanotechnologies lays roadmaps for international standards. http://www.ansi.org/news_publications/news_story.aspx?menuid=7&articleid=1271. Accessed 27 August 2007.
  • Ashford, N. A. and G. Zwetsloot. 2000. Encouraging inherently safer production in European firms: A report from the field. Journal of Hazardous Materials 78: 123144.
  • BMBF (Federal Ministry for Education and Research). 2006. The high tech strategy for Germany. Berlin : BMBF.
  • Davis, J. M. 2007. How to assess the risks of nanotechnology: Learning from past experience. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 7: 402409.
  • DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). 2006. UK voluntary reporting scheme for engineered nanoscale materials. http://www.defra.gov.uk/ENVIRONMENT/nanotech/policy/. Accessed 30 March 2007.
  • Gasafi, E., L. Meyer, and L. Schebek. 2004. Using life-cycle assessment in process design: Supercritical water gasification of organic feedstocks. Journal of Industrial Ecology 7(3–4): 7591.
  • Hardmann, R. 2006. A toxicological review of quantum dots: Toxicity depends on physiochemical and environmental factors. Environmental Health Perspectives 114(2): 165171.
  • Harrison, K. 1998. Talking with the donkey: Cooperative approaches to environmental protection. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2(3): 5172.
  • Heaton, G. R., Jr. and R. D. Banks. 1997. Toward a new generation of environmental technology: The need for legislative reform. Journal of Industrial Ecology 1(2): 2332.
  • Helland, A. and H. Kastenholz. 2007. Development of nanotechnology in light of sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(8–9): 885888.
  • Helland, A., H. Kastenholz, A. Thidell, P. Arnfalk, and K. Deppert. 2006. Nanoparticulate materials and regulatory policy in Europe: An analysis of stakeholder perspectives. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 8: 709719.
  • Helland, A., P. Wick, A. Koehler, K. Schmid, and C. Som. 2007. Reviewing the environmental and human health knowledge base of carbon nanotubes. Environmental Health Perspectives 115(8): 11251131.
  • Helland, A., M. Scheringer, M. Siegrist, H. Kastenholz, A. Wiek, and R. Scholz. 2008. Risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials—Survey of industrial approaches. Environmental Science & Technology 42(2): 640646.
  • ICON (International Council on Nanotechnology). 2006. ICON report: A survey of current practices in the nanotechnology workplace. http://cohesion.rice.edu/CentersAndInst/ICON/emplibrary/ICONNanotechSurveyFullReduced.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2007.
  • Koehler, A., C. Som, A. Helland, and F. Gottschalk. 2007. Studying the potential release of carbon nanotubes throughout the application life cycle. Journal of Cleaner Production. Forthcoming.
  • Lifset, R. and T. Lindhqvist. 2001. Trust, but verify. Journal of Industrial Ecology 5(2): 911.
  • MacCormack, T. and G. Goss. 2008. Identifying and predicting biological risks associated with manufactured nanoparticles in aquatic ecosystems. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(3) doi: DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00041.x.
  • Nanosafe. 2007. Welcome to Nanosafe2 project. http://www.nanosafe.org. Accessed October 31 2007.
  • Oberdörster, G., E. Oberdörster, and J. Oberdörster. 2005. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environmental Health Perspectives 113(7): 823839.
  • Reijnders, L. 2006. Cleaner nanotechnology and hazard reduction of manufactured nanoparticles. Journal of Cleaner Production 14: 124133.
  • Siegrist, M., C. Keller, H. Kastenholz, S. Frey, and A. Wiek. 2007. Lay people's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards. Risk Analysis 27(1): 5969.
  • Siegrist, M., A. Wiek, A. Helland, and H. Kastenholz. 2007. Risks and nanotechnology: The public is more concerned than experts and industry. Nature Nanotechnology 2(February): 67.
  • Smiley, Smith S., H. D. Hosgood, E. S. Michelson, M. H. Stowe. 2008. Americans' nanotechnology risk perception: Assessing opinion change. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(3) doi: DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00032.x.
  • U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2007. Nanotechnology white paper. Washington , DC : U.S. EPA.
  • Van Berkel, R., E. Willems, and M. Lafleur. 1997. The relationship between cleaner production and industrial ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology 1(1): 5166.
  • Wiek, A., S. Zemp, M. Siegrist, and A. Walter. 2007. Sustainable governance of emerging technologies—Critical constellations in the agent network of nanotechnology. Technology in Society 29: 388406.