The strength of the carbon performance indicators lies in measuring the continuous progress over time on the micro level.
1530-9290/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=6a3a02534566058379543c3b2bea5b2e04f485ef)
1530-9290/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=68ef93146a08b203799ccd28b8c5e1c52419d0c1)
You have free access to this content
Corporate Carbon Performance Indicators Revisited
Article first published online: 14 APR 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00239.x
© 2010 by Yale University
Additional Information
How to Cite
Busch, T. (2010), Corporate Carbon Performance Indicators Revisited. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14: 374–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00239.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 16 JUN 2010
- Article first published online: 14 APR 2010
References
- California Climate Action Registry. 2009. General reporting protocol: Reporting entity-wide greenhouse gas emissions. Los Angeles , CA : California Climate Action Registry.
- and . 2008. Corporate carbon performance indicators: Carbon intensity, dependency, exposure, and risk. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(4): 505–520.
- , , and . 2008. Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review 17(4): 719–745.
- Network for Business Sustainability. 2009. Knowledge priorities for business sustainability 2010. London , Canada : University of Western Ontario.
- , , and . 2009. Companies on the scale: Comparing and benchmarking the sustainability performance of businesses. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13(3): 361–383.