SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Althaus H. J., P. de Haan, and R. W. Scholz. 2009a. Traffic noise in LCA. Part 1: State-of-science and requirement profile for consistent, context-sensitive integration of traffic noise in LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14(6): 560570.
  • Althaus H. J., P. de Haan, and R. W. Scholz. 2009b. Traffic noise in LCA. Part 2: Analysis of existing methods and proposition of a new framework for consistent, context-sensitive LCI modelling of road transport noise emission. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14(7): 676686.
  • Bare, J. C. 2010. Life cycle impact assessment research developments and needs. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 12(4): 341351.
  • Basson, L. and J. G. Petrie. 2007. An integrated approach for the consideration of uncertainty in decision making supported by life cycle assessment. Environmental Modelling & Software 22(2): 167176.
  • Benetto, E., C. Dujet, and P. Rousseaux. 2006. Possibility theory: A new approach to uncertainty analysis? International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11(2): 114116.
  • Benoît, C., G. A. Norris, D. Ausilio, S. Rogers, J. Reed, and S. Overaker. 2010. Social hotspot database risk and opportunity table development . York Beach , ME , USA : New Earth.
  • Bojacá, C. R. and E. Schrevens. 2010. Parameter uncertainty in LCA: Stochastic sampling under correlation. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(3): 238246.
  • Börjeson, L., M. Höjer, K. H. Dreborg, T. Ekvall, and G. Finnveden. 2006. Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide. Futures 38(7): 723739.
  • Buttol, P., R. Buonamici, L. Naldesi, C. Rinaldi, A. Zamagni, and P. Masoni. 2011. Integrating services and tools in an ICT platform to support eco-innovation in SMEs. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy . doi: 10.1007/s10098-011-0388-7.
  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 2003. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Integrated Product Policy. Building on Environmental Life-Cycle Thinking . COM(2003)302 final. Brussels, Belgium : CEC.
  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 2004. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Stimulating Technologies for Sustainable Development: An Environmental Technologies Action Plan for the European Union . COM(2004) 38 final. Brussels, Belgium : CEC.
  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 2008. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan . COM(2008) 397/3. Brussels, Belgium : CEC.
  • Cicas, G., C. T. Hendrickson, A. Horvath, and H. S. Matthews. 2007. A regional version of a US economic input-output life cycle assessment model. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(6): 365372.
  • Ciroth, A. and J. Franze. 2011. LCA of an ecolabeled notebook. Consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle . Raleigh , NC , USA : lulu.com.
  • Colodel, C. M., M. Fischer, S. Morel, J. Stichling, and A. Forell. 2009. Regional inventories and opportunities in the car industry—The Renault KOLEOS case study. Paper presented at the 3rd International Seminar on Society and Materials, SAM3, 29–30 April, Freiberg, Germany.
  • Dreyer, L. C., M. Z. Hauschild, and J. Schierbeck. 2010. Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part I: Development of indicators for labour rights. International Journal of Life cycle Assessment 15(3): 247259.
  • Earles, J. M. and A. Halog. 2011. Consequential life cycle assessment: A review. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16(5): 445453
  • EC (European Community). 2006. Directive 2006/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on waste. Official Journal of the European Union L114.27.4.2006: 921.
  • EC (European Community). 2009. Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products. Official Journal of the European Union L285.31.10.2009: 1035.
  • Ekvall, T. and A. Andrae. 2006. Attributional and consequential environmental assessment of the shift to lead-free solders. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11(5): 344353.
  • Fava, J., S. Baer, and J. Cooper. 2009. Increasing demands for life cycle assessment in North America. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13(4): 491494.
  • Finnveden, G., M. Z. Hauschild, T. Ekvall, J. B. Guinée, R. Heijungs, S. Hellweg, A. Koehler, D. Pennington, and S. Suh. 2009. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 91(1): 121.
  • Finnveden, G. and M. Nilsson. 2005. Site-dependent life-cycle impact assessment in Sweden. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(4): 235239.
  • Franze, J. and A. Ciroth. 2011. A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16(4): 366379.
  • Gallego, A., L. Rodríguez, A. Hospido, M. T. Moreira, and G. Feijoo. 2010. Development of regional characterization factors for aquatic eutrophication. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(1): 3243.
  • Gandhi, N., M. Diamond, D. can de Meent, M. A. J. Huijbregts, W. J. G. M. Peijnenburg, and J. B. Guinée. 2010. New method for calculating comparative toxicity potential of cationic metals in freshwater: Application to copper, nickel and zinc. Environmental Science & Technology 44(13): 51955201.
  • Geisler, G., T. B. Hofstetter, and K. Hungerbühler. 2004. Production of fine and speciality chemicals: Procedure for the estimation of LCIs. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(2): 101113.
  • Glass, G. V. 1976. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher 5: 38.
  • Goedkoop, M., R. Heijungs, M. A. J. Huijbregts, A. M. De Schryver, J. Struijs, and R. van Zelm. 2009. ReCiPe 2008 – A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level . First edition. Report I: Characterisation. http://www.lcia-recipe.net/. Accessed January 2011.
  • Graedel, T. E., E. van der Voet (eds.). 2010. Linkages of sustainability . Cambridge , MA , USA : MIT Press.
  • Guinée, J. B., R. Heijungs, G. Huppes, A. Zamagni, P. Masoni, R. Buonamici, T. Ekvall, and T. Rydberg. 2011. Life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future. Environmental Science and Technology 45(1): 9096.
  • Guinée, J. B., G. Huppes, R. Heijungs, and E. van der Voet. 2009. Research strategy, programmes and exemplary projects on life cycle sustainability analysis (LCSA) . Technical Report of the CALCAS project. http://www.calcasproject.net. Accessed December 2010.
  • Heijungs, R., G. Huppes, and G. B. Guinée. 2010. Life cycle assessment and sustainability analysis of products, materials and technologies. Towards a scientific framework for sustainability life cycle analysis. Polymer Degradation and Stability 95(3): 422428.
  • Hellweg, S., E. Demou, R. Bruzzi, A. Meijer, R. K. Rosenbaum, M. A. J. Huijbregts, and T. M. C. McKone. 2009. Integrating human indoor air pollutant exposure within life cycle impact assessment. Environmental Science & Technology 43(6): 16701679.
  • Hischier, R., S. Hellweg, C. Capello, and A. Primas. 2005. Establishing life cycle inventories of chemicals based on differing data availability. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(1): 5967.
  • Höjer, M., S. Ahlroth, K. H. Dreborg, T. Ekvall, G. Finnveden, O. Hjelm, E. Hochschorner, M. Nilsson, and V. Palm. 2008. Scenarios in selected tools for environmental system analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(18): 19581970.
  • Huijbregts, M. A. J. 1998. Part II: Dealing with parameter uncertainty and uncertainty due to choices in life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 3(6): 343351.
  • Huijbregts, M. A. J., W. Gilijamse, A. M. J. Ragas, and L. Reijnders. 2003. Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life cycle assessment: A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling. Environmental Science and Technology 37(11): 26002608.
  • Hunkeler, D., D. Lichtenvort, and G. Rebitzer (eds.). 2008. Environmental life cycle costing . Pensacola , FL , USA : CRC, SETAC USA.
  • Huppes, G. and M. Ishikawa. 2009. Eco-efficiency guiding micro-level actions towards sustainability: Ten basic steps for analysis. Ecological Economics 68(6): 16871700.
  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006a. ISO 14040. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework . Geneva , Switzerland : ISO.
  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006b. ISO 14044. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines . Geneva , Switzerland : ISO.
  • Itsubo, N. and I. Atsushi. 2007. LIME2 – Development of the updated Japanese damage oriented LCIA methodology. Paper presented at SETAC Europe 17th annual meeting, 20–24 May, Porto, Portugal.
  • Jolliet, O., R. Müller-Wenk, J. Bare, A. Brent, M. Goedkoop, R. Heijungs, N. Itsubo, C. Peña, D. Pennington, J. Potting, G. Rebitzer, M. Stewart, H. Udo de Haes, and B.P. Weidema. 2004. The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9(6): 394404.
  • Jørgensen, A., M. Z. Hauschild, M. S. Jørgensen, and A. Wangel. 2009. Relevance and feasibility of social life cycle assessment from a company perspective. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14(3): 204214.
  • Jørgensen, A., C. H. Lai Lufanna, and M. Z. Hauschild. 2010. Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(1): 516.
  • Jørgensen A., A. Le Bocq, L. Nazarkina, and M. Hauschild. 2008. Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(2): 96103.
  • Joshi, S. 1999. Product environmental life-cycle assessment using input-output techniques. Journal of Industrial Ecology 3(2–3): 95120.
  • JRC-IES (Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability). 2010. ILCD handbook: General guide for life cycle assessment – Provisions and action steps . Ispra , Italy : European Commission, JRC-IES. http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pdf-directory/ILCD-Handbook-General-guide-for-LCA-PROVISIONS-online-12March2010.pdf. Accessed December 2010.
  • Kim, I. and T. Hur. 2009. Integration of working environment into life cycle assessment framework. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14(4): 290301.
  • Kloepffer, W. 2008. Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(2): 8995.
  • Lloyd, S. M. and R. Ries. 2007. Characterizing, propagating and analysing uncertainty in life-cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11(1): 161179.
  • Lund, H., B. V. Mathiesen, P. Christensen, and J. H. Schmidt. 2010. Energy system analysis of marginal electricity supply in consequential LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(3): 260271.
  • Mathiesen, B. V., M. Münster, and T. Fruegaard. 2009. Uncertainties related to the identification of the marginal energy technology in consequential life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 17: 13311338.
  • Mattila, T. J., S. Pakarinen, and L. Sokka. 2010. Quantifying the total environmental impacts of an industrial symbiosis – A comparison of process-, hybrid and input-output life cycle assessment. Environmental Science & Technology 44(11): 43094314.
  • Milà i Canals, L., C. Bauer, J. Depestele, A. Dubreuil, R. Freiermuth Knuchel, G. Gaillard, O. Michelsen, R. Müller-Wenk, and B. Rydgren. 2007a. Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(1): 515.
  • Milà i Canals, L., R. Müller-Wenk, C. Bauer, J. Depestele, A. Dubreuil, R. Freiermuth Knuchel, G. Gaillard, O. Michelsen, and B. Rydgren. 2007b. Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment in LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(1): 24.
  • Moreno, A., F. Cappellaro, P. Masoni, and A. Amato. 2011. Application of product data technology standards to LCA data. Journal of Industrial Ecology 15(4):483495.
  • Mueller, K., M. Lampérth, and F. Kimura. 2004. Parameterised inventories for life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9: 227235.
  • Nielsen, A. M. and B. P. Weidema. 2001. Input/output analysis – Shortcuts to life cycle data . Environmental Project No. 581. Copenhagen, Denmark : Danish Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Núñez, M., B. Civit, P. Muñoz, A. P. Arena, J. Rieradevall, and A. Antón. 2010. Assessing potential desertification environmental impact in life cycle assessment. Part 1: Methodological aspects. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(1): 6778.
  • Pfister, S., A. Koehler, and S. Hellweg. 2009. Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environmental Science & Technology 43(11): 40984104.
  • Reap, J., F. Roman, S. Duncan, and B. Bras. 2008a. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 1: Goal and scope and inventory analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(10): 290300.
  • Reap, J., F. Roman, S. Duncan, and B. Bras. 2008b. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Part 2: Impact assessment and interpretation. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(5): 374388.
  • Rebitzer, G. and T. Ekvall (eds.). 2004. Scenarios in life cycle assessment (LCAS) . Pensacola , FL , USA : SETAC.
  • Reitinger, C., M. Dumke, M. Barosevcic, and R. Hillerbrand. 2011. A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16(4): 380388.
  • Rosenbaum, R. K., T. M. Bachmann, R. S. Gold, M. A. J. Huijbregts, O. Jolliet, R. Juraske, A. Köhler, H.F. Larsen, M. MacLeod, M. Margni, T.E. McKone, J. Payet, M. Schuhmacher, D. Van de Meent, and M.Z. Hauschild. 2008. USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: Recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(7): 532546.
  • Rowley, H. V., S. Lundie, and G. M. Peters. 2009. A hybrid life cycle assessment model for comparison with conventional methodologies in Australia. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14(6): 508516.
  • Rudner, L., G. V. Glass, D. L. Evartt, and P. J. Emery. 2002. A user's guide to the meta-analysis of research studies . Education Resources Information Center Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
  • Rydberg, T., A. Öman, I. Jöborn, E. Eriksson, M. Pitts, S. Valdivia, R. Buonamici, et al . 2008. Sustainability decisions: practical survey . Technical Report of the CALCAS project. http://www.calcasproject.net. Accessed December 2010.
  • Rydberg, T., M. Pitts, U. Pretato, F. Rubik, K. Suomalainen, and S. Valdivia. 2009. Demand for science in sustainability decision support – Identification of user needs . Technical Report of the CALCAS project. http://www.calcasproject.net. Accessed December 2010.
  • Rydh, C. J. and M. Sun. 2005. Life cycle inventory data for materials grouped according to environmental and material properties. Journal of Cleaner Production 13(13–14): 12581268.
  • Schmidt, J. H. 2008. System delimitation in agricultural consequential LCA – Outline of methodology and illustrative case study of wheat in Denmark. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(4): 350364.
  • Seppälä, J., M. Posch, M. Johansson, and J. P. Hettelingh. 2006. Country-dependent characterisation factors for acidification and terrestrial eutrophication based on accumulated exceedance as an impact category indicator. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11(6): 403416.
  • SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry) Europe LCA Steering Committee. 2008. Standardisation efforts to measure greenhouse gases and ‘carbon footprinting’ for products. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(2): 8788.
  • Settanni, E. 2008. The need for a computational structure of LCC. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13(7): 526531.
  • Shah, V. P. and R. J. Ries. 2009. A characterization model with spatial and temporal resolution for life cycle impact assessment of photochemical precursors in the United States. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14(4): 313327.
  • Sonnemann, G. and B. Vigon (eds.). 2011. Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases . Pensacola , FL , USA : SETAC Life Cycle Initiative.
  • Sonnemann, G., B. Vigon, C. Broadbent, M. A. Curran, M. Finkbeiner, R. Frischknecht, A. Inaba, A. Schanssema, M. Stevenson, C. M. L. Ugaya, H. Wang, M. A. Wolf, and S. Valdivia. 2011. Process on “global guidance for LCA databases”. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16(1):9597.
  • Suh, S. and G. Huppes. 2005. Methods for life cycle inventory of a product. Journal of Cleaner Production 13(7): 687697.
  • Suh, S. and S. Nakamura. 2007. Five years in the area of input-output and hybrid LCA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(6): 351352.
  • Swarr, T. 2009. Societal life cycle assessment – Could you repeat the question? International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 14(4): 285289.
  • Swarr, T. E., D. Hunkeler, W. Klöpffer, H. L. Pesonen, A. Ciroth, A. C. Brent, and R. Pagan. 2011. Environmental life cycle costing: a code of practice . Pensacola , FL , USA : SETAC.
  • Tukker, A., E. Poliakov, R. Heijungs, T. Hawkins, F. Neuwahl, J. M. Rueda-Cantuche, S. Giljum, et al . 2009. Towards a global multi-regional environmentally extended input-output database. Ecological Economics 68(7):19281937.
  • Venkatesh, G., J. Hammervold and H. Brattebø. 2009. Combined MFA-LCA for analysis of wastewater pipeline networks. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13(4): 532550.
  • Weidema, B. P., T. Ekvall, and R. Heijungs. 2009. Guidelines for application of deepened and broadened LCA . Deliverable of the CALCAS project. http://www.calcasproject.net. Accessed January 2011.
  • Wegener Sleeswijk, A. 2011. Regional LCA in a global perspective. A basis for spatially differentiated environmental life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16(2):106112.
  • Wegener Sleeswijk, A. and R. Heijungs. 2010. GLOBOX: A spatially differentiated global fate, intake and effect model for toxicity assessment in LCA. Science of the Total Environment 408(14): 28172832.
  • Wernet, G., S. Papadokonstantakis, S. Hellweg, and K. Hungerbühler. 2009. Advanced neural network models for the prediction of chemical production properties. Paper presented at of SETAC Europe 19th annual meeting, 31 May–4 June, Goteborg, Sweden .
  • Yi, I., N. Itsubo, A. Inaba, and K. Matsumoto. 2007. Development of the interregional I/O based LCA method considering region-specifics of indirect effects in regional evaluation. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(6): 353364.
  • Zamagni, A., O. Amerighi, and P. Buttol. Strengths or bias in social LCA? International Journal of Life cycle Assessment 16(7):596598.
  • Zamagni, A., R. Buonamici, P. Buttol, P. L. Porta, and P. Masoni. 2009a. Main R&D lines to improve reliability, significance and usability of standardised LCA . Technical Report of the CALCAS project. http://www.calcasproject.net. Accessed December 2010.
  • Zamagni, A., P. Buttol, R. Buonamici, P. Masoni, J.B. Guinée, G. Huppes, R. Heijungs, E. van der Voet, T. Ekvall, and T. Rydberg. 2009b. Blue paper on life cycle sustainability analysis. 2009 . Deliverable 20 of Work Package 7 of the CALCAS project. http://www.calcasproject.net. Accessed December 2010.
  • Zamagni, A., P. Buttol, P. L. Porta, R. Buonamici, P. Masoni, J. B. Guinée, R. Heijungs, T. Ekvall, R. Bersani, A. Bieńkowska, and U. Pretato. 2008. Critical review of the current research needs and limitations related to ISO-LCA practice . Technical Report of the CALCAS project. http://www.calcasproject.net. Accessed December 2010.
  • Zhang, Y., A. Baral, and B. R. Bakshi. 2010. Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, part II: Toward an ecologically based LCA. Environmental Science & Technology 44(7): 26242631.
  • Zurek, M. B. and T. Henrichs. 2007. Linking scenarios across geographical scales in international environmental assessments. Technological Forecast and Societal Change 74(8): 12821295.