SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Sandra Belboom, Angélique Léonard, Does biobased polymer achieve better environmental impacts than fossil polymer? Comparison of fossil HDPE and biobased HDPE produced from sugar beet and wheat, Biomass and Bioenergy, 2016, 85, 159

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Jerzy Korol, Dorota Burchart-Korol, Magdalena Pichlak, Expansion of environmental impact assessment for eco-efficiency evaluation of biocomposites for industrial application, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 113, 144

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Shawn E. Hunter, Richard K. Helling, A Call for Technology Developers To Apply Life Cycle and Market Perspectives When Assessing the Potential Environmental Impacts of Chemical Technology Projects, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54, 16, 4003

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Akshay D. Patel, Selvedin Telalović, Johannes H. Bitter, Ernst Worrell, Martin K. Patel, Analysis of sustainability metrics and application to the catalytic production of higher alcohols from ethanol, Catalysis Today, 2015, 239, 56

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Jim Philp, Balancing the bioeconomy: supporting biofuels and bio-based materials in public policy, Energy Environ. Sci., 2015, 8, 11, 3063

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Nusheng Chen, Zhaohui Tong, Weihua Yang, Anthony B. Brennan, Biocomposites with tunable properties from poly(lactic acid)-based copolymers and carboxymethyl cellulose via ionic assembly, Carbohydrate Polymers, 2015, 128, 122

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Luciano M. Verdade, Carlos I. Piña, Luís Miguel Rosalino, Biofuels and biodiversity: Challenges and opportunities, Environmental Development, 2015, 15, 64

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Diana Meeks, Troy Hottle, M.M. Bilec, A.E. Landis, Compostable biopolymer use in the real world: Stakeholder interviews to better understand the motivations and realities of use and disposal in the US, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2015, 105, 134

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Franziska Hesser, Environmental advantage by choice: Ex-ante LCA for a new Kraft pulp fibre reinforced polypropylene composite in comparison to reference materials, Composites Part B: Engineering, 2015, 79, 197

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Ingunn Saur Modahl, Andreas Brekke, Clara Valente, Environmental assessment of chemical products from a Norwegian biorefinery, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 94, 247

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Adriana Petrella Hansen, Gil Anderi da Silva, Luiz Kulay, Evaluation of the environmental performance of alternatives for polystyrene production in Brazil, Science of The Total Environment, 2015, 532, 655

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    José Potting, Eugenie van der Harst, Facility arrangements and the environmental performance of disposable and reusable cups, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20, 8, 1143

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Yasunori Kikuchi, Yuichiro Kanematsu, Masamichi Ugo, Yosuke Hamada, Tatsuya Okubo, Industrial Symbiosis Centered on a Regional Cogeneration Power Plant Utilizing Available Local Resources: A Case Study of Tanegashima, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2015, 19, 6
  14. 14
    I. Tsiropoulos, A.P.C. Faaij, L. Lundquist, U. Schenker, J.F. Briois, M.K. Patel, Life cycle impact assessment of bio-based plastics from sugarcane ethanol, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 90, 114

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Tina Dettmer, Suphunnika Ibbotson, Gerlind Öhlschläger, Christoph Herrmann, Sami Kara, Technical applications of Jatropha oil—environmental effectiveness of renewable resources, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20, 10, 1376

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Valentina Fantin, Simona Scalbi, Giuseppe Ottaviano, Paolo Masoni, A method for improving reliability and relevance of LCA reviews: The case of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of tap and bottled water, Science of The Total Environment, 2014, 476-477, 228

    CrossRef

  17. You have free access to this content17
    Marc A. Dubé, Somaieh Salehpour, Applying the Principles of Green Chemistry to Polymer Production Technology, Macromolecular Reaction Engineering, 2014, 8, 1
  18. 18
    D. Saygin, D.J. Gielen, M. Draeck, E. Worrell, M.K. Patel, Assessment of the technical and economic potentials of biomass use for the production of steam, chemicals and polymers, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 40, 1153

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Angela Daniela La Rosa, Giuseppe Recca, John Summerscales, Alberta Latteri, Gulia Cozzo, Gianluca Cicala, Bio-based versus traditional polymer composites. A life cycle assessment perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 74, 135

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Susanne V. Jørgensen, Francesco Cherubini, Ottar Michelsen, Biogenic CO2 fluxes, changes in surface albedo and biodiversity impacts from establishment of a miscanthus plantation, Journal of Environmental Management, 2014, 146, 346

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Stefan Bringezu, Carbon Recycling for Renewable Materials and Energy Supply, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2014, 18, 3
  22. 22
    S.J. Gerssen-Gondelach, D. Saygin, B. Wicke, M.K. Patel, A.P.C. Faaij, Competing uses of biomass: Assessment and comparison of the performance of bio-based heat, power, fuels and materials, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 40, 964

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Michèle Besson, Pierre Gallezot, Catherine Pinel, Conversion of Biomass into Chemicals over Metal Catalysts, Chemical Reviews, 2014, 114, 3, 1827

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Stefanie Kind, Steffi Neubauer, Judith Becker, Motonori Yamamoto, Martin Völkert, Gregory von Abendroth, Oskar Zelder, Christoph Wittmann, From zero to hero – Production of bio-based nylon from renewable resources using engineered Corynebacterium glutamicum, Metabolic Engineering, 2014, 25, 113

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Wil V. Srubar, Sabbie A. Miller, Michael D. Lepech, Sarah L. Billington, Incorporating spatiotemporal effects and moisture diffusivity into a multi-criteria materials selection methodology for wood–polymer composites, Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 71, 589

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Eugenie van der Harst, José Potting, Carolien Kroeze, Multiple data sets and modelling choices in a comparative LCA of disposable beverage cups, Science of The Total Environment, 2014, 494-495, 129

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Jim Philp, OECD Policies for Bioplastics in the Context of a Bioeconomy, 2013, Industrial Biotechnology, 2014, 10, 1, 19

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    Eugenie van der Harst, José Potting, Variation in LCA results for disposable polystyrene beverage cups due to multiple data sets and modelling choices, Environmental Modelling & Software, 2014, 51, 123

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    E. Jochem, F. Reitze, Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, 2014,

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Paraskevi Karka, Stavros Papadokonstantakis, Konrad Hungerbühler, Antonis Kokossis, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design, 2014,

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Eugenie van der Harst, José Potting, A critical comparison of ten disposable cup LCAs, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2013, 43, 86

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    J.C. Philp, R.J. Ritchie, K. Guy, Biobased plastics in a bioeconomy, Trends in Biotechnology, 2013, 31, 2, 65

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Eddie F. Gómez, Frederick C. Michel, Biodegradability of conventional and bio-based plastics and natural fiber composites during composting, anaerobic digestion and long-term soil incubation, Polymer Degradation and Stability, 2013, 98, 12, 2583

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    V. Piemonte, S. Sabatini, F. Gironi, Chemical Recycling of PLA: A Great Opportunity Towards the Sustainable Development?, Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 2013, 21, 3, 640

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    P. Pawelzik, M. Carus, J. Hotchkiss, R. Narayan, S. Selke, M. Wellisch, M. Weiss, B. Wicke, M.K. Patel, Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials – Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2013, 73, 211

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    Akshay D. Patel, Koen Meesters, Herman den Uil, Ed de Jong, Ernst Worrell, Martin K. Patel, Early-Stage Comparative Sustainability Assessment of New Bio-based Processes, ChemSusChem, 2013, 6, 9
  37. 37
    Kenthorai Raman Jegannathan, Per Henning Nielsen, Environmental assessment of enzyme use in industrial production – a literature review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 42, 228

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    A.D. La Rosa, G. Cozzo, A. Latteri, A. Recca, A. Björklund, E. Parrinello, G. Cicala, Life cycle assessment of a novel hybrid glass-hemp/thermoset composite, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 44, 69

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Rodrigo AF Alvarenga, Jo Dewulf, Steven De Meester, Alain Wathelet, Joseph Villers, Richard Thommeret, Zdenek Hruska, Life cycle assessment of bioethanol-based PVC, Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2013, 7, 4
  40. 40
    Martin K. Patel, Aloysius J.J.E. Eerhart, Deger Saygin, Environmental Assessment of Novel Catalytic Processes Based on Renewable Raw Materials – Case Study for Furanics,