SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Anex, R. P. and W. Focht. 2008. Public participation in life cycle assessment and risk assessment: A shared need. Risk Analysis 22(5): 861877.
  • Arvizu, D., T. Bruckner, H. Chum, O. Edenhofer, S. Estefen, A. Faaij, M. Fischedick, G. Hansen, G. Hiriart, O. Hohmeyer, K. G. T. Hollands, J. Huckerby, S. Kadner, Å. Killingtveit, A. Kumar, A. Lewis, O. Lucon, P. Matschoss, L. Maurice, M. Mirza, C. Mitchell, W. Moomaw, J. Moreira, L. J. Nilsson, J. Nyboer, R. Pichs-Madruga, J. Sathaye, J. Sawin, R. Schaeffer, T. Schei, S. Schlömer, K. Seyboth, R. Sims, G. Sinden, Y. Sokona, C. von Stechow, J. Steckel, A. Verbruggen, R. Wiser, F. Yamba, and T. Zwickel. 2011. Technical summary. In IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation , edited by O. Edenhofen, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, and C. von Stechow. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Baldassarre, M. T., N. Boffoli, D. Caivano, and G. Visaggio. 2008. A hands-on approach for teaching systematic review. Computer Science 5089: 415426.
  • Bastian, H., P. Glasziou, and I. Chalmers. 2010. Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: How will we ever keep up? PLoS Medicine 7(9): e1000326.
  • Bhat, V. and R. Prakash. 2008. LCA of renewable energy for electricity generation systems—A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13(5): 10671073.
  • Booth, A. and A. Fry-Smith. 2003. Developing the research question. In Etext on health technology assessment (HTA) information resources , edited by L. Topfer and I. Auston. Bethesda , MD , USA : National Information Center on Health Services and Health Care Technology. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/ehta. Accessed November 2011.
  • Booth, A., M. Clarke, D. Ghersi, D. Moher, M. Petticrew, and L. Stewart. 2011. An international registry of systematic-review protocols. Lancet 377(9760): 108109.
  • Carnegie Mellon University, Green Design Institute. 2008. Economic input-output life cycle assessment (EIOLCA), US 1997 industry benchmark model . Pittsburgh , PA , USA : Green Design Institute. http://www.iolca.net. Accessed November 2011.
  • Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2009. Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care . York , UK : Centre for Reviews and Dissemination.
  • Cherubini, F., N. Bird, G. Jungmeier, B. Schlamadinger, and S. Woess-Gallasch. 2009. Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 53(8): 434447.
  • Chung, J.W. and D.O. Meltzer. 2009. Estimate of the carbon footprint of the US health care sector. JAMA 302(18): 19701972.
  • Counsell, C. 1997. Formulating questions and locating primary studies for inclusion in systematic reviews. Annals of Internal Medicine 127: 380387.
  • De Vries, M. and I. de Boer. 2010. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments. Livestock Science 128(1–3): 111.
  • Dickersin, K., K. Higgins, and C. L. Meinert. 1990. Identification of meta-analyses. The need for standard terminology. Controlled Clinical Trials 11(1): 5266.
  • Earles, J. M. and A. Halog. 2011. Consequential life cycle assessment: A review. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16: 445453.
  • Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. Public Law 110-140. Washington , DC , USA : U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Farrell, A. E., R. J. Plevin, B. T. Turner, A. D. Jones, M. O’Hare, and D. M. Kammen. 2006. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311(5760): 506508.
  • Finnveden, G., M. Hauschild, T. Ekvall, J. Guinee, R. Heijungs, S. Hellweg, A. Koehler, D. Pennington, and S. Suh. 2009. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 91(1): 121.
  • Fraser, A. G. and F. D. Dunstan. 2010. On the impossibility of being expert. BMJ 341: c6815.
  • Gates, S. 2002. Review of methodology of quantitative reviews using meta-analysis in ecology. Journal of Animal Ecology 71: 547557.
  • Ghapanchi, A. H. and A. Aurum. 2011. Antecedents to IT personnel's intentions to leave: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software 84(2): 238249.
  • Hedges, L. V. 1986. Issues in meta-analysis. In Review of research in education . Washington , DC , USA : American Educational Research Association.
  • Higgins, J. and S. Green, eds. 2011. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions , version 5.1.0.2011. Cochrane Collaboration. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed November 2011.
  • Holloway, R., K. Nesbit, D. Bordley, and K. Noyes. 2004. Teaching and evaluating first and second year medical students’ practice of evidence-based medicine. Medical Education 38(8): 868878.
  • Hunkeler, D. and G. Rebitzer. 2005. The future of life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10(5): 305308.
  • Ioannidis, J. 2008. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14(5): 951957.
  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006a. ISO 14040. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework . Geneva , Switzerland : ISO.
  • ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2006b. ISO 14044. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines . Geneva , Switzerland : ISO.
  • Johnson, R. T. and K. Dickersin. 2007. Publication bias against negative results from clinical trials: Three of the seven deadly sins. Nature Clinical Practice Neurology 3(11): 590591.
  • Kettenring, K. M. and C. R. Adams. 2011. Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecology 48(4): 970979.
  • Khaddaj-Mallat, C., J.-M. Rousset, and P. Ferrant. 2011. The transient and progressive flooding stages of damaged ro-ro vessels: A systematic review of entailed factors. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering 133(3); 031105.
  • Kubiszewski, I., C. J. Cleveland, and P. K. Endres. 2010. Meta-analysis of net energy return for wind power systems. Renewable Energy 35(1): 218225.
  • Larson, E. 2006. A review of life-cycle analysis studies on liquid biofuel systems for the transport sector. Energy for Sustainable Development 10(2): 109126.
  • Lebrun, J.-L. 2007. Abstract: The heart of your paper. In Scientific writing: A reader and writer's guide . Singapore : World Scientific Publishing.
  • Lemming, G., M. Hauschild, and P. Bjerg. 2010. Life cycle assessment of soil and groundwater remediation technologies: Literature review. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15: 115127.
  • Lenzen, M. and J. Munksgaard. 2002. Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—Review and applications. Renewable Energy 26(3): 339362.
  • Liberati, A., D. G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. C. Gotzsche, J. P. Ioannidis, M. Clarke, P. J. Devereaux, J. Kleijnen, and D. Moher. 2009. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339: b2700.
  • Mattila, T., S. Pakarinen, and L. Sokka. 2010. Quantifying the total environmental impacts of an industrial symbiosis—A comparison of process-, hybrid and input-output life cycle assessment. Environmental Science & Technology 44(11): 43094314.
  • Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 11th ed. Online version. http://www.merriam-webster.com. Accessed January 2012.
  • Miller, J. 2000. Applying meta-analytical procedures to software engineering experiments. Journal of Systems and Software 54(1): 2939.
  • Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 339: b2535.
  • Mondelaers, K., J. Aertsens, and G. Van Huylenbroeck. 2009. A meta-analysis of the differences in environmental impacts between organic and conventional farming. British Food Journal 111(10): 10981119.
  • Montori, V. M., N. L. Wilczynski, D. Morgan, and R. B. Haynes. 2005. Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: Analytical survey. BMJ 330(7482): 6873.
  • Moomaw, W., P. Burgherr, G. Heath, M. Lenzen, J. Nyboer, and A. Verbruggen, 2011. Annex II: Methodology. In IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation , edited by O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, and C. von Stechow. Cambridge , UK : Cambridge University Press.
  • Neely, G. J., A. Magit, J. Rich, C. Voelker, E. Wang, R. Paniello, B. Nussenbaum, and J. Bradley. 2009. A practical guide to understanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Otolarygology—Head and Neck Surgery 142(1): 614.
  • Ortiz, O., F. Castells, and G. Sonnemann. 2009. Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA. Construction and Building Materials 23(1): 2839.
  • Pawson, R., T. Greenhalgh, G. Harvey, and K. Walshe. 2005. Realist review—A new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 10(Suppl 1): 2134.
  • Pino, F. J., F. Garcia, and M. Piattini. 2008. Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises: A systematic review. Software Quality Journal 16: 237261.
  • Pullin, A. S. and G. B. Stewart. 2006. Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conservation Biology 20(6): 16471656.
  • Reap, J., F. Roman, S. Duncan, and B. Bras. 2008. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13: 374388.
  • Rowe, R., J. Whitaker, J. Chapman, D. Howard, and G. Taylor. 2008. Life cycle assessment in the bioenergy sector: Developing a systematic review . London , UK : UK Energy Research Centre. http://www.nora.nerc.ac.uk/5099/. Accessed November 2011.
  • Sackett, D. L., W. M. Rosenbery, M. J. Gray, R. B. Haynes, and W. S. Richardson. 1996. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312: 7172.
  • Salleh, N., E. Mendes, and J. Grundy. 2011. Empirical studies of pair programming for CS/SE teaching in higher education: A systematic literature review. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 37(4): 509525.
  • Santero, N., E. Masanet, and A. Horvath. 2011. Life-cycle assessment of pavements. Part I: Critical review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 55(9–10): 801809.
  • Sartori, I. and A. Hestnes. 2007. Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article. Energy and Buildings 39(3): 249257.
  • SLS Consulting, Inc. 2008. The environmental impact of the mail: Initial life cycle inventory model and analysis. Available at http://www.postcom.org/eco/USPS_report.pdf. Accessed March 2011.
  • Sovacool, B. 2008. Valuing the greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power: A critical survey. Energy Policy 36(8): 29502963.
  • Staples, M. and M. Niazi. 2007. Experiences using systematic review guidelines. Journal of Systems and Software 80(9): 14251437.
  • Sunde, K., A. Brekke, and B. Solberg. 2011. Environmental impacts and costs of woody biomass-to-liquid (BTL) production and use—A review. Forest Policy and Economics 13(8): 591602.
  • Taubes, G. 1998. The (political) science of salt. Science 281(5379): 898907.
  • Torgerson, C. 2003. The stages of a systematic review. In Systematic reviews . London , UK : Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Tranfield, D., D. Denyer, and P. Smart. 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management 14: 207222.
  • Van Tulder, M., A. Furlan, C. Bombardier, and L. Bouter. 2003. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine 28(12): 12901299.
  • Villanueva, A. and H. Wenzel. 2007. Paper waste—Recycling, incineration or landfilling? A review of existing life cycle assessments. Waste Management 27(8): S29S46.
  • von Blottnitz, H. and M. A. Curran. 2007. A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production 15(7): 607619.
  • von Falkenstein, E., F. Wellenreuther, and A. Detzel. 2010. LCA studies comparing beverage cartons and alternative packaging: Can overall conclusions be drawn? International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15(9): 938945.
  • Werner, F. and K. Richter. 2007. Wooden building products in comparative LCA: A literature review. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(7): 470479.
  • Whitaker, J., K. E. Ludley, R. Rowe, G. Taylor, and D. C. Howard. 2010. Sources of variability in greenhouse gas and energy balances for biofuel production: A systematic review. GCB Bioenergy 2(3): 99112.
  • Zhang, Y., S. Singh, and B. Bakshi. 2010. Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, Part I: A critical review. Environmental Science & Technology 44(7): 22322242.