This study was supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research and Development Service Grant IIR 99-274-1. Results were presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, San Diego, California, November 2003.
Purchasing or Providing Nursing Home Care: Can Quality of Care Data Provide Guidance
Article first published online: 30 MAR 2005
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume 53, Issue 4, pages 603–608, April 2005
How to Cite
Berlowitz, D. R., Rosen, A. K., Wang, F., Tsilimingras, D., Tariot, P. N., Engelhardt, J., Kader, B. and Mukamel, D. B. (2005), Purchasing or Providing Nursing Home Care: Can Quality of Care Data Provide Guidance. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53: 603–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53207.x
- Issue published online: 30 MAR 2005
- Article first published online: 30 MAR 2005
- nursing homes;
- quality of health care;
- risk adjustment;
- outcome assessment
Objectives: To examine whether quality of care differed for veterans in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing homes and those on contract in community nursing homes and whether the VA was contracting with nursing homes providing better quality of care than other nursing homes.
Design: Observational study using administrative databases from 1997 to 1999.
Setting: Ten VA and 650 community nursing homes in New York state.
Participants: Four thousand seven hundred sixty-three veteran and 195,438 nonveteran residents of these nursing homes.
Measurements: Risk-adjusted rates of pressure ulcer development, functional decline, behavioral decline, and mortality.
Results: Veterans in VA nursing homes were significantly (P<.05) less likely to develop a pressure ulcer (odds ratio (OR)=0.63) but more likely to experience functional decline (OR=1.6) than veterans in community nursing homes. Residents of community nursing homes with VA contracts were significantly (P<.05) less likely to develop a pressure ulcer (OR=0.91) but more likely to die than residents in noncontract homes. Few nursing homes were consistently among the best or worst performers on all measures; only seven of 650 nursing homes were in the top or bottom decile and 34 in the top or bottom quartile for each measure.
Conclusion: Large purchasers and providers of nursing home care such as the VA are unlikely to find information on quality of care useful in making decisions on whether they should “make” or “buy” care. Nursing homes performing well on one quality measure may perform poorly on another, and it is difficult to identify nursing homes that are consistently among the best or worst. Other consumers may encounter similar difficulties when using data on nursing home quality.