Translating Evidence-Based Falls Prevention into Clinical Practice in Nursing Facilities: Results and Lessons from a Quality Improvement Collaborative
Article first published online: 24 JUL 2006
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume 54, Issue 9, pages 1414–1418, September 2006
How to Cite
Colón-Emeric, C., Schenck, A., Gorospe, J., McArdle, J., Dobson, L., DePorter, C. and McConnell, E. (2006), Translating Evidence-Based Falls Prevention into Clinical Practice in Nursing Facilities: Results and Lessons from a Quality Improvement Collaborative. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 54: 1414–1418. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00853.x
- Issue published online: 7 SEP 2006
- Article first published online: 24 JUL 2006
- nursing facilities;
- quality improvement
OBJECTIVES: To describe the changes in process of care before and after an evidence-based fall reduction quality improvement collaborative in nursing facilities.
DESIGN: Natural experiment with nonparticipating facilities serving as controls.
SETTING: Community nursing homes.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six participating and 353 nonparticipating nursing facilities in North Carolina.
INTERVENTION: Two in-person learning sessions, monthly teleconferences, and an e-mail discussion list over 9 months. The change package emphasized screening, labeling, and risk-factor reduction.
MEASUREMENTS: Compliance was measured using facility self-report and chart abstraction (n=832) before and after the intervention. Fall rates as measured using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) were compared with those of nonparticipating facilities as an exploratory outcome.
RESULTS: Self-reported compliance with screening, labeling, and risk-factor reduction approached 100%. Chart abstraction revealed only modest improvements in screening (51% to 68%, P<.05), risk-factor reduction (4% to 7%, P=.30), and medication assessment (2% to 6%, P=.34). There was a significant increase in vitamin D prescriptions (40% to 48%, P=.03) and decrease in sedative-hypnotics (19% to 12%, P=.04) but no change in benzodiazepine, neuroleptic, or calcium use. No significant changes in proportions of fallers or fall rates were observed according to chart abstraction (28.6% to 37.5%, P=.17), MDS (18.2% to 15.4%, P=.56), or self-report (6.1–5.6 falls/1,000 bed days, P=.31).
CONCLUSON: Multiple-risk-factor reduction tasks are infrequently implemented, whereas screening tasks appear more easily modifiable in a real-world setting. Substantial differences between self-reported practice and medical record documentation require that additional data sources be used to assess the change-in-care processes resulting from quality improvement programs. Interventions to improve interdisciplinary collaboration need to be developed.