Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot Study: Recruitment and Baseline Characteristics

  1. Jeffrey A. Katula PhD,
  2. Stephen B. Kritchevsky PhD,
  3. Jack M. Guralnik MD, PhD,
  4. Nancy W. Glynn PhD,
  5. Leslie Pruitt PhD,
  6. Kristin Wallace MPH,
  7. Michael P. Walkup MS,
  8. Fang-Chi Hsu PhD,
  9. Stephanie A. Studenski MD,
  10. Thomas M. Gill MD,
  11. Erik J. Groessl PhD,
  12. Jason M. Wallace MPH,
  13. Marco Pahor MD

Article first published online: 20 MAR 2007

DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01136.x

Issue

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Volume 55, Issue 5, pages 674–683, May 2007

Additional Information

How to Cite

Katula, J. A., Kritchevsky, S. B., Guralnik, J. M., Glynn, N. W., Pruitt, L., Wallace, K., Walkup, M. P., Hsu, F.-C., Studenski, S. A., Gill, T. M., Groessl, E. J., Wallace, J. M. and Pahor, M. (2007), Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot Study: Recruitment and Baseline Characteristics. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55: 674–683. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01136.x

Author Information

  1. From the Departments of *Health and Exercise Science, †Internal Medicine-Geriatrics, and ‡Biostatistics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina§Laboratory of Epidemiology, Demography, and Biometry, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland; Departments of ∥EpidemiologyMedicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania#Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, **Department of Internal Medicine-Geriatrics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut††Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California‡‡The Cooper Institute, Dallas, Texas§§Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

*Address correspondence to Jeffrey A. Katula, PhD, MA, Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, PO Box 7868, Reynolda Station, Winston-Salem, NC 27109. E-mail: katulaj@wfu.edu

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 20 MAR 2007
  2. Article first published online: 20 MAR 2007

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (121K)

Keywords:

  • recruitment;
  • clinical trials;
  • prevention of mobility disability;
  • physical activity

OBJECTIVES: To describe several recruitment parameters derived from the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders pilot (LIFE-P) study for use in a full-scale trial of mobility disability prevention.

DESIGN: A description of the recruiting methods and baseline characteristics of a four-site randomized, controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a physical activity intervention at preventing mobility disability.

SETTING: The Cooper Institute, Dallas, Texas; Stanford University, Stanford, California; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

PARTICIPANTS: Community-living persons aged 70 to 89 who were able to walk 400 m within 15 minutes and were at high risk for disability (scoring<10 on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)) but without comorbidity severe enough to preclude full study participation.

MEASUREMENTS: Measures of efficiency included number of randomized participants per recruitment technique and costs per randomized participant across randomization techniques.

RESULTS: The 9-month recruiting period resulted in 3,141 telephone screens, of which 424 (13.5%) participants were randomized (68.9% women, 25.7% minorities, 41.5% with SPPB scores<8). Forty percent of telephone-screened participants were excluded primarily because of regular participation in physical activity, health exclusions, or self-reported mobility disability. Of the 1,252 persons attempting the physical performance assessments, 41% scored above the SPPB cutoff. Of the 566 remaining eligible, 9.9% could not complete the 400-m walk, and another 18.9% had various medical exclusions. Direct mailing was the most productive recruitment strategy (61.6% of all randomized participants). Recruitment cost approximately $439 per randomized participant.

CONCLUSION: The LIFE study achieved all recruitment goals and demonstrated the feasibility of recruiting high-risk community-dwelling older persons for trials of disability prevention in diverse geographic areas.

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (121K)