Decision-Making and Outcomes of Feeding Tube Insertion: A Five-State Study
Version of Record online: 3 MAY 2011
© 2011, Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2011, The American Geriatrics Society
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume 59, Issue 5, pages 881–886, May 2011
How to Cite
Teno, J. M., Mitchell, S. L., Kuo, S. K., Gozalo, P. L., Rhodes, R. L., Lima, J. C. and Mor, V. (2011), Decision-Making and Outcomes of Feeding Tube Insertion: A Five-State Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59: 881–886. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03385.x
- Issue online: 13 MAY 2011
- Version of Record online: 3 MAY 2011
- feeding tube insertion;
OBJECTIVES: To examine family member's perceptions of decision-making and outcomes of feeding tubes.
DESIGN: Mortality follow-back survey. Sample weights were used to account for oversampling and survey design. A multivariate model examined the association between feeding tube use and overall quality of care rating regarding the last week of life.
SETTING: Nursing homes, hospitals, and assisted living facilities.
PARTICIPANTS: Respondents whose relative had died from dementia in five states with varying feeding tube use.
MEASUREMENTS: Respondents were asked about discussions, decision-making, and outcomes related to their loved ones' feeding problems.
RESULTS: Of 486 family members surveyed, representing 9,652 relatives dying from dementia, 10.8% reported that the decedent had a feeding tube, 17.6% made a decision not to use a feeding tube, and 71.6% reported that there was no decision about feeding tubes. Of respondents for decedents with a feeding tube, 13.7% stated that there was no discussion about feeding tube insertion, and 41.6% reported a discussion that was shorter than 15 minutes. The risks associated with feeding tube insertion were not discussed in one-third of the cases, 51.8% felt that the healthcare provider was strongly in favor of feeding tube insertion, and 12.6% felt pressured by the physician to insert a feeding tube. The decedent was often physically (25.9%) or pharmacologically restrained (29.2%). Respondents whose loved ones died with a feeding tube were less likely to report excellent end-of-life care (adjusted odds ratio=0.42, 95% confidence interval=0.18–0.97) than those who were not.
CONCLUSION: Based on the perceptions of bereaved family members, important opportunities exist to improve decision-making in feeding tube insertion.