Subsyndromal Delirium in Older Long-Term Care Residents: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes
Article first published online: 13 SEP 2011
© 2011, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2011, The American Geriatrics Society
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume 59, Issue 10, pages 1829–1836, October 2011
How to Cite
Cole, M. G., McCusker, J., Voyer, P., Monette, J., Champoux, N., Ciampi, A., Vu, M. and Belzile, E. (2011), Subsyndromal Delirium in Older Long-Term Care Residents: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 59: 1829–1836. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03595.x
- Issue published online: 18 OCT 2011
- Article first published online: 13 SEP 2011
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Grant Number: IAO69519
- Canadian Institute of Aging and Institute of Gender and Health. Grant Number: CRG-82953
- Alzheimer Society of Canada
- Canadian Nurses Foundation. Grant Number: 07-91
- subsyndromal delirium;
- risk factors;
- long-term care
To determine the incidence of, risk factors for, and outcomes of subsyndromal delirium (SSD) in older long-term care (LTC) residents and, secondarily, to explore the use of a more-restrictive definition of SSD.
Cohort study with repeated weekly assessments for up to 6 months.
Seven LTC facilities in Montreal and Quebec City, Canada.
One hundred four LTC residents aged 65 and older and free of delirium core symptoms at baseline.
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), Delirium Index (DI), Hierarchic Dementia Scale (HDS), and Barthel Index (BI) were completed at baseline. The MMSE, CAM, and DI were repeated weekly for 6 months. SSD1 required one or more CAM core symptoms; SSD2, a more-restrictive definition, required two or more CAM core symptoms. Outcomes at 6 months were decline on the MMSE, HDS, and BI; mortality; and a composite outcome.
Sixty-eight of 104 residents had SSD1. In survival analysis, the incidence was 5.2 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.1–6.7) per 100 person-weeks of follow-up. In multivariate analysis, risk factors were male sex and more-severe cognitive impairment at baseline. The differences in outcomes between residents with and without SSD1 were small and not statistically significant. SSD2 had a lower incidence (1.3, 95% CI = 0.9–1.9), similar risk factors, and statistically significantly worse cognitive outcomes.
SSD2 appears to be a clinically important disorder in older LTC residents. Despite limited statistical power, these findings have potentially important implications for clinical practice and research in LTC settings.