Presented in part at the American College of Veterinary Surgeons Veterinary Symposium October 21–23, 2010, Seattle, WA.
Original Article - Research
Detection of Articular Pathology of the Distal Aspect of the Third Metacarpal Bone in Thoroughbred Racehorses: Comparison of Radiography, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Version of Record online: 31 OCT 2011
© Copyright 2011 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons
Volume 40, Issue 8, pages 942–951, December 2011
How to Cite
O'Brien, T., Baker, T. A., Brounts, S. H., Sample, S. J., Markel, M. D., Scollay, M. C., Marquis, P. and Muir, P. (2011), Detection of Articular Pathology of the Distal Aspect of the Third Metacarpal Bone in Thoroughbred Racehorses: Comparison of Radiography, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Veterinary Surgery, 40: 942–951. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00881.x
- Issue online: 2 DEC 2011
- Version of Record online: 31 OCT 2011
- Manuscript Accepted: JUL 2011
- Manuscript Received: FEB 2011
- Southern California Equine Foundation
To compare digital radiography (DR), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of pathology of the distal aspect of the third metacarpal bone (MC3) and to assess whether arthrography would improve detection of articular cartilage or subchondral bone cracking.
Limb specimens from 17 Thoroughbred horses after catastrophic injury and 4 age-matched control horses.
Standard DR, CT, and MRI images of the metacarpophalangeal joint were acquired before and after iohexol injection. Pathologic features detected with imaging and on visual inspection of cartilage and subchondral bone of the distal aspect of MC3 were graded. Imaging observations were compared with pathologic abnormalities.
Inspection revealed obvious changes in the cartilage and subchondral bone surfaces in Thoroughbreds. Both CT and MRI were superior to DR for detection of subchondral bone pathology. Cracking of cartilage was not detected by any imaging modality. Signal changes associated with cartilage loss and development of repair tissue were evident on MRI in 9/19 cases. There was significant correlation (P < .05) between subchondral bone pathology detected on both CT and MRI, and cartilage pathology on gross examination. Contrast arthrography did not improve the detection of articular cartilage or subchondral plate cracking.
Both CT and MRI are superior to DR for detection of subchondral bone pathology, but underestimate the extent of joint adaptation and pathologic damage. MRI was able to detect cartilage degeneration.