Get access

THE KNIGHTS OF LABOUR AND THE FAILURE OF THE ARBITRATION PLATFORM, 1886–1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success

Authors

  • Helga Kristín Hallgrímsdóttir

    Corresponding author
    1. University of Victoria
      *Helga Hallgrímsdóttir, Department of Sociology, P.O. Box 3050, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P5, Canada; e-mail: hkbenedi@uvic.ca
    Search for more papers by this author

*Helga Hallgrímsdóttir, Department of Sociology, P.O. Box 3050, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P5, Canada; e-mail: hkbenedi@uvic.ca

Abstract

This article examines the reasons why the Knights of Labour, a labor movement that enjoyed enormous popularity and success during the penultimate decade of the 19th century, were unable to construct a resonant cultural frame in support of their platform of arbitration. The theoretical framework employed in this article is constructed by importing two concepts from political process models of social movement action into culturalist accounts, historical environment (or context), and opportunity. This framework allows me to look at how historical environments offer transient openings for the effective construction of counterhegemonic or subversive collective action frames. I argue that opportunity for framing has to do with the intersection between the signification requisites of framing practices, and the systemic features of cultural environments. I find that the nature of this opportunity in the years between 1885 and 1887 helps explain why movement practice within the Knights of Labour diverged so significantly from the practices advocated by its leadership.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary