Unexpected suppression of anti-Fya and prevention of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn after administration of Rh immune globulin
Article first published online: 7 OCT 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02905.x
© 2010 American Association of Blood Banks
Additional Information
How to Cite
Branch, D. R., Scofield, T. L., Moulds, J. J. and Swanson, J. L. (2011), Unexpected suppression of anti-Fya and prevention of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn after administration of Rh immune globulin. Transfusion, 51: 816–819. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02905.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 15 APR 2011
- Article first published online: 7 OCT 2010
- Received for publication March 18, 2010; revision received August 13, 2010, and accepted August 17, 2010.
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
BACKGROUND: Rh immune globulin (RhIG) has been used successfully for many years for the antenatal suppression of anti-D in D– mothers carrying D+ babies to prevent hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Although the mechanism of RhIG-induced immunosuppression remains unknown, a recent report (TRANSFUSION 2006;46:1316-22) has shown that women receiving RhIG produce elevated levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)β-1, a powerful immunosuppressant cytokine. It was suggested that induction of TGFβ-1 and immunosuppression may be independent of cognate antigen recognition by RhIG. Herein, we present a description of a mother and baby that supports this hypothesis.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Red blood cells and serum were analyzed using saline-tube indirect antiglobulin test methods. RhIG (RhoGAM) was administered after each amniocentesis performed at 28, 31, and 36 weeks' gestation.
RESULTS: A group A, D–(cde), K+, Fy(a−b+), MNs, Jk(a+b+) mother with no detectable anti-D had an anti-Fya titer of 4096 before RhIG but only 256 after RhIG. Mother gave birth to a group O, D–(cde), Fy(a+b+) healthy baby boy having a weak-positive direct antiglobulin test with anti-Fya eluted from his cells and the titer in the cord serum was 4.
CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates the potential immunosuppressive properties of RhIG for down regulation of a possible clinically significant alloantibody, not anti-D, where no D+ antigen is in the circulation of the mother. The case illustrates the potential utility for using RhIG to modulate antibody levels in situations other than for classical suppression of anti-D production. Although the mechanism in this case is unknown, TGFβ-1–mediated or antibody-mediated immunosuppression to soluble nonparticulate antigens are possible mechanisms.

1537-2995/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=05048e38d3df7bca9b579f6801d4ffb0d1f36a40)
1537-2995/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=80a40f0b52bfb45a42076cd036b6ddb39ff98029)
