SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • chronic venous disease;
  • post-thrombotic syndrome;
  • thrombolytic therapy;
  • venous insufficiency;
  • venous thrombosis

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Patients and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Addendum
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. Disclosure of Conflict of Interests
  10. References

Summary. Background: Approximately one in four patients with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) given anticoagulation and compression therapy develop post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Accelerated removal of thrombus by thrombolytic agents may increase patency and prevent PTS. Objectives: To assess short-term efficacy of additional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) compared with standard treatment alone. Patients and methods: Open, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Patients (18–75 years) with iliofemoral DVT and symptoms < 21 days were randomized to receive additional CDT or standard treatment alone. After 6 months, iliofemoral patency was investigated using duplex ultrasound and air-plethysmography assessed by an investigator blinded to previous treatment. Results: One hundred and three patients (64 men, mean age 52 years) were allocated additional CDT (n = 50) or standard treatment alone (n = 53). After CDT, grade III (complete) lysis was achieved in 24 and grade II (50%–90%) lysis in 20 patients. One patient suffered major bleeding and two had clinically relevant bleeding related to the CDT procedure. After 6 months, iliofemoral patency was found in 32 (64.0%) in the CDT group vs. 19 (35.8%) controls, corresponding to an absolute risk reduction (RR) of 28.2% (95% CI: 9.7%–46.7%; P = 0.004). Venous obstruction was found in 10 (20.0%) in the CDT group vs. 26 (49.1%) controls; absolute RR 29.1% (95% CI: 20.0%–38.0%; P = 0.004). Femoral venous insufficiency did not differ between the two groups. Conclusions: After 6 months, additional CDT increased iliofemoral patency from 36% to 64%. The ongoing long-term follow-up of this study will document whether patency is related to improved functional outcome.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Patients and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Addendum
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. Disclosure of Conflict of Interests
  10. References

Current guidelines for treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limb recommend anticoagulant therapy for the prevention of thrombus extension and recurrence, pulmonary embolism and death (grade IA recommendation) [1]. Daily wear of class II (30 mmHg) elastic compression stockings (ECS) decreases the risk of a chronically reduced functional outcome, that is, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Still one in four will develop PTS within 2 years after the thrombotic event [2,3]. There is therefore a great need for improved therapy that can improve long-term functional outcome. A recent systematic review including 12 studies found that additional thrombolytic therapy for rapid dissolution of thrombotic material in acute DVT may offer advantages in terms of reducing PTS and maintaining venous patency [4]. However, systemic thrombolytic therapy is associated with an unacceptably high risk of bleeding and is not recommended for the treatment of acute DVT [1]. Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with local delivery of the thrombolytic agent significantly reduces the total dose required for dissolution of a venous thrombus. A case series on CDT revealed a high rate of technically successful thrombolysis at the expense of only a small additional increase in bleeding complications [5–9]. Just one very small randomized controlled trial with short-term follow-up has been performed [10]. Based on this evidence the recent 2008 guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians were modified to recommend CDT in selected patients (grade IIB recommendation) [1]. However, properly designed multi-center randomized controlled trials adhering to recent reporting standards are required to enable an evidence-based practice for venous thrombolytic therapy [11,12]. Accordingly, the ongoing Catheter-directed Venous Thrombolysis in acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis trial (the CaVenT Study) aims to evaluate safety and efficacy of site-directed thrombolysis. The present study reports on short-term results with emphasis on venous patency after 6 months.

Patients and methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Patients and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Addendum
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. Disclosure of Conflict of Interests
  10. References

Study participants

Patients were recruited from 19 hospitals within the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, which serves a population of 2.6 million people. Patients aged 18–75 years with a first-time objectively verified iliofemoral DVT (± popliteal and calf vein thrombosis) were eligible for inclusion if symptoms had lasted < 21 days. Complete inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in Table 1. Prior to treatment allocation, written informed consent was obtained. The study protocol was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (East) and the Norwegian Medicine Agency.

Table 1.   Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
 Age 18–75 years
 Onset of symptoms < 21 days
 Objectively verified deep vein thrombosis localized in the upper half of the thigh, the common iliac vein or the combined iliofemoral segment
 Informed consent
Exclusion criteria
 Anticoagulant therapy prior to trial entry for > 7 days
 Contraindications to thrombolytic therapy, including bleeding diathesis
 Indications for thrombolytic therapy, for example, phlegmacia coerolia dolens or isolated vena cava thrombosis
 Severe anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g dL−1)
 Thrombocytopenia (platelets < 80 × 109 L−1)
 Severe renal failure – estimated creatinine clearance < 30 mL min−1
 Severe hypertension, that is, persistant systolic blood pressure > 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 100 mmHg
 Pregnancy and thrombosis ≤7 days postpartum
 Less than 14 days postsurgery or post-trauma
 History of subarachnoidal or intracerebral bleeding
 Disease with life expectancy < 24 months
 Drug abuse or mental disease that may interfere with treatment and follow-up
 Former ipsilateral proximal deep vein thrombosis
 Malignant disease requiring chemotherapy
 Any thrombolytic therapy within 7 days prior to trial inclusion

Study design

The study design has previously been published [13]. Patients were randomized to conventional treatment alone or CDT in addition to conventional treatment. A random block allocation sequence for each hospital with stratification for involvement of the pelvic veins and block size of six was generated using the Web site Randomization.com (http://www.randomization.com). Enrolment and treatment assignment were performed by the local trial investigator by picking the lowest number of sealed, opaque-numbered envelopes.

The CaVenT Study was designed with two primary end points: long-term functional efficacy end point was frequency of PTS after 24 months, and short-term descriptive efficacy end point was patency after 6 months [13]. For sample size calculation, we assumed that expected prevalence of PTS after 2 years was 25% in those allocated conventional therapy compared with 10% in those given additional CDT. With a significance level of 5% and a statistical power of 80%, 200 patients (100 in each group) must be included in the study. For short-term efficacy and with the same power, we calculated that at least 38 patients were required in each treatment arm to detect an increase in venous patency from 50% in patients allocated conventional treatment to 80% in those given additional CDT. Using this background, we decided a priori to analyze results on short-term patency on a subpopulation of the first 100 patients with 6 months data.

Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy

Anticoagulant therapy was given in accordance with local routines based on international guidelines using low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) followed by oral warfarin for at least 6 months with a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0–3.0 [1]. Patients allocated CDT were transferred to the nearest of four interventional centers, and CDT was started on the next workday. Meanwhile the patients received subcutaneous LMWH.

Before the CDT procedure, LMWH was discontinued for at least 8 h, and oral anticoagulants were discontinued to obtain an INR < 1.5. At the start of CDT, an intravenous bolus dose of unfractionated heparin (UFH), 5000 U, was given followed by a continuous intravenous UFH infusion at 15 U kg−1 h−1. The UFH dose was adjusted to keep activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) (Cephotest®; Axis-Shield, Oslo, Norway) at 1.2–1.7 times prolongation, that is, at 40–60 s, during CDT.

After applying a local anesthetic, an introducer was inserted into an appropriate vein, preferentially the popliteal vein, guided by ultrasound. At the discretion of the operator, the calf or inguinal veins were other options for venous access. Venography was performed to determine the extent of the thrombus. The wire and catheter were advanced above the proximal part of the thrombus and fitting-sized perfusion catheters, for example, 10, 20, 30, or 50 cm, were positioned. CDT was discontinued if introduction of the catheter through the occluded segment was not successful. Next, 20 mg of alteplase (Actilyse®; Boehringer-Ingelheim, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany) diluted in 500 mL 0.9% NaCl was infused at 0.01 mg kg−1h−1 with a maximal dose of 20 mg per 24 h and maximal duration of 96 h. Treatment continued in a medical ward. Blood pressure and pulse were recorded and puncture site was inspected four times daily. Hemostasis was also monitored by daily analysis of hemoglobin, fibrinogen and platelet counts, and APTT was monitored twice daily for adjustment of heparin dose.

Thrombolysis was assessed daily by venography using a contrast injection through the introducer and/or perfusion catheter. Each vein segment, that is, IVC, the common iliac vein, the external iliac vein, the common femoral vein, the proximal and distal superficial femoral veins, and the popliteal vein, were given a score, where 0 = open vein, 1 = partly occluded vein, and 2 = completely occluded vein. Total thrombus score before and after lysis was calculated by adding the segmental scores. The difference between the pre- and post-lysis thrombus scores divided by the pre-lysis score gave the grade of thrombolysis; grade I = < 50%; grade II = 50%–90%, and grade III = complete thrombolysis [8]. Duration of CDT and use of adjunctive angioplasty and stents to establish flow and obtain < 50% residual stenosis were at the discretion of the operator.

During CDT, concomitant use of antithrombotic agents other than UFH was discontinued. Overt bleeding and symptoms suspect of bleeding or pulmonary embolism were dealt with according to local routines. Any complication of clinical relevance was reported to the Safety and Monitoring Committee. There were no established stopping rules for the study. Bleeding was classified as major if it was overt with a decrease of ≥ 2 g dL−1 hemoglobin, led to transfusion of ≥ 2 units packed red blood cells, was retroperitoneal, intracranial, or in a critical organ, or if it contributed to death. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding included, for example, intervention for epistaxis, a visible large hematoma, or spontaneous macroscopic hematuria [14]. All other hemorrhages were categorized as trivial.

A weight-adjusted full therapeutic dose of subcutaneous LMWH given twice daily was initiated 1 h after removal of catheters. Oral anticoagulation was then established as described earlier and according to guidelines.

Immediately after CDT or otherwise as soon as possible after entering the study, all patients received knee-high ECS class II and were advised daily wear for 24 months.

Assessment at 6 months follow-up

Short-term end-point evaluation by non-invasive assessment of the veins of all patients in both treatment groups was performed after 6 months ± 2 weeks by one angiologist (C.E.S.), who was unaware of the patient’s treatment allocation and medical history. To further secure an unbiased evaluation of outcomes, the patients were explicitly informed not to reveal which treatment they had received [15]. There was no adjudication committee. Uncertainties were agreed by consensus among three of the investigators (N.E.K., P.M.S. and T.E.).

The venous system was evaluated using ultrasound and air-plethysmography. Gray-scale ultrasound was used for detection of post-thrombotic iliofemoral wall-thickening and intraluminal hyperechoic structures. Compression ultrasound assessed compressibility of the femoral vein. Doppler ultrasound was used to evaluate iliofemoral venous flow and femoral venous insufficiency. Insufficiency was evaluated with the patient in the standing position, and reflux was defined as reversal of the velocity curve lasting longer than 0.5 s after standardized distal pneumatic decompression [16]. Functional obstruction of the veins was assessed using air plethysmography [17].

Venous patency was defined as a composite outcome measure where patients having any of the following were classified as not having regained iliofemoral venous patency: partial or complete incompressibility of the femoral vein, no flow in pelvic or femoral vein and/or functional venous obstruction. Patients with duplicate femoral veins with normal compressibility and flow in at least one course and without functional obstruction were considered successfully recanalized.

Statistical analysis

When comparing dichotomous variables in the two treatment groups, a two-sided χ2-test was used. When comparing continuous variables, a two-sided Mann–Whitney test was used. Correlations were calculated using Pearson’s product–moment coefficient. Findings with P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package spss, version 15 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Role of the funding source

Study sponsors had no involvement in study design, collection, analyses, and interpretation of data, or writing and submission for publication.

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Patients and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Addendum
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. Disclosure of Conflict of Interests
  10. References

Figure 1 shows the trial profile of the 118 patients recruited and randomized between January 2006 and January 2008. Patients’ baseline characteristics of each treatment group are summarized in Table 2. Based on enrolment rate complete recruitment of 200 patients in the CaVenT Study is expected late 2009.

image

Figure 1.  Trail Profile. AC, anticoagulation; CDT, catheter-directed thrombolysis, ECS, elastic compression stockings, VCI, vena cava inferior.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Table 2.   Characteristics of treatment groups
 Catheter-directed thrombolysis group (n = 50)Standard treatment group (n = 53)
  1. Data are mean (SD) or n (%). *Based on routine diagnostic imaging before recruitment. Ipsilateral proximal deep vein thrombosis exclusion criterion. One homozygous factor V Leiden. §Protein S combined with homozygous prothrombin G20210A and prothrombin G20210A combined with lupus antiocoagulant (both in CDT group), protein C combined with factor V Leiden and protein S combined with prothrombin G20210A (both in standard treatment group).

Demographics
 Age (years)53.0 (16.8)51.3 (15.8)
 Male32 (64.0)32 (60.4)
 Left-sided deep vein thrombosis32 (64.0)33 (62.3)
 Femoral deep vein thrombosis*24 (48.0)30 (56.6)
 Iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis*26 (52.0)23 (43.4)
 Duration of symptoms (days)6.1 (4.1)6.7 (4.5)
 Duplicate femoral vein13 (26.0)18 (34.0)
 Recurrent venous thrombosis2 (4.0)1 (1.9)
 D-dimer at 6 months (mg L−1)0.17 (0.32)0.18 (0.37)
 Daily wear of compression stockings class II36 (72.0)36 (69.2)
 Comorbidity of the lower limb11 (22.0)12 (22.6)
 Familial disposition of various veins15 (31.3)23 (45.1)
Transient risk factors for venous thrombosis
 Surgery previous 3 months3 (6.0)3 (5.7)
 Trauma previous 3 months4 (8.0)8 (15.1)
 Short-term immobility10 (20.0)10 (18.9)
 Infection in the previous 6 weeks4 (8.0)6 (11.3)
 Pregnancy in the previous 3 months4 (8.0)0
 Hormonal replacement therapy4 (8.0)3 (5.7)
 Oral contraceptive pill1 (2.0)6 (11.3)
Permanent risk factors for venous thrombosis
 Previous venous thrombosis5 (10.0)4 (7.5)
 Previously known malignancy at baseline2 (4.0)1 (1.9)
 Obesity4 (8.0)5 (9.4)
 Inflammatory bowel disease03 (5.6)
 First degree relative with venous thrombosis7 (14.0)8 (15.1)
Thrombophilia
 Factor V Leiden14 (28.)11 (20.8)
 Prothrombin G20210A2 (4.0)1 (1.9)
 Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A2 (4.0)0
 Protein C deficiency01 (1.9)
 Protein S deficiency1 (2.0)4 (7.5)
 Lupus anticoagulant01 (1.9)
 Any other combination of the above§2 (4.0)2 (3.8)

Four patients in the CDT arm withdrew from the study before CDT was initiated. After randomization, four patients in ther CDT group were found not to satisfy eligibility criteria; two patients had exclusion criterion, that is, one alcohol abuse with bleeding tendency and one previous traumatic cerebral bleeding; and two did not have any signs of acute thrombosis on venography during CDT procedure, consequently not satisfying inclusion criteria and representing false–positive findings on routine compression ultrasound. These eight patients were excluded from the analyses.

Missing outcome data on seven more participants were not included in the primary analysis as these data were assumed to be missing independent of treatment received; one patient in the CDT group was not reached, one control withdrew from the study, three controls died of cancer (of whom two were diagnosed during follow-up), and two controls had inconclusive assessments of the veins because of obesity. The statistical analyses were performed on 103 patients; 53 in the control group received standard treatment alone, whereas 50 received interventional therapy, including one procedure without establishment of thrombolytic infusion as a result of technical failure from agenesis of the vena cava inferior. One patient did not receive CDT at the operator’s discretion owing to DVT in the distal femoral vein only at the initiation of CDT procedure. These two patients resulted in ineffective (grade I) lysis.

In the CDT group, 50%–90% lysis (grade II lysis) was achieved in 20 patients, and complete lysis (grade III) in 24 patients. Lysis grade did not correlate with duration of symptoms (results not shown). Two patients received CDT for 6 days; both resulted in grade II lysis. Among the four CDT procedures resulting in grade I lysis, two were prematurely ended because of bleeding complications; one developed compartment syndrome of the calf, and one encountered clinically relevant bleeding from the inguinal puncture site. Mean duration of CDT was 2.3 (SD 1.2) days. Angioplasty of the iliofemoral vein segment with balloon only or additional stenting was performed in 13 and eight patients (of whom two were femoral stents), respectively.

Safety outcomes

Hemostasis monitoring by daily analysis of hemoglobin, fibrinogen, D-dimer, INR and platelet count did not reveal or indicate occult bleeding in any of the patients undergoing CDT, or lead to modification of the therapy. A total of 10 overt bleeding complications were reported in relation to the 49 CDT procedures. Major complications were reported in two patients; one required surgery because of compartment syndrome of the calf after local bleeding, and one patient contracted durable and partial impairment of sensibility of the foot immediately after the procedure. Two patients suffered clinically relevant non-major bleeding; one developed an inguinal hematoma of approximately 100 cm2 in relation to an inguinal puncture site, and one developed a > 100 cm2 subcutaneous hematoma of the abdomen as a result of erroneous administration of heparin (five times prescribed dosage). Minor complications without clinical relevance occurred in five patients with bleeding from the puncture site, one patient suffered epistaxis lasting 3 days, and one developed a small subcutaneous hematoma of the shoulder. There were no pulmonary embolizations or deaths related to CDT.

Two patients experienced bleeding complications related to antiocagulation during follow-up; one female reported an episode of gynecological bleeding and one male needed surgical evacuation of a hematoma in relation to a muscle rupture of the calf after 5 months on warfarin. None of these had received CDT. There were no bleeding complications during acute standard treatment.

Efficacy outcomes at 6 months

Patency of the iliofemoral vein segment was found in 32 (64.0%) patients in the CDT group and 19 (35.8%) in the control group, corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 28.2% (95% CI: 9.7%–46.7%; P = 0.004). When the same analysis was performed on all 118 randomized patients assuming no patency in patients with missing data, the difference between the treatment groups remained statistically significant (P = 0.026).

Venous obstruction as assessed by air plethysmography was found in 10 (20.0%) patients in the CDT group and in 26 (49.1%) controls, corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 29.1% (95% CI: 20.0%–38.0%; P = 0.004). The two other subcategories of venous patency, that is, compressibility and flow, and other post-thrombotic changes of the iliofemoral veins, that is, wall thickening and echoic content of vein lumen, did not differ significantly between the two treatment arms (Table 3). Femoral venous insufficiency was found in 35 (66.0%) and 30 (60.0%) limbs among controls and in the CDT group, respectively (P = 0.53). Duration of femoral reflux time did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.94).

Table 3.   Non-invasive assessment of veins 6 months after iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (n = 103)
 Catheter-directed thrombolysis (n = 50) N (%)Standard treatment (n = 53) N (%)P-value
  1. *Single or duplicate femoral vein.

Iliofemoral patency32 (64.0)19 (35.8)0.004
Functional venous obstruction10 (20.0)26 (49.1)0.004
Femoral venous insufficiency*30 (60.0)35 (66.0)0.53
Other post-thrombotic changes
 Pelvic vein
  Echoic lumen4 (8.0)3 (5.7)0.66
  Wall thickening4 (8.0)7 (13.2)0.37
  No flow1 (2.0)1 (1.9)0.67
 Femoral vein*
  Incompressibility17 (34.0)26 (49.1)0.12
  Echoic lumen20 (40.0)31 (58.5)0.07
  Wall thickening25 (50.0)26 (49.1)0.92
  No flow4 (8.0)7 (13.2)0.45

Among the 50 patients in the CDT arm, lysis grade or use of angioplasty/stent did not significantly correlate with 6-months patency. Five out of six patients with ineffective lysis (grade I) and approximately 60% of the patients with effective lysis (grade II and III) had regained iliofemoral patency. After CDT without adjunctive endovascular therapy, 17 out of 29 patients regained patency (Table 4). In patients who received adjunctive angioplasty or angioplasty with stent, patency was regained in nine out of 13, and six out of eight, respectively. Table 4 also shows lysis grade for CDT with and without angioplasty.

Table 4.   Immediate lysis grade and 6-months patency after catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) (n = 50)
Endovascular therapyLysis grade/patency
Immediate lysis grade* after CDT NPatency after 6 months N (%)
IIIIII
  1. *Grade I, <50% lysis; grade II, 50%–90% lysis; grade III, complete lysis. One patient with grade III lost to 6 months follow-up was not included. Including one technical failure and one that did not receive thrombolytic infusion.

CDT only (n = 29)471817 (58.6)
CDT and balloon angioplasty (n = 13)11029 (69.2)
CDT, balloon angioplasty, and stent (n = 8)1346 (75.0)
All6202432 (64.0)

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Patients and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Addendum
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. Disclosure of Conflict of Interests
  10. References

The ongoing CaVenT Study is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate relevant clinical effects of additional CDT in acute DVT of the lower limb, and additional CDT increased 6-months patency from 36% to 64% as compared with standard anticoagulant treatment and use of ECS.

It is believed that PTS evolves from continued venous hypertension as a result of persisting venous obstruction and/or venous insufficiency after inflammatory destruction of valves in response to acute DVT [18]. From observational studies, it has been shown that repeated DVT of the limb is associated with PTS development [12,19]. Other factors, that is, characteristics and symptoms of index DVT, thrombophilia, overweight and gender, have been shown to be inconsistently associated with an increased risk of PTS [12,19]. Early recanalization is suggested to protect against valve destruction and development of PTS, but the relationship between early recanalization and long-term functional outcome of the limb has yet to be documented. We found that CDT reduced functional venous obstruction from 49% to 20%, whereas venous insufficiency was not significantly reduced and occurred in 60% after CDT and 66% controls. Different cut-off values have been used for ultrasonographic assessment of venous reflux, however, when increasing the cut-off to 1.0 s as suggested by Labropoulos and colleagues [20], still 52% and 51% in CDT and control group, respectively, had insufficiency (P = 0.92). This may indicate that if CDT reduces development of PTS this is because of a reduction in obstruction, but not insufficiency.

Among the 12 studies in the systematic review of Watson and colleagues [4] on thrombolysis for acute DVT, only six reported on patency after 6 months, including one study on local administration of a thrombolytic agent. The six studies combined indicated patency in 43% after thrombolytic therapy vs. 17% in the control group, and the trial of Elsharawy and colleagues [10] on 35 patients reported complete lysis in 72% after CDT vs. 12% in the control group. Other studies have found 6–12 months patency in 38%–50% after standard treatment [21]. Three case series on CDT reported 6 months patency to be 83%, 85% and 100% [22–24]. These efficacy estimates are consistent with our findings.

The study of Elsharawy differed from the CaVenT study in some aspects; CDT included streptokinase and pulse-spray administration, reflux was assessed using plethysmography, and assessment of patency involved ultrasound and/or venography. Duration of anticoagulant therapy or use of ECS was not reported, and it is unclear how venous outflow obstruction related to patency. Our study allowed patients with up to 21-days history of DVT symptoms compared with < 10 days, however, mean duration of symptoms in patients receiving CDT was 6 days in both studies. The apparent smaller effect compared with Elsharawy’s study regarding the secondary efficacy estimates on venous obstruction and insufficiency, are likely to be explained by the relatively small sample sizes of the studies. In the CaVenT study, approximately 60% of the patients developed venous insufficiency after 6 months, and this is in line with previous reports [25–27].

The CDT procedure was successful in the great majority of patients; complete lysis was achieved in 48%, and 50%–90% lysis in 40% of the patients. This is consistent with previous reports [5–9]. One episode of major bleeding was seen related to the CDT procedure, indicating that safety was at least as good as previously reported. Bleeding complications are usually related to puncture of the vein at the start of CDT procedure, and are more likely to occur if the initial puncture did not secure venous access. This was the likely explanation of calf hematoma leading to the development of compartment syndrome. The mechanism explaining the partly, but durable sensibility impairment of the foot in one patient is unclear, but may relate to nerve damage during the procedure.

The CaVenT study is a properly designed, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. However, the non-blinded design is unavoidably open to challenge for bias. Another limitation of our study is the lack of information on number and characteristics of patients screened for eligibility as this would give additional and valuable information on the generalizability of the results. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the CaVenT study, we believe that the recruited population is representative for patients potentially benefitting from CDT. The relatively slow recruitment rate may indicate selection bias, however, we have not been able to identify such, and no eligible patients received CDT during the inclusion period if not included in the CaVenT study.

Inherent in the CDT procedure is venography performed initially to map the extent of thrombi, and this allows for a more detailed and possibly more reliable visualization of the thrombi compared with routine imaging with ultrasound. Consequently, after randomization, two patients in the CDT arm were found not to fulfill the inclusion criteria of iliofemoral DVT. Two more patients were found to possess exclusion criteria, and this was probably because of additional clinical routines regarding contraindications to thrombolysis. This may introduce bias and a systematic difference between the treatment groups as similar patients may not have been found ineligible if allocated standard treatment. Another difference that may lead to bias between the two groups is the unfortunate fact that four patients decided to withdraw from the study after randomization to CDT, compared with only one in the control group. Possible explanations may be inadequate information at recruitment, reluctance to transfer to another hospital, or early improvement of symptoms with LMWH therapy while awaiting CDT start-up. We decided not to include these patients in the primary analysis as they were lost to follow-up before receiving treatment.

A matter of discussion is the handling of the missing data in the statistical analyses. The difference in patency between the treatment groups remained significant when we included all randomized patients by giving patients with missing data the outcome ‘no patency’ in the analyses. This finding indicates that our conclusion as regards the difference in patency cannot be explained by missing data.

We are also aware of the potential weakness of using envelope-based randomization as misconduct among investigators has been reported [28]. To our knowledge there was no such misconduct in this study. The choice of randomization method was a matter of trial costs; computer-based randomization is hardly prone to misconduct, but also substantially more costly.

In conclusion, additional CDT increased patency 6 months after iliofemoral DVT, from 36% to 64%. Venous obstruction, but not venous insufficiency, was significantly reduced in the CDT group. The clinical relevance of these findings with regard to development of PTS is still unknown, but future long-term data from the CaVenT study will provide evidence on the functional outcome after CDT.

Addendum

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Patients and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Addendum
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. Disclosure of Conflict of Interests
  10. References

T.E.: study design, data collection, data analysis and writing of manuscript. N.-E.K.: original idea, study design, data analysis and manuscript review. L.S.: study design, statistical analysis and manuscript review. C.-E.S.: study design, data collection, and manuscript review. W.G.: study design, data collection and manuscript review. G.H.: study design, data collection and manuscript review. P.A.H.: study design, data collection and manuscript review. L.O.H.: study design, data collection and manuscript review. A.M.N.: study design, data collection and manuscript review. G.S.: study design, data collection and manuscript review. P.M.S.: original idea, study design, data analysis and manuscript review.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Patients and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Addendum
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. Disclosure of Conflict of Interests
  10. References

We would like to thank the patients who by agreeing to participate made the study possible. Thanks to the following physicians in South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority for invaluable contributions in recruitment of patients and collection of data: W. Aasebø, G. K. Bekken, Y. Benestad, Ø. Bukten, J. Dalgaard, O. Hagen, T. O. Isaksen, M. Kalbakken, E. Müller, M. Myrstad, E. Nyquist, H. Pihlstrøm, J. Rolke, V. Stenberg, A. Tveit, and P. O. Vandvik. Thanks for great help from the study nurses S. Foyn, K. Hulbekkmo og T. N. Moan. The original trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 00251771). The study was supported by a grant from Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority Trust (fellowship to TE), the Research Council of Norway (grant no. 175465/V50), and the University of Oslo. Funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, or writing and submission of article.

Disclosure of Conflict of Interests

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Patients and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Addendum
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. Disclosure of Conflict of Interests
  10. References

The authors state that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Patients and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Addendum
  8. Acknowledgements
  9. Disclosure of Conflict of Interests
  10. References
  • 1
    Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G, Goldhaber S, Raskob GE, Comerota AJ. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133: 454S545S.
  • 2
    Brandjes DP, Buller HR, Heijboer H, Huisman MV, De Rijk RM, Jagt H, Ten Cate JW. Randomised trial of effect of compression stockings in patients with symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1997; 349: 75962.
  • 3
    Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Prins MH, Frulla M, Marchiori A, Bernardi E, Tormene D, Mosena L, Pagnan A, Girolami A. Below-knee elastic compression stockings to prevent the post-thrombotic syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141: 24956.
  • 4
    Watson LI, Armon MP. Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; CD002783.
  • 5
    Semba CP, Razavi MK, Kee ST, Sze DY, Dake MD. Thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 7: 6878.
  • 6
    Bjarnason H, Kruse JR, Asinger DA, Nazarian GK, Dietz CA Jr, Caldwell MD, Key NS, Hirsch AT, Hunter DW. Iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: safety and efficacy outcome during 5 years of catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997; 8: 40518.
  • 7
    Ly B, Njaastad AM, Sandbaek G, Solstrand R, Rosales A, Slagsvold CE. [Catheter-directed thrombolysis of iliofemoral venous thrombosis]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2004; 124: 47880.
  • 8
    Mewissen MW, Seabrook GR, Meissner MH, Cynamon J, Labropoulos N, Haughton SH. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry. Radiology 1999; 211: 3949.
  • 9
    Sillesen H, Just S, Jorgensen M, Baekgaard N. Catheter directed thrombolysis for treatment of ilio-femoral deep venous thrombosis is durable, preserves venous valve function and may prevent chronic venous insufficiency. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 30: 55662.
  • 10
    Elsharawy M, Elzayat E. Early results of thrombolysis vs anticoagulation in iliofemoral venous thrombosis. A randomised clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 24: 20914.
  • 11
    Vedantham S, Grassi CJ, Ferral H, Patel NH, Thorpe PE, Antonacci VP, D’Othée BM, Hofmann LV, Cardella JF, Kundu S, Lewis CA, Schwartzberg MS, Min RJ, Sacks D. Reporting standards for endovascular treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17: 41734.
  • 12
    Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA, Ducruet T, Arsenault L, Miron MJ, Roussin A, Desmarais S, Joyal F, Kassis J, Solymoss S, Desjardins L, Lamping DL, Johri M, Ginsberg JS. Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 2008; 149: 698707.
  • 13
    Enden T, Sandvik L, Klow NE, Hafsahl G, Holme PA, Holmen LO, Ghanima W, Njaastad AM, Sandbaek G, Slagsvold CE, Sandset PM. Catheter-directed venous thrombolysis in acute iliofemoral vein thrombosis-the CaVenT Study: rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial (NCT00251771). Am Heart J 2007; 154: 80814.
  • 14
    The Matisse Investigators. Subcutaneous fondaparinux versus intravenous unfractionated heparin in the initial treatment of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1695702.
  • 15
    Furberg CD, Soliman EZ. Double-blindness protects scientific validity. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 2301.
    Direct Link:
  • 16
    Coleridge-Smith P, Labropoulos N, Partsch H, Myers K, Nicolaides A, Cavezzi A. Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins in chronic venous disease of the lower limbs-UIP consensus document. Part I. Basic principles. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 31: 8392.
  • 17
    Nicolaides AN. Investigation of chronic venous insufficiency: a consensus statement (France, March 5–9, 1997). Circulation 2000; 102: E12663.
  • 18
    Kahn SR. The post-thrombotic syndrome: progress and pitfalls. Br J Haematol 2006; 134: 35765.
  • 19
    Kahn SR, Ginsberg JS. The post-thrombotic syndrome: current knowledge, controversies, and directions for future research. Blood Rev 2002; 16: 15565.
  • 20
    Labropoulos N, Tiongson J, Pryor L, Tassiopoulos AK, Kang SS, Ashraf MM, Baker WH. Definition of venous reflux in lower-extremity veins. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38: 7938.
  • 21
    Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107 (Suppl. 1): I2230.
  • 22
    AbuRahma AF. Iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: conventional therapy versus lysis and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting. Ann Surg 2001; 233: 75260.
  • 23
    Protack CD, Bakken AM, Patel N, Saad WE, Waldman DL, Davies MG. Long-term outcomes of catheter directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis without prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45: 9927.
  • 24
    Chang R, Chen CC, Kam A, Mao E, Shawker TH, Horne MK III. Deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity: direct intraclot injection of alteplase once daily with systemic anticoagulation – results of pilot study. Radiology 2008; 246: 61929.
  • 25
    Singh H, Masuda EM. Comparing short-term outcomes of femoral-popliteal and iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: early lysis and development of reflux. Ann Vasc Surg 2005; 19: 749.
  • 26
    Johnson BF, Manzo RA, Bergelin RO, Strandness J. Relationship between changes in the deep venous system and the development of the postthrombotic syndrome after an acute episode of lower limb deep vein thrombosis: a one- to six-year follow-up. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21: 30713.
  • 27
    Heldal M, Seem E, Sandset PM, Abildgaard U. Deep vein thrombosis: a 7-year follow-up study. J Intern Med 1993; 234: 715.
  • 28
    Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering. Lancet 2002; 359: 6148.