SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    P. Slovic, B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein, “Why Study Risk Perception Risk Analysis 2, 8394 (1982).
  • 2
    O. Renn, “Risk Perception: A Systematic Review of Concepts and Research Results,” in Avoiding and Managing Environmental Damage from Major Industrial Accidents, Proceedings of the Air Pollution Control Association International Conference in Vancouver, Canada , November 1985 (The Association, Pittsburgh, 1986), pp. 377408.
  • 3
    S. Rayner and R. Cantor, “How Fair is Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice,” Risk Analysis 7, 313 (1987).
  • 4
    P. Slovic, “Perception of Risk,” Science 236, 280290 (1987).
  • 5
    C. A. Vlek and P. J. M. Stallen, “Judging Risks and Benefits in the Small and the Large,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 28, 235271 (1981).
  • 6
    J. M. Doderlein, “Understanding Risk Management,” Risk Analysis 3, 1721 (1983).
  • 7
    R. E.Kasperson, (ed.), Equity Issues in Radioactive Waste Management ( Cambridge , Oelgeschlager , Gunn and Hain, 1983).
  • 8
    H. J. Otway and D. von Winterfeldt, “Beyond Acceptable Risk: On the Social Acceptability of Technologies,” Policy Sciences 14, 247256 (1982).
  • 9
    B. Wynne, “Public Perceptions of Risk,” in The Urban Transportation of Irradiated Fuel, J.Surrey, (ed.), (Macmillan, London , 1984), pp. 246259.
  • 10
    B. Fischhoff, P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, and B. Combs, “How Safe is Safe Enough?: A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Towards Technological Risks and Benefits,” Policy Sciences 8, 127152 (1978).
  • 11
    M. Douglas and A. Wildavsky, Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers (University of California Press, Berkeley , 1982).
  • 12
    B.Johnson. V.Covello, (eds.), Social and Cultural Construction of Risk (Reidel, Boston , 1987).
  • 13
    D. von Winterfeldt and W. Edwards, Understanding Public Disputes about Risky Technologies, technical report (Social Science Research Council, New York , 1984).
  • 14
    M. T. Katzman, Chemical Catastrophes: Regulating Environmental Risk Through Pollution Liability Insurance (R. D. Irwin, Springfield , Illinois , 1985).
  • 15
    C. D. Heising and V. P. George, “Nuclear Financial Risk: Economy Wide Cost of Reactor Accidents,” Energy Policy 14, 4552 (1986).
  • 16
    H. I. Sharlin, EDB: A Case Study in the Communication of Health Risk (Office of Policy Analysis, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington , D.C. , 1985).
  • 17
    I. Hoos, “Risk Assessment in Social Perspective,” in Perceptions of Risk (National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement, Washington , 1980), pp. 3785.
  • 18
    M. L. DeFleur, Theories of Mass Communication (D. McKay, New York , 1966).
  • 19
    P. J. Shoemaker, “Mass Communication by the Book; A Review of 31 Texts,” Journal of Communication 37(3), 109131 (1987).
  • 20
    H. D. Lasswell, “The Structure and Function of Communication in Society,” in L.Bryson, (ed.), The Communication of Ideas: A Series of Addresses (Cooper Square Publishers, New York , 1948), pp. 3235.
  • 21
    C. J. Hovland, “Social Communication,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 92, 371375 (1948).
  • 22
    J. H. Sorensen and D. S. Mileti, “Decision-Making Uncertainties in Emergency Warning System Organizations,” International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters (in press).
  • 23
    S. Grunhouse, “French and Swiss Fight about Tainted Cheese,” New York Times (January, 1988), p. 2.
  • 24
    P. Slovic, “Informing and Educating the Public about Risk,” Risk Analysis 6, 403415 (1986).
  • 25
    A. Mazur, “The Journalist and Technology: Reporting about Love Canal and Three Mile Island,” Minerva 22, 4566 (1984).
  • 26
    J. Sorensen et al., Impacts of Hazardous Technology: The Psycho-Social Effects of Restarting TMI (State University of New York Press, Albany , 1987).
  • 27
    A. Weinberg, “Is Nuclear Energy Acceptable Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 33(4), 5460 (1977).
  • 28
    D.Kahneman, P.Slovic, A.Tversky, (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, New York , 1982).
  • 29
    A. Mazur, The Dynamics of Technical Controversy (Communication Press, Washington , D.C. , 1981).
  • 30
    National Research Council, Disasters and the Mass Media (National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington , D.C. , 1980).
  • 31
    B. Combs and P. Slovic, “Newspaper Coverage of Causes of Death,” Journalism Quarterly 56, 837843, 849 (1979).
  • 32
    H. Blumer, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs , New Jersey , 1969).
  • 33
    E. Goffman, Stigma (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs , New Jersey , 1963).
  • 34
    P. Slovic, “Forecasting the Adverse Economic Effects of a Nuclear Waste Repository,” in R. G.Post, (ed.), Waste Management '87 (Arizona Board of Regents, University of Arizona, Tuscon , 1987).
  • 35
    R. E. Kasperson, J. Emel, R. Goble, C. Hohenemser, J. X. Kasperson, and O. Renn, “Radioactive Wastes and the Social Amplification of Risk,” in R. G.Post, (ed.), Waste Management '87 (Arizona Board of Regents, University of Arizona, Tucson , 1987).