Advertisement

Engaging Expert Peers in the Development of Risk Assessments

Authors

  • Jacqueline Patterson,

    Corresponding author
      *Address correspondence to Jacqueline Patterson, Peer Review and Consultation Program Manager, Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment, 2300 Montana Ave., Ste. 409, Cincinnati, OH 45211, USA; tel: 513-521-7426; fax: 513-542-7487; patterson@tera.org.
    Search for more papers by this author
    • 1

      Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

  • M. E. (Bette) Meek,

    Search for more papers by this author
    • 2

      McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

  • Joan E. Strawson,

    Search for more papers by this author
    • 1

      Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

  • Robert G. Liteplo

    Search for more papers by this author
    • 3

      Therapeutic Effectiveness & Policy Bureau, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Errata

This article is corrected by:

  1. Errata: Erratum to “Engaging Expert Peers in the Development of Risk Assessments,” by Jacqueline Patterson, M. E. (Bette) Meek, Joan E. Strawson, and Robert G. Liteplo, in Risk Analysis, 27(6), 2007 Volume 28, Issue 1, 249, Article first published online: 25 February 2008

*Address correspondence to Jacqueline Patterson, Peer Review and Consultation Program Manager, Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment, 2300 Montana Ave., Ste. 409, Cincinnati, OH 45211, USA; tel: 513-521-7426; fax: 513-542-7487; patterson@tera.org.

Abstract

The participation of external technical experts in the development of risk assessment documents and methodologies has expanded and evolved in recent years. Many government agencies and authoritative organizations have experts peer review important works to evaluate the scientific and technical defensibility and judge the strength of the assumptions and conclusions (OMB, 2004; IPCS, 2005; IARC, 2006; Health Canada, 2007; U.S. EPA, 2006). Expert advice has been solicited in other forms of peer involvement, including peer consultation in, for example, the U.S. EPA's Voluntary Children's Chemical Evaluation Program (VCCEP). This article discusses how the principles and practices of peer review can be extended to other types of peer involvement activities (i.e., peer input and peer consultation) to develop high-quality risk assessment work products. A comprehensive process for incorporating peer input, peer consultation, and peer review into risk assessment science is outlined. Four key principles for peer involvement—independence, inclusion of appropriate experts, transparency, and a robust scientific process—are discussed. Recent examples of peer involvement in the development of Health Canada's Priority Substances and Domestic Substance List (DSL) programs under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) serve to highlight the concepts.

Ancillary