Division of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, W2 1NY, UK.
Domain Effects and Financial Risk Attitudes
Article first published online: 9 JUN 2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01433.x
© 2010 Society for Risk Analysis
Additional Information
How to Cite
Vlaev, I., Kusev, P., Stewart, N., Aldrovandi, S. and Chater, N. (2010), Domain Effects and Financial Risk Attitudes. Risk Analysis, 30: 1374–1386. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01433.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 SEP 2010
- Article first published online: 9 JUN 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Financial risk;
- framing effects;
- risk attitudes;
- risk perception
We investigated whether financial risk preferences are dependent on the financial domain (i.e., the context) in which the risky choice options are presented. Previous studies have demonstrated that risk attitudes change when gambles are framed as gains, losses, or as insurance. Our study explores this directly by offering choices between identical gambles, framed in terms of seven financial domains. Three factors were extracted, explaining 68.6% of the variance: Factor 1 (Positive)—opportunity to win, pension provision, and job salary change; Factor 2 (Positive-Complex)—investments and mortgage buying; Factor 3 (Negative)—possibility of loss and insurance. Inspection of the solution revealed context effects on risk perceptions across the seven scenarios. We also found that the commonly accepted assumption that women are more risk averse cannot be confirmed with the context structure suggested in this research; however, it is acknowledged that in the students’ population the variance across genders might be considerably less. These results suggest that our financial risk attitude measures may be tapping into a stable aspect of “context dependence” of relevance to real-world decision making.

1539-6924/asset/bannerforeground.gif?v=1&s=82f6a506357b8533132010a6231f5bf3f0e631fd)
