Get access
Advertisement

Nanotechnology, Risk, and Oversight: Learning Lessons from Related Emerging Technologies

Authors

  • Jennifer Kuzma,

    Corresponding author
    1. Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota; School of Mass Communications, University of Nevada–Las Vegas.
      Address correspondence to Jennifer Kuzma, 301 19th Ave. S., 160 Humphrey Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; tel: 612-625-6337; fax: 612-625-3513; kuzma007@umn.edu.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Susanna Priest

    1. Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota; School of Mass Communications, University of Nevada–Las Vegas.
    Search for more papers by this author

Address correspondence to Jennifer Kuzma, 301 19th Ave. S., 160 Humphrey Center, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; tel: 612-625-6337; fax: 612-625-3513; kuzma007@umn.edu.

Abstract

Emerging technologies are defined by their novelty and thus are accompanied by significant uncertainty in determining appropriate ways to manage risks associated with them. Yet, there is a body of prior knowledge about risk management and oversight policy for other technologies that have already permeated society. Here, we describe two ways in which prospective oversight policy analysis for emerging technologies can draw upon these past experiences. One involves comparing specific products that have already been marketed to similar products of the emerging technology (cognate-product approach). The other treats the emerging technology as a body of products and methods and relates it to another technological field that has already emerged and penetrated markets (whole-technology approach). In this article, we describe our work using these approaches to inform risk and oversight policy for nanotechnology and its products. We draw parallels between biotechnology and nanotechnology as whole fields of development and also between genetically engineered organisms in the food supply and agricultural products of nanotechnology. Through these comparisons, we find that both approaches to historical learning have value and present lessons that could be applied to nanotechnology.

Get access to the full text of this article

Ancillary