The authors can be contacted via e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org,email@example.com, and firstname.lastname@example.org, respectively. This research was conducted with support from the German Research Foundation, the Fritz-Thyssen Foundation, the German Association for Insurance Research, and the German Investment and Asset Management Association. Opinions and errors are solely those of the authors and not of the institutions with whom the authors are affiliated.
Optimal Gradual Annuitization: Quantifying the Costs of Switching to Annuities
Version of Record online: 5 NOV 2008
© The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2008
Journal of Risk and Insurance
Volume 75, Issue 4, pages 1019–1038, December 2008
How to Cite
Horneff, W. J., Maurer, R. H. and Stamos, M. Z. (2008), Optimal Gradual Annuitization: Quantifying the Costs of Switching to Annuities. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 75: 1019–1038. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2008.00295.x
- Issue online: 5 NOV 2008
- Version of Record online: 5 NOV 2008
We compute the optimal dynamic annuitization and asset allocation policy for a retiree with Epstein–Zin preferences, uncertain investment horizon, potential bequest motives, and pre-existing pension income. In our setting the retiree can decide each year how much he consumes and how much he invests in stocks, bonds, and life annuities, while the prior literature mostly considered restricted so-called deterministic or stochastic switching strategies. We show that postponing the annuity purchase is no longer optimal in the gradual annuitization (GA) case since investors are able to attain the optimal mix between liquid assets (stocks and bonds) and illiquid life annuities each year. In order to assess potential utility losses, we benchmark various restricted annuitization strategies against the unrestricted GA strategy.