DANIEL BAR-TAL received his Ph.D. in social psychology from the University of Pittsburgh, and is currently on the faculty in education at Tel Aviv University. During the first part of his career he concentrated on studying prosocial behavior and achievement attributions. In the last decade his interest has focused on knowledge acquisition and change in general, and specifically on political beliefs shared by group members, including conflict, patriotism, siege mentality, security, and delegitimization. He recently authored Group Beliefs and coedited The Social Psychology of Knowledge, The Social Psychology of Intergroup Conflict and Stereotyping and Prejudice.
Causes and Consequences of Delegitimization: Models of Conflict and Ethnocentrism
Article first published online: 14 APR 2010
1990 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
Journal of Social Issues
Volume 46, Issue 1, pages 65–81, Spring 1990
How to Cite
Bar-Tal, D. (1990), Causes and Consequences of Delegitimization: Models of Conflict and Ethnocentrism. Journal of Social Issues, 46: 65–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00272.x
- Issue published online: 14 APR 2010
- Article first published online: 14 APR 2010
Delegitimization is the process of categorizing groups into extremely negative social categories and excluding them from acceptability. This paper analyzes the causes and consequences of delegitimization, and suggests two models that describe the role of conflict in delegitimization and of ethnocentrism in delegitimization. During conflict, when the ingroup perceives the negating goal(s) of an outgroup as far-reaching and evil, feelings of threat become intensified and delegitimization may be used to explain the conflict. Then, to prevent danger, the ingroup may harm the threatening group and justify the harm by delegitimization, which in turn increases perceived threat and intensifies harmful behavior toward the other group. Even mild conflicts can escalate, become violent, and lead to delegitimization as an explanation, and later, as justification. Ethnocentrism is related to this process because groups that are perceived as very different and devalued arouse feelings of fear and contempt. Their delegitimization leads to harm, and later, to intensified delegitimization to justify the harm.