Preparation of this work and the research described herein were supported by grants to the Center for the Analysis of Pathways from Childhood to Adulthood from the National Science Foundation (0322356) and to the Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children from the National Institute of Mental Health (MH40864) and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD054850).
Exceptions to High School Dropout Predictions in a Low-Income Sample: Do Adults Make a Difference?
Article first published online: 7 FEB 2008
2008 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
Journal of Social Issues
Volume 64, Issue 1, pages 77–94, March 2008
How to Cite
Englund, M. M., Egeland, B. and Collins, W. A. (2008), Exceptions to High School Dropout Predictions in a Low-Income Sample: Do Adults Make a Difference?. Journal of Social Issues, 64: 77–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00549.x
- Issue published online: 7 FEB 2008
- Article first published online: 7 FEB 2008
Adult–child relationship factors were examined to determine whether they differentiated between individuals who follow expected versus unexpected educational pathways. Low-income participants (96 men, 83 women) in the United States were followed from birth through age 23. Individuals were identified who followed expected versus unexpected pathways to high school graduation or dropping out based on academic achievement and behavioral problems. Patterns of parental involvement in school were significantly different between expected dropouts and unexpected graduates in middle childhood. In contrast, expected graduates had higher levels of parent involvement in middle childhood, more supportive parent–child relationships in early adolescence, and higher levels of social competence with adults than unexpected dropouts.