Motives of Heterosexual Allies in Collective Action for Equality

Authors

  • Glenda M. Russell

    Corresponding author
    1. University of Colorado
      Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Glenda M. Russell, Counseling and Psychological Services, 104 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309–0104 [e-mail: gmrussell5@hotmail.com].
    Search for more papers by this author

  • The author thanks the following individuals for their help with this research: Anne Clark, Sandy Dixon, Mayday Levine, Robin Lopez, Autumn Porubsky, Jim Davis Rosenthal, Samantha Rukert, Marcia Westkott, Carmen Williams, and especially Janis Bohan, David Lilly, Karen Raforth, and the allies who shared their journeys.

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Glenda M. Russell, Counseling and Psychological Services, 104 UCB, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309–0104 [e-mail: gmrussell5@hotmail.com].

Abstract

The literature on collective action in support of equality without regard to sexual orientation or gender identity has emphasized the role of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) activists. Relatively little attention has been given to the role of members of the advantaged group, heterosexual allies who work for equality. This study presents data from an ongoing study of 127 allies who have been visibly active in these efforts in the United States. The findings suggest two major sets of ally motives: those rooted in fundamental principles (justice, civil rights, patriotism, religious beliefs, moral principles, and using privilege to positive ends) and those based on personal experiences or roles (professional roles, family relationships, valuing marriage, achieving closure on personal experiences, transforming guilt, and anger). The findings suggest that the concept of opinion-based groups holds promise for conceptualizing and mobilizing LGBT–ally collective action.

Ancillary