SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Melissa L. Shirley, Karen E. Irving, Connected Classroom Technology Facilitates Multiple Components of Formative Assessment Practice, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24, 1, 56

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Thorhallur O. Flosason, Heather M. McGee, Lori Diener-Ludwig, Evaluating Impact of Small-Group Discussion on Learning Utilizing a Classroom Response System, Journal of Behavioral Education, 2015, 24, 3, 317

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Denise M. Farag, Susan Park, Gundars Kaupins, Faculty Perceptions of the Adoption and Use of Clickers in the Legal Studies in Business Classroom, Journal of Education for Business, 2015, 90, 4, 208

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Chih-Yueh Chou, Pin-Hsun Lin, Promoting discussion in peer instruction: Discussion partner assignment and accountability scoring mechanisms, British Journal of Educational Technology, 2015, 46, 4
  5. 5
    Michael E. Lantz, Angela Stawiski, Effectiveness of clickers: Effect of feedback and the timing of questions on learning, Computers in Human Behavior, 2014, 31, 280

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Michele L. Barr, Encouraging College Student Active Engagement in Learning: The Influence of Response Methods, Innovative Higher Education, 2014, 39, 4, 307

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Janet, Man-wai Cheung, Alan, Nga-lun Wong, Emmy, Yin-ha Chan, Engaging students with clickers in language lessons, SpringerPlus, 2014, 3, Suppl 1, O8

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Karl M. Oswald, Adam B. Blake, Dario T. Santiago, Enhancing Immediate Retention with Clickers Through Individual Response Identification, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2014, 28, 3
  9. 9
    Justin F. Hummer, Joseph W. LaBrie, Sean P. Grant, Andrew Lac, Phillip J. Ehret, The role of assessment environment on self-reported alcohol use and perceived group norms: Comparing Web-based surveys to a group setting involving handheld keypads, Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 2014, 21, 2, 147

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Charles E. Downing, Julia Spears, Michaela Holtz, Transforming a Course to Blended Learning for Student Engagement, Education Research International, 2014, 2014, 1

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Lisa Ann Rodriguez, Maryfriend Shepard, Adult English Language Learners' Perceptions of Audience Response Systems (Clickers) as Communication Aides: A Q-Methodology Study, TESOL Journal, 2013, 4, 1
  12. 12
    David R. Bright, Kelly Reilly Kroustos, David H. Kinder, Audience response systems during case-based discussions: A pilot study of student perceptions, Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 2013, 5, 5, 410

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Denise Stanley, Can Technology Improve Large Class Learning? The Case of an Upper-Division Business Core Class, Journal of Education for Business, 2013, 88, 5, 265

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Lorena Blasco-Arcas, Isabel Buil, Blanca Hernández-Ortega, F. Javier Sese, Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance, Computers & Education, 2013, 62, 102

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Francisco J. Liébana-Cabanillas, Myriam Martínez-Fiestas, Francisco Rejón-Guardia, Technologies for Inclusive Education, 2013,

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Jennifer L. Trew, Jacqueline L. Nelsen, Getting the most out of audience response systems: predicting student reactions, Learning, Media and Technology, 2012, 37, 4, 379

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Alistair Brandon-Jones, Francisco J. Arenas-Márquez, José A.D. Machuca, Carmen Medina-López, Interactive learning in operations management higher education, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2012, 32, 12, 1395

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Ameeta Jain, Alan Farley, Mobile Phone-Based Audience Response System and Student Engagement in Large-Group Teaching, Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy, 2012, 31, 4
  19. 19
    Luke R. Garceau, William P. Ebben, Duane V. Knudson, Teaching practices of the undergraduate introductory biomechanics faculty: a North American survey, Sports Biomechanics, 2012, 11, 4, 542

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Stephen J. Pape, Karen E. Irving, Clare V. Bell, Melissa L. Shirley, Douglas T. Owens, Sharilyn Owens, Jonathan D. Bostic, Soon Chun Lee, Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact, 2012,

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Rafaela Alfalla-Luque, Carmen Medina-López, Francisco J. Arenas-Márquez, Mejorando la formación en Dirección de Operaciones: la visión del estudiante y su respuesta ante diferentes metodologías docentes, Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 2011, 14, 1, 40

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Carla Carnaghan, Thomas P. Edmonds, Thomas A. Lechner, Philip R. Olds, Using student response systems in the accounting classroom: Strengths, strategies and limitations, Journal of Accounting Education, 2011, 29, 4, 265

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Yifat Ben-David Kolikant, Denise Drane, Susanna Calkins, “Clickers” as Catalysts for Transformation of Teachers, College Teaching, 2010, 58, 4, 127

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Barbara Patterson, Judith Kilpatrick, Eric Woebkenberg, Evidence for teaching practice: The impact of clickers in a large classroom environment, Nurse Education Today, 2010, 30, 7, 603

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    Michel Léger, Jimmy Bourque, Jean-François Richard, Influence des télévoteurs sur le résultat scolaire : une méta-analyse, Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire, 2010, 7, 2, 35

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Steven A. Yourstone, Howard S. Kraye, Gerald Albaum, Online Quantitative-Based Assignments—Are More Attempts Better for Learning?, Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2010, 8, 2
  27. 27
    Dennis M. Shaffer, Michael J. Collura, Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Personal Response System in the Classroom, Teaching of Psychology, 2009, 36, 4, 273

    CrossRef