I have previously written on Pollock in “Fixing the Constitutional Absurdity of the Apportionment of Direct Tax,” 21 Const. Commentary 2 (2004) and “Apportionment of Direct Taxes: The Foul-up in the Core of the Constitution,” 7 William & Mary Bill of Rights J. 1 (1998), and this paper draws freely from those articles.
The Four Good Dissenters in Pollock
Version of Record online: 20 AUG 2007
Journal of Supreme Court History
Volume 32, Issue 2, pages 162–177, August 2007
How to Cite
JOHNSON, C. H. (2007), The Four Good Dissenters in Pollock. Journal of Supreme Court History, 32: 162–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5818.2007.00159.x
- Issue online: 20 AUG 2007
- Version of Record online: 20 AUG 2007
Options for accessing this content:
- If you are a society or association member and require assistance with obtaining online access instructions please contact our Journal Customer Services team.
- If your institution does not currently subscribe to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
- Login via other institutional login options http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/login-options.
- You can purchase online access to this Article for a 24-hour period (price varies by title)
- If you already have a Wiley Online Library or Wiley InterScience user account: login above and proceed to purchase the article.
- New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.
Login via OpenAthens
Search for your institution's name below to login via Shibboleth.
Registered Users please login:
- Access your saved publications, articles and searches
- Manage your email alerts, orders and subscriptions
- Change your contact information, including your password
Please register to:
- Save publications, articles and searches
- Get email alerts
- Get all the benefits mentioned below!