We thank the two mining companies involved for providing access to their sites, employees, and internal data, and the Australian Research Council for funding support. We also thank our two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.
Organizational Trust and the Limits of Management-Based Regulation
Version of Record online: 11 DEC 2009
© 2009 by The Law and Society Association
Law & Society Review
Volume 43, Issue 4, pages 865–900, December 2009
How to Cite
Gunningham, N. and Sinclair, D. (2009), Organizational Trust and the Limits of Management-Based Regulation. Law & Society Review, 43: 865–900. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00391.x
- Issue online: 11 DEC 2009
- Version of Record online: 11 DEC 2009
This article examines the relationship between management-based regulation and occupational health and safety through two case studies. The first describes how corporate occupational health and safety systems and standards were interpreted and implemented differently at different mine sites within the same company and examines the particular role of trust between workers and management in explaining variations in occupational health and safety performance. The second explores the difficulties of moving from a highly devolved system of responsibility to a more centralized approach, and the incapacity of externally mandated management-based regulation to change behavior at site level in the absence of a supportive workplace culture. The article argues that notwithstanding the heavy emphasis currently being placed on both internal (company-driven) and external (government-driven) management-based regulation, a commitment at corporate level does not necessarily percolate down to individual facilities where ritualistic responses or resistant subcultures may thwart effective change. The findings have important implications for the effectiveness of management-based regulation and meta-regulation more broadly.